dark light

sealordlawrence

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 5,730 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Will the Eurofighter flop? #2458936
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    I would place money on the Swiss buying the Gripen (actually a quick £100 bet seems like a good idea – I’m not a betting man but it seems quite a good idea to me … wonder what the odds are?)

    Absolutely Gripen should have Switzerland sewn up and i think Brazil would do well to purchase the type too. Unfortunately I suspect they may buy Rafale.

    India is the interesting one….

    in reply to: Rebuilding the Royal Navy #2067276
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    What exactly is expensive in doing a canister 200cm longer from the very start? But look, the only thing requiring A70 is Scalp Naval. Who wants to bet it will be housed in some Harpoon-like deck canisters? Let me guess – behind the funnel? Or behind the VLS hive?
    In any case I bet it won’t go into the VLS, since 48 is already too low. And with Scalp not going there, what’s the chance for rebuilding the hive for maybe four or six super-long missiles?

    A70’s were not available when the first T45’s were built/laid down to the best of my knowledge. The expensive bit is purchasing the missiles then making Sampson BMD capable. T45 should already have spave in the Hive for longer cells.

    in reply to: Private military contractors – anti piracy patrols #2067303
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Its the merchant shipping companies own fault really, their insurance companies paid the ransoms teaching the warlords that its pays leading to the situation we have now.

    Well the other problem for the shipping companies is that they have to raise crews, if you let one crew get slaughtered instead of paying the ransom you wont get another and ship companies simply can not afford that. Not to mention the loss of custom that they would suffer if they lost a cargo and the way their insurance rates would go up. For business purpose once a ship is hijacked the best thing they can do is pay the ransom rather than risk crew, cargo and reputation.

    in reply to: Private military contractors – anti piracy patrols #2067314
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    I actually would not be surprised if we start seeing private military contractors guarding Merchant ships. Shipping companies are going to start getting irritated by having to pay ransoms and with the draw down in Iraq there will be a allot of unemployed fmc’s. However i see no reason for them to have their own boats. Ten guys with assault and sniper rifles should be more than sufficient and they only need to be embarked around the horn of Africa. Also of interest is the sonic devise used to defend a cruise liner a while back.

    in reply to: Will the Eurofighter flop? #2459038
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    They are indeed.

    But how many countries can you find like that?

    Will Eurofighter face the “Real” competition Typhoon and score sale??

    Who cares?

    in reply to: Will the Eurofighter flop? #2459078
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Saudi Arabia would have bought, “even if” it would have lemon. Remember the $40 Billion Tornado:D,

    Austria, if not for BAE “effort” to subvert, Gripen would have walked away with it.

    So? They are still sales.

    in reply to: Will the Eurofighter flop? #2459149
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Reading other postings on here and it seems as if the Eurofighter seems to be losing an increasing number of competitions for sale to several other nations. Several reasons are given but could the Eurofighter flop as a major export model due to competition from Rissia, America and even other European nations?

    It has already not flopped. Saudi Arabia has brought a bunch with rumours of a further order floating around and Austria has brought an example not to mention the 4 original customers. 6 airforces is a pretty good tally and already better than the rafale and the Gripen.

    in reply to: Rebuilding the Marine National #2067351
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    What the hell is the difference? You said I suggested it was redirected from another deployment, and that I was wrong, and in fact I was NOT.

    They could have deployed a Pacific Fleet ship for all anyone cares – it seems they wanted this specific ship to spend some time elsewhere and so it’s going there – and NOW, is going to overwatch the Faina along with the American ships.

    It is only overwatching the Faina because it was already going to Somalia. You deliberately tried to suggest that Neustrashimy was redirected, if you suggest otherwise now you are a liar.

    It makes a massive difference, common sense dictates that you deploy the nearest available ship, in this case that would be a Black Sea fleet unit. The fact that a Baltic unit was dispatched suggests that none of the black sea fleet ships are up to the task.

    in reply to: Chinook HC4?! #2459174
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    One thing that can almost be guaranteed is that the MoD will make a complete mess of the speccing and acquisition process of any RAF Chinook upgrade programme.

    After all they’ve such a spectacular past record of incomptenence and waste in this area.

    Not necessarily the use of off the shelf components and a deep enough rebuild should avoid such a mess. The Thales top deck system was mentioned when the plan first emerged to sort out the special ops birds.

    in reply to: Rebuilding the Marine National #2067357
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Neustrashimy was actually on the way to Africa . . .

    “The Neustrashimy (Fearless) frigate from the Baltic Fleet left the main naval base in Russia’s Baltic exclave of Kaliningrad on Wednesday to ensure security in several regions of the world oceans,” Capt. 1st Rank Igor Dygalo said.

    “WEDNESDAY” is the 24th of September!

    http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080926/117144421.html

    So? That is the point, she was specifically deployed to Somalia, that was her one and only mission. Jonesey’s point is that it would have been far more rational to task a Black Sea fleet ship rather than the Neustrashimy.

    Neustrashimy was not deployed for the Faina.

    in reply to: Rebuilding the Marine National #2067366
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    ?! :confused:

    Faina left on the 25th, Neustrashimy left on the 24th.

    So how am I wrong? It was en-route already?

    You are implying that Neustrashimy was redirected from another deployment, there is no evidence for that. Everything points to her having put to sea with the sole mission of sailing for Somalia.

    What the Faina did is irrelevant, she is a Ukrainian ship carrying a Ukrainian cargo to the Kenyan government. The small number of Russian sailors on board is really not an issue. Neustrashimy’s deployment is related to international prestige.

    in reply to: Rebuilding the Royal Navy #2067372
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Ah! Glorious equipment decisions! Besides the fact, that the wonderful T45 class has only 48 VLS cells, they are A-50 (of the glorious Sylver, which sprouted four different flavours). A BMD Aster-45 to compete with THAAD or SM-2/IV or SM-3 would be a nice thing for sure. Too bad it wouldn’t fit into the brand new T45’s VLS hive.

    Fitted for but not with, space is reserved for more and longer VLS cells.;) But it would still be an expensive exercise.

    in reply to: Rebuilding the Marine National #2067374
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    It was already deployed – I’m saying this for the 4th time now.

    You are wrong Neustrashimy left Kaliningrad on the 24th September, at that time the purpose of the cruise was unspecified but was described as long range. Captain 1st Rank Igor Dygalo announced that the ship washeading for Somalia on the 26th September.

    in reply to: Somali Pirates vs USN and Russian Navy! #2067479
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    I also think the Apache’s would be a better choice.

    Trouble with that scenario though there’s too many non combatants around, there would be a lot of collaterol damage.

    The even bigger problem is that in Somalia everything is ‘vaguely fortified’, its a failed state dominated by warlords there is little if any distinguishing feature between a civilian and a combatant.

    in reply to: Chinook HC4?! #2460115
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    They certainly are getting hammered in the Ghan;)

    Watched a BBC news report recently with an RAF crew guy proudly showing some field repairs. It was real belts and braces stuff with bracing frames and plates bolted together.

    At least one Chinook flying there is half a stuffed RAF example and half ex Argentine Falklands war booty!

    I really hope that nothing too bad happens to “Bravo November” as she just has to survive to be placed into preservation.

    Its not just damage, the chinooks are amongst the most useful in the theatre and they are operating at a very high intensity in hot and high conditions and that is taking its toll on aircraft and systems.

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 5,730 total)