Maybe not the best looking or sexiest cancelled UK projects, but two that woould have helped UK industry…and aviation in general.
The V-1000 airliner. Based on my hero Bill Gunston’s comments in
“Plane Speaking”, it would have given the 707/DC-8 a real competitor. If successful…and developed into a sseries of jetliners…it would have saved (for lack of a better word) the UK airliner industry. Just think of a healthy complete industry, instead of just being a parts supplier to the French & Germans.
I’ll 2nd the V1000…was it also known as the VC7???
Transatlantic non stop, before the 707 could. And it had round windows! 🙂
RIP warrior.
104 metres of tunnel, 340 feet. Pace that out and see just what they achieved to escape…with rudimentary tools and even worse pit props.
Truly amazing people.
There were gaps of at least 20 minutes between some of the displays. They put the models up twice, 3 hours apart, and there was at least two displays of the aerobatics team (Sorry name escapes me). The parachute drop by the RAF, with the build up of literally watching the Chinook approach….then climb to it’s altitude……then position itself for the drop zone…..they managed to pan that event out for an hour!!!
The Chinook show that followed it was superb, as was the Typhoon.
Even the event tents were about 50% down on previous years. Most ground space was given up to what can only be described as a giant car-boot sale but without the quality.
As I said, I’ve been going for 12 years at least..it used to be free too!
Then, leaving the event by car can only be described as disorganised, ill thought out. No sense of order, no clear directions to filter the traffic away, surrounding roads remained open to non-show traffic.
Need I go on?
The Woodvale model weekend is a better event, more value for money, with more things to do in addition to admiring the flying displays of the models.
Yup Hangar 1 & 2 plus the apron (where we play 🙂 ) were all part of the preservation order.
This should help give a better idea of whats left (picture is about 2 years old but doesnt affect things). http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&time=&date=&ttype=&q=liverpool+airport&ie=UTF8&ll=53.347259,-2.879705&spn=0.005713,0.014462&t=h&z=16&om=1
Jon
Cheers muchly.
Is there to be a “Fly in” for the celebrations in June?
That picture has been round the world on other forums, the conclusive opinions, given time of day, attitude and declination are that it is the International Space Station.
I went on the Sunday. The Reds opened instead of closing the show. Altogether a very disapointing airshow 2007. I have been for the past 12 years but I won’t be paying for that show again.
Great shots btw.
Courtesy of the internet –
Connie –http://kenfielding.fotopic.net/p44963335.html
Jon
The Hangar in the rear of this shot….is it still up? Did it get listed along with the old terminal?
The Soviet Union fell no doubt about it, but Russia is still alive and will continue alive for many years, to say the Russians and Soviet were not great is a lack of historical honesty, here are some example of Soviet technology that never were surpassed by the West before the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1990
Yak-141 in 1990 had no known western equivalent its cruise engine was completly ahead of any western design and was retaken in the JSF.
An-225 had no Western equivalent in the West and still has not any counter part in 2007, its closest equivalent was the C-5 in 1990 but the Galaxy still yields to the An-124, the An-225`s little brother
Mi-26 it had no western equivalent in 1990.
Ka-52 had no western equivalent
Tu-22M had no western equivalent and was a quit complex machine
in fact i will say that the Soviet Union collapsed but its technology was not behind the west in terms of aircraft, the Su-35 was in no way behind any fighter the west built up to 1990
If the Soviet Union would had not collapsed in 2000 they would had many increadible machines, a nuclear aircraft carrier with Yak-141s, several hundred Su-35s and some MiG 1.44s, however its collapse was a product of a revolution that at the end if well taken will make Russia a wealthy nation, if not turn Russia again in a super militarized nation.
And by the way this man is an example of Soviet Greatness
First man in space:
Yuri Gagarin made his historic flight on April 12, 1961First space “walk” by a man:
A.A. Leonov, “Voskhod-2” – March 18, 1965First space station:
“Salyut” – April 19, 1971.First space “walk” by a woman:
S. E. Savitskaya, “Salyut-7” – July 27, 1984.Longest space flight – more than one year:
V.V.Polyuakov – 437 days, 17 hours, 58 min, 31 sec (continuous flight); 678 days, 17 hours, 33 min, 18 sec (total flight time).
What an outstanding post. Our own propaganda allowed us to believe that it was Rusky copying the west, but it is more likely that we followed the Russians. They certainly had more brain power working on the projects, just not as much money.
I miss the cold war. No questions on defence spending, hundreds of thousands of secure jobs, just think how far ahead the technology would be right now…on both sides of the curtain.
The real enemy was never Russia, we had more trouble with the usual rabble, that rabble is still at it now.
I used to play Table Tennis. Then I played a County champ……….I then realised I’d been playing Ping-Pong.
I’ve been taking photo’s seriously since 1979, but some shots on here make mine into snaps.
Hej PL 🙂
Sigma 55-200 is way to slow for “jetshooting”, I tried a friends lens and could not get back to my lenses soon enough. Your camra is plenty good, but the lens holds you back.
A Canon 70-200 F4 L USM is a good place to start. I got mine 2 years ago and use it for almost anything,and it turns out grate images. I also have a 1.4 extender that I use every once in a while. I usually stop it down 2 steps and the images are tack sharp and contrast is lovely.
I got the 100-400 IS L lens, both because I liked the extra range, and the IS. The image quality is very nice indeed. It’s a bit soft @ 400 MM wide open, but stop it down 2 steps and IS mode 1 works wonders, I got shots pin sharp down to 1/50 @400mm and F8
Being perfect at panning also helps. Splendid shots, all worthy of magazine publication.
The answer is already above.
It goes back to our Naval heritage.
The odd balls that have tried to swap the boarding side were just trying out different ideas. The world standard is board from Port.
No but you figure it’s kicking out a LOT of high velocity air compared to a Harrier.
It was.
The more you read about Yak 141, the more you realise the JSF picked up on the ideas and made them work.
You know these things have a funny habit of evolving with time – it’s just not in the plan now as far as I’m aware. Phantom II’s comment on Harrier is right on. Funadmentally, VL recoveries aboard ship don’t require the same precautions as conventional carrier recoveries (eg organic tanker in the overhead) because with VL the boarding rate is close to 100%. No bolters, few wave-offs, even in high sea state. At the risk of creating a hugely controversial thread: it’s all together a more gentlemanly way to recover aircraft at sea!
Why land and then stop when you can stop and then land?:diablo:
(Note however, to complicate the points made above, the UK is looking closely at what are called Ship Rolling Vertical Landings – I will put something on my website about this in due course).
There was a converted/adapted T10 for this at some time.
They were reckoning that an F35b could land with a full load of stores, or near enough.
Note also the MiG-29 with what looks like Postit notes on the forward fuselage and fin – maybe RAM coating tiles ??
Ken
RAM tiles don’t have gaps between them like that. And why remove most but leave some?
Look like a series of flight sensors to me.
I have said this before on this forum and I will happily say it again. In my opinion the F-35B is one for the most important long term projects the DoD has at the monet, the reason being the flexibility that it will give to LHA/LHD fleet. If neccesary they type will allow the the USN/USMC to surge to 20+ carriers not to mention the other benefits this will give.
Totally agree. Without the VSTOL, the 35 is just another stealth. The whole reason for the F35 programme is the VSTOL capability…and it wll bear fruit.
I was involved in the JSF days but I’ve not been involved in the 35 since it was won, and now only involved (By pure coincidence) on some machined items.