Just read what I wrote in the qoute from me in your last post Wanshan, Sorry if you percieved me to be sarcastic that wasnt my intention.
“(Below) The latest artists impressions of the Type 45, first published in June 2002. Again only minor changes, most notably the re-alignment of the Sylver A50 modules in the VLS silo, visually there now seems to be space allowed for an additional centre line row of up to 3×8 cells – for a total of 72 Sylver cells – although this has never been claimed and internally the space may be used for access, services and other purposes. However BAE Systems and the DPA have indicate that the Type 45 design can potentially take up to 16 land attack missiles such as Tomahawk, and the cells would presumably be fitted in to this space.”
From
http://navy-matters.beedall.com/daring1-1.htm
Try reading.
Israel has no need whatsoever for F22s and frankly with the state that her only realy threatening neighbour is in (Syria) as well as the fact that she just loves technology transfers to less than reputable clients its about time she stood on her own two feet- ie she actually pays for something herself rather than through US tax-payers.
The manner in which the article ciscusses an International version does make me wonder whether they would consider using F-35 tech to give the F-22 a more multi-role capability, especially seeing the recent success of advanced F-15E variants.
If you look at the latest pictures of the T45 there is space in between the two existing rows of 3 for a further row of 3. This link and information has been posted here more times than I can count but here it is again.
That article says nothing about the Rafale and is almost certainly talking about the LCA.
If the Indian do opt for the Rafale, they may feel that in the short term they have the best capability but ultimately the Typhoon is the better plane for the money.
So India is going to fill the 126 aircraft MRCA requirement with just two Rafales? :rolleyes:
Sounds to me more like the plan is to fit the Kaveri to Rafales just to test the engine, in real world conditions, as the french did with the M88 on the mirage 4000.
I remember reading it in the UK publication Warships IFR-but of course it may be my mind playing tricks on me.
The T-45 having space for 72 Sylver A-70 cells in an accepted fact-look at the navy matters website.
As far as I am aware the MoD has not ordered the ASTER-15 as of yet and the speculation is that the T-45s will only carry the Aster-30. Either way the T-45 has space for 72 Aster-30 carrying VLS cells-the F100 simply cant match that.
And if upgraded the F-100 cant match the T-45 (potential for 72 Aster-30’s)
ESSM, isnt a AAW weapon.
remember that these ships are intended as AAW ships. The Sampson is regarded as at least equal to the Aegis system. This has already been discussed in the F124 versus T45 thread so this one is a bit irrelevant.
Type 45, is a completely different ship (with the exception of the missile fit) to the French and Italian ships.
I would rate the new European DDG’s as follows,
1) Type-45.
2) F-100.
3) Joint position for the new Dutch ships and the Horizon.
4) F124
So if we say that 5 a month can be produced, thats 60 per annum, which means that the 300 figure can be achieved within five years. If we assume that 100 have already been built that leaves 200, so thats about 3.5 to 4 years therefore I would suspect that the 300 figure will be reached in 2010. With it being very unlikely that there will be anything other than another J-10 variant to replace it in production by then it is very likely we will see more than 300.
Incidently the source that posted in one of my earlier posts says that delivery of some 250 engines (not including the original 54) should be complete in 2010. Then of course there is the WS-10A as well-is it true that the chinese are working on TVC for that engine?
If there realy are 100+ J-10’s out there then I think we could eventually see more than the 300 that has been predicted. If we assume production began in 2002, then 25 a year have been produced on average, but we can probably assume that the rate of production has been increasing, so it would not surprise me if some 30 have been produced in the past 12 months- a very respectable rate of production. Considering that the J-11 appears to have fallen from favour, the PLAAF still seems reluctant about the FC-1, and the rumoured advanced versions of the J-10 that are being developed, it seems as if the future of the J-10 in PLAAF service is very bright.
Although I would like to see some images of in service J-10’s with BVR’s.
Thanks for that pic you posted edissonne, very interesting, but it would be better in the Navy forum.
Just been looking at the numbers of AL-31FNs ordered/delivered. The only thing which seems certain is that some 54 were delivered in the 2001/2002 period. There were reports that some 250 were ordered in mid 2004 ( http://www.gateway2russia.com/st/art_260291.php ), whilst other sources say that about 100 were ordered in August 2005. I cant be certain about either of these. But it would seem to be likely that there are enough AL-31FNs in china for this aircraft to be the 100th example.