dark light

sealordlawrence

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,461 through 5,475 (of 5,730 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: S-400 Question #2044046
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Try reading the thread before replying to it Noerper and you realise that the missile has already been tested. What do you think the technical probelms are? Do you have any idea how difficult it is to build one of the most advanced air defence systems in the world? let alone during a period of economic and political turmoil?
    The reason there appears to be little official information on the programme is becouse it is largely secretive in a similar way to many US projects.
    Your anti-russian BS is actually rather ignorant, boring, uneducated, childish and pathetic.

    in reply to: Pakistan test-fires first ground-launched cruise missile #2044073
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Actually I never doubted any of that, I just have my suspicions about the ability of the Agostas to launch this weapon. But what was interesting about your list is that pakistan developed none of it.

    in reply to: Pakistan test-fires first ground-launched cruise missile #2044076
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    I will believe it when I see it.

    in reply to: Pakistan test-fires first ground-launched cruise missile #2044080
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    The spokesman is not saying that there is a naval version he is saying that submarine launched cruise missiles in general are significant strike weapons.
    The reason Pakistan is able to put this weapon into prodeuction so quickly is becouse it was desighned, developed and tested by the chinese (who probably took a big lump of cash from pakistan for their trouble) who then shipped the finished ready to build kit to Pakistan where it was assembled (likely by chinese engineers) then fired. Then the pakistanis say look at us arnt we fantastic.
    The idea that pakistan developed this on their own is a joke, the only indigenous aerospace product they have is the not so super mushak.

    in reply to: Pakistan test-fires first ground-launched cruise missile #2044129
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Your jumping the gun a bit arnt you? I havnt seen anybody mentioning a naval and especially sub launched variant.

    in reply to: Pakistan test-fires first ground-launched cruise missile #2044162
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    CEP is anybodys guess, but it seems to be a fact that china aquired Kh55s from the Ukraine and there are persistant rumours of Tomahawk bits/remains/debry/failed to explode bits being aquired, so CEP may be quite good. From the big publicity event that has surrounded this I would have thought that induction is not far off now the chinese have probably completed develoment.

    in reply to: Pakistan test-fires first ground-launched cruise missile #2044168
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    The second Picture in the first post of your first link was the one that comes to mind, the similarities in general appearance are quite striking. I wonder how much Pakistan paid for this?

    in reply to: Pakistan test-fires first ground-launched cruise missile #2044174
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Beocouse it is china, Pakistan could never build something like this.
    It reminds me of a picture that appeared a while back showing a ver Tomahawk like cruise missile hanging in a chinese workshop, if anyone knows the one I mean could you please post it?

    in reply to: Pakistan test-fires first ground-launched cruise missile #2044393
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    I wonder what profit the chinese made on that?

    in reply to: S-400 Question #2044396
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Thanks SOC, that was the picture I was reffering to in one of my earlier posts. You realy know your stuff about Russian SAM’s

    in reply to: YOU GUYS ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THIS ! #2085368
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    I dont quite understand what you mean?

    in reply to: S-400 Question #2044444
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    If it is going into service this year then it must already exist, you cannot develop and build a capable SAM system in 12 months. The quoute posted by Bunga proves there is a Long range missile, so loose the anti-russian BS and start thinking rationally.
    Explain to me why this is a waste of Russian taxpayers money?

    Bunga, I think what the article is translation is trying to say is that the missile hit a target at a range of 327kms rather than that being the actual range of the missile.

    in reply to: S-400 Question #2044488
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    State tests are different to actual tests performed by the manufacturer/desighner. First the system is desighned and then built and then tested by the desighners/builders, then it has state acceptance testing. Thus the S-400 has undergone desighner/manufacturer trials but not state acceptance trials, although I have been lead to believe that since this article was writtne such trials may well have taken place.
    I have never seen the 327km figure before so I cannot comment on it. Bu the fact is that there are two missiles as described in the link I showed you, the big missile with a 400km range and the quadpacked missile with the 120km missiles.
    Do not confuse system capability with actual individual missiles. The suggestion is that 2 missiles together as the S-400 system are capble of providing coverage in the short range tier, medium range tier, and long range tier. The system should thus be capable of being the replacement for the Buk M1 system and the existing S-300 systems (probably excluding the S-300V systems) aswell as providing a new longer range capability.

    in reply to: YOU GUYS ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THIS ! #2085456
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    As Eisenhower said,

    “Every warship launched, every rocket fired, every gun made, signifies in the final sense, a theft from all those who hunger and are not fed, from all those who are cold and are not clothed.”

    in reply to: Sealords ultimate flanker, could it be done? #2606226
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Becouse until the Irbis comes along the MSFE will be better than the BARS although I am not sure at what stage development is.
    I have a thing about the Single seat Flankers, they just look cool.
    The Su27/35BM use the AL41 engines and I was hoping to just use the Al31s in my little fantasy.

Viewing 15 posts - 5,461 through 5,475 (of 5,730 total)