dark light

sealordlawrence

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 5,730 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rebuilding the Marine National #2067511
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    The Black Sea has opposition seapower pocketed up in an oversized bloody pond!. If there EVER was a theatre those Backfires and MR Fencers would’ve had a field day that was it!. Why not use this magnificent airpower when it can actually be employed to some good!!!. The Neustrashimy….was….in….the….Baltic thats a 4500-5000nm, 10 day, transit at a steady 20knts. For a navy thats not really been deploying a lot for a while thats ambitious when there are much nearer assets that could be used!. It does not make a lot of sense even tasking that vessel in the first place.

    Take it for what you will, but rumour has it that the Black sea fleet was pushed to its limits by the Georgia campaign in terms of the back end support. The ships had been exercising prior to the conflict and period of intensive operations (by Russian standards) took its toll on ships, systems and and supplies. The suspicion goes that they need a period in dock to sort themselves out. It is worth noting how quickly the ships returned to port afterwards. The assumption has to be made that the Neustrashimy was the closest ocean going unit that was in sufficient material state and with an adequately competent crew to actually undertake the voyage.

    In short the Georgian campaign does not paint the picture of a fleet that is capable of sustained operations by the majority of its units but of one that struggles to surge its best assets on token and minor operations to give the impression of a powerful force.

    This is further supported by the fact that the three units currently at sea on long range patrols are the most modern ocean going surface units in the Russian fleet, Neustrashimy (commissioned 1993) Pyotr Velikhiy (commissioned 1995) and Admiral Chabanenko (commissioned 1999). And what has happened to the Admiral Kuznetsov after her little two month jaunt to the Med at the beginning of the year, we have heard practically nothing of her up until now when she takes a little trip out into the Barents sea to operate as a viewing platform for Mevedev. The reason is because she now had to spend an extended period in port. The fact is that the Russian navy is still afflicted with a mass of aging and poorly maintained ships backed up by an underfunded and corrupt support system.

    Conclusion: Fan boy paper fleets and the SSN force aside the Russian navy is still a fleet that represents more of a danger to itself than it does to anybody else.

    in reply to: Somali Pirates vs USN and Russian Navy! #2067515
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Park HMS Ocean Down there, fill it up with Merlins and the Gunship version of lynx along with a bunch of Para’s or Royal Marine’s to back up SAS and SBS units. use UAV’s to track suspect boats, the SAS and SBS to keep an eye on the place, and then send in the cavalry via Mr Merlin with Mr Lynx taking out anything looking remotely fortified.

    I hope you have allot of spare cash.;)

    in reply to: A400M delay has RAF concerned #2460153
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Buy more C-17’s, its what the air bridge needs.

    in reply to: Chinook HC4?! #2460155
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Is HC4 what those stored “problem” Chinooks were supposed to be or is this taking them and eveything else up another level?

    Them and everything else up to another level. As correctly stated above chinooks are getting hammered in the ghan.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2067605
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Follow the link UAZ gave. Immeasurably better picture. Zoom in, & you can see her very well. She hasn’t been stripped, at least externally, but she looks in poor shape. Very rusty & decayed-looking.

    By stripped I mean internal components, furnishings, wiring etc. And probably not legitimately.;)

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2067681
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Where is she at? Sebastopol? If so, she looks pretty finished to me…

    :D:D:D

    Dude seriously that thing has spent nearly two decades sat rusting, almost certainly with out any sort of maintenance and probably stripped of anything of value years ago. that is nothing more than a rusting hulk and the Ukraine would be best to sell it for scrap and be done with it. At least it would end all the pointless internet rumors.

    Oh and the next person who thinks that one can judge the state of a ship in port by a satellite picture of that resolution should be banned.

    in reply to: Chinook HC4?! #2460621
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    According to some aircraft mags this month, Britain’s MOD want to upgrade all of their Chinooks to a “HC4” standard . Now does anyone think is a begining to a new fiasco for uk’s armed forces again?

    Potentially quite the opposite. HC4 involves new avionics, improved defensive aids and Bowman compatibility. This should bring the entire fleet a common standard.

    in reply to: Rebuilding the Royal Navy #2068656
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Actually, BAe seem to be trying to do just that – compete head-on with the Reaper for the RAF. They’re pitching it to the RAF as not having the drawbacks of the Reaper, i.e. that it’s manpower-intensive & needs to be flown from Nevada. So far, the RAF has two Reapers in service, with another (attrition replacement) on order. An order for 10 more Reapers was mooted, but canned, & there is talk of Mantis being sent to Afghanistan for field trials next year. Hmmm . . . I wonder how much lobbying is going on the background?

    Mantis is also intended to be exportable, without any US export controls.

    Rumour has it, and take it for what you will, that the lobbying went both ways…or at least BAe would not have pushed ahead with the project without some significant support from the MoD. Also consider that Mantis is not critical to BAes UCAV development program.

    in reply to: Rebuilding the Marine National #2068738
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    :(Funny thing this comes up today seeing that the French Navy cut 9 of the FREMMS from the program :mad::rolleyes:

    9? I thought that they had only cancelled 6, 11 down from 17?

    in reply to: Somali Pirates vs USN and Russian Navy! #2068868
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Kenya purchased 77 T-72 tanks from Ukraine in 2007 according to UN arms register. This is just a follow up order.

    It would make sense, these would be dirt cheap and probably ex soviet examples.

    in reply to: Somali Pirates vs USN and Russian Navy! #2068891
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    It is a bit surprising that Kenya would be making a major arms purchase so soon after the recent ethnic violence and the formation of a divided coalition government.

    On the other hand, the there would be tremendous difficulties in transporting T-72 tanks overland to Southern Sudan, where much of the terrain is unsuitable for MBTs, especially in the rainy season.

    Its Africa, since when did defence procurement follow logical thought processes? Anyway Kenya would not be that shocking and this haul is almost certainly second hand and probably sold at near scrap value anyway.

    in reply to: Blackjack attacks Hull… #2466563
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    I think it’s a non-story the release of which was just timed to coincide with the Tory party conference.

    that does not make any sense, stuff like this gets reported regularly, what is unusual is your choice to make a thread out of it. I frequently see stuff like this printed in UK news papers.

    On the issue of Hull, it would probably take the rest of the UK a month to realise it had been nuked anyway and a dose of radiation might improve the gene pool up there.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2068908
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Where’s the data then? :rolleyes:

    Have you ever heard of the word ‘conversation’?

    in reply to: Somali Pirates vs USN and Russian Navy! #2068921
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    No they did not. They’re actually quite “upset” about this (and demonstrated their goodwill re stability in the region by sending helos to the UN/EU forces in Tchad) and using this to bolster their claim that Ukraine is selling arms to whoever wants wherever there is some bucks to get (which is in some way true, just remember the sale of cruise missiles to Iran). The tanks come from old sov surplus, which Ukraine has loads of. Russia has till now abided by all UN resolutions regarding offensive arms sales in conflict regions (pre-empting possible objections, Iran and Syria are not considered “conflict zones” by the UN).

    Kenya is claiming that the vessels are for their military only before we get too carried away with the Ukraine bashing……the truth has yet to be found.

    in reply to: Britain considers JSF pullout #2466580
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    I never mentioned FREMM or its capabilities and it has nothing to do with PA2. And just saying it was because France wanted too excessive equipment or that they couldn’t afford it (period) when there were numerous other things going on, I am afraid I’ll just have to agree to disagree on this one.

    As far as the F-35 story goes, I have to agree that its a non-story. The CVF and F-35 go hand-in-hand. The MoD won’t cancel.

    FREMM has everything to do with it, the hull numbers have been slashed and a comparatively poor mans version procured not because the evil British undermined it but because France can not afford it. That is why PA2 has gone.

Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 5,730 total)