I can’t remember the exact wording but they’re not even polite about it. “You will leave your camera/phone here…”
Add to that the surly bloke behind the counter/ticket desk, and even the cat in the shop was stroppy.
It seems to be the museum’s principle to be rude.
I would love to have seen it when we briefly visited back in September, but as they’re still convinced that all their potential visitors are crooks, I still take the view that they’re a***holes and didn’t go in.
I think I can see what JB’s getting at to a certain extent. I was never a prolific poster on WIX, as said it’s understandably American-centric, so half the time I’ve no idea what they’re on about and what I do understand, I don’t know anything about.
I have noticed that in recent years, I post considerably less often on the site, although I’ve never tried to analyse why.
As an aside – pilots, maintainers and operators had started to bale out from this site, even before it crashed and burned.
Fed up with armchair “experts” I seem to recall was one reason…
Working fine here. First time I’ve checked since 10-ish this morning.
Primary sources being absolutely reliable of course, such as RAF combat reports involving He100 or He113 fighters, and Luftwaffe reports of combat with Spitfires when they were actually Hurricanes.
You’re one who asked if a publisher had provided any references but OK, I’m sure you’re right.
Since you didn’t like my suggestion, a quick google finds that “Plane Speaking” by Bill Gunston was published by Patrick Stephens in 1991.
Available from Abebooks and presumably other places.
Stephans is presumably Patrick Stephens, the publishers.
Trumper. Their thinking was that aircrew might bale out rather than fight.
Generals etc., with the intelligence and common sense of a cheese sandwich.
So, it sounds as if the huge hangar is still unsafe for the public to enter.
I appreciate it would cost shedloads of £££, but given the rarity of some of the “exhibits”, I would have thought that fixing it ought to be a priority.
Having fixed it, they could then charge for entry, as other Science Museum outstations do, to start recouping the costs.
Obviously far too obvious for the halfwits that seem to be be in charge of national aviation museums these days.
mothminor, where does it say that the reserve collection at Wroughton has reopened?
There’s nowhere on the website that I can see that refers to it being open.
I saw some of it briefly while at an airshow there in the very early ’90s and would love to see it properly.
It is a spammer, but an incompetent one. He’s posted Dave’s link as is, without adding the spam section to the end of it.
It’s another one of those split links that appeared a few months ago.
JB – Yes, I was joking, but how could I be expected to know that all B-52s have rippled forward fuselages? That’s the only one I’ve ever seen, apart from the one that did a circuit over the last Finningley Air Show in 1993 and apparently headed straight back to the States.
Unlike you, most English, or British people if you prefer, don’t spend a lot of time on USAF bases. None in my case. apart from an open day at Bentwaters in 1980-ish and the Mildenhall Air Show in 1986.
Back to Duxford. The current Google maps satellite overlay has enough detail to correlate with adrian_gray’s 1946 map. It seems that it was extended, slightly to the West but mainly to the East. As the truncated runway is long gone, it’s not possible to see how much.
Common sense dictates that the aerodrome must have been extended, probably considerably.
When the Air Ministry, War Office, whatever it was then acquired the land it would have been adequate for piston-engined biplane fighters.
I find it hard to believe that in later years Concorde and other jet airliners, a Vulcan, Victor and number of fast jets could get into the same patch.
I know the building of the M11 was held up until Concorde had flown in but a lot have arrived since then.
Having said all that, the forward fuselage of the B52 is seriously rippled, suggesting it was braking so hard it was about to concertina.