dark light

Aeronut

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 136 through 147 (of 147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Blackburn B2 #1351404
    Aeronut
    Participant

    I was part of the Aeroplane Collection team that collected the B2 Cockpit section from the ATC unit at Caterham along with their Rover W2B engine (now at Cosford). I remeber the delight we took when we went to Hendon on the way back. A quick look at their Whittle engine and then comparing it to ours much to the confused looks from passers by. I also remember taking the B2 to an airshow at Sleap and watching a bemused public trying to figure out what it was.

    in reply to: The Last Drop – new WW2 film #1351413
    Aeronut
    Participant

    Just exactly what are para regiment doing going to war in a Horsa?
    Not all red berets were paras. Far less than 50% of the troops at Arnhem arrived by parachute or wore the para wings.
    Anyway, call that a Horsa – I wouldn’t.

    in reply to: AAM Duxford #1355075
    Aeronut
    Participant

    If its about architecture it’ll be all about the triumph over function that the AAM is.
    The AAM is aweful, cramped, atrocious lighting (if its sunny outside – on those rare occasions when it’s not raining – its difficult if not impossible to see anything inside properly), and it has aircarft suspended on wires. Oh and lets not forget, its full of un-interesting American rubbish.

    in reply to: R.A.E. Farnborough Fairchild Packet #1369599
    Aeronut
    Participant

    If anyone is interested I have the AP for UK supply drop from the C82 and C119 in my collection, first issued in 1953.

    in reply to: R.A.E. Farnborough Fairchild Packet #1371795
    Aeronut
    Participant

    Was it possibly a USAF C119 being used for the development of the Medium Stressed Platform (MSP)?
    The MSP which is still in British service today was devised to replace the WWII crash pan method of parachuting heavy items and was originally dropped from USAF C82 and then C119 whilst the Beverley was being developed. The lack of clearance to drop the MSP from the Beverley in 1956 meant that the heavy drops that went into Suez were the old system using the Hastings.

    in reply to: Aviation television channel #1381683
    Aeronut
    Participant

    Anything so long as they didn’t expect the audiance to morons with the attention span of a goldfish. Continually repaeating something said two minutes ago is not for me

    in reply to: Queen of the Sky #1396805
    Aeronut
    Participant

    Hasting Bomb beams

    The Hasting bomb beams (yes there were two) acted as the load spreaders for the underslung heavydrop loads and or CLE containers. As far as I know the last time the Hastings did a heavy drop was Suez when Jeeps were airdropped. As the Medium stressed platform had entered service and replaced the crash pan technique used for the Hastings and Halifax before it.
    Why no MSP at Suez? It was only cleared for use from the C119 and of course the yanks were not on our side for that one.
    So for Suez the old technique was reserected and the ‘Museum’ at AATDC Old Sarum was robbed for the equipment.

    in reply to: Halifax v Stirling question #1421191
    Aeronut
    Participant

    The Stirling had a role after Bomber Command – Airborne forces. Glider tug and parachute aircraft, the same as the role as Halifax but the Stirling could carry more internal stores / parachutists than the Halibag so was used more on para ops.
    By the way anyone got any photos of Mk 1, Mk V, or Mk 9 Spits towing Hotspur gliders.

    in reply to: A few thoughts about IWM Duxford #1421195
    Aeronut
    Participant

    JDK mentions Stonehenge and the fact that there isn’t an airfield there. There is, but its one for the archeologists. If they ever get aroun to digging the tunnel for the A303 they will be destroying evidence of a WW1 airfield.
    Also let’s not forget that the road works that will be required to avoid Stonehenge will have an imapact on Airman’s corner – the memorial to the worlds first military aircarft accident.

    in reply to: MSI, Manchester #1426797
    Aeronut
    Participant

    I fear its gone the same way as other museums that took the government’s shilling and went back to free admission.
    They have to supply so much space for school parties they made space by removing the displays.
    Hendon is worse they took the corporate shilling as well and the side galleries (not to mention the Dermot Boyle wing) were lost to displays.
    Hendon also comitted the cardinal sin for museums during its redesign. – Its possible to go around the museum (all parts) and NOT pass through the shop.

    in reply to: Museum Of Army Flying #1355429
    Aeronut
    Participant

    The Rotabuggy was flown at RAF Snaith, but It went with AFEE to Beaulieu. But not before it lost its rotor and tail feathers. There is a photo of it (a Jeep with a tall windscreen) towing a trailer on which there is a FA330 gyro kite. If it is the real jeep at Wallop maybe its time to build the rotor system properly now that the original drawings have been found. Anyoner know if ML still have the drawings for the tail – it was built by R Malcolm Ltd at Slough (part of the ML Avaiation empire)

    in reply to: Museum Of Army Flying #1356037
    Aeronut
    Participant

    The rear fuselage of the Hotspur is an original (although neither of the two serial numbers it carried are that of the finished scheme. The Blitz buggy replica is a fair representation when compared to the original drawings in the museum. Hanging above it is what can only be described as Little Nellie’s grandmother the Haffner Rotachute.

Viewing 12 posts - 136 through 147 (of 147 total)