A bit of competition is what we need to keep a greedy duopoly in line
true.. a very good example of this is India. India at the moment has around 5 loco’s, and the competition is very stiff, resulting in fantastic fairs all around the year. 🙂
Sounds quite a big entry into MEL by AI. Any news on frequencies and ac to be used on the routes?
Its not AI, its IC. IC plans to lease A330s for these flights. I had been lobbying for this route for 2 years and the idiots start it when i am shifting out of Australia. 😡
IC will have stiff competition though, TK, AI/QF, SQ, CX, Malaysian offer very good connections to Australia, specially Melbourne. SQ being the best of the lot, in terms of connectivity, by offering two daily flights to Melbourne.
Few things that might give IC the edge is if they have mid-day or mid-afternoon flights out of India, sparing passengers the congestion vows being faced at hubs like Delhi and Mumbai these days.
I like the timing they have chosen to enter the market, best of luck too them.
HEADSHOT!!
sorry..could not resist. 🙂
werent there reports RyanAir might bid for AerLingus again?:confused:
That Embraer deal is almost ready to be signed apparently, and the 126 fighter jet deal might be announced by Sunday.
Good to see the birds coming in now.
A HAL Dhruv of the Sarang team crashed yesterday, killing one of the pilots.
Qatar was rumoured to be a 380CJ customer.
Are you still going to fly Kabir?
I hope BA dont stop refunding passengers who requested it before today so they could rebook on another service!
yes…but i got a refund and rebooked with 9W for mid-Feb.
well that was pretty inconvinient.
I’d like to see what the sales figures would be if it’d been in production the same amount of time as the 737 series
completely depends on how the LOCO boom progresses.
I like it..has a great retro touch to it.
Strike was delayed by 24hrs now from 29th to 30th Jan.
so not 31st anymore?
As far as I understand it…
This situation is only likely to occur after some form of ground handling incident and the the aircraft is required for operations until a replacement or repairs can be carried out. There is little perceivable asymetric handling effect (none in a FBW Airbus) of having one missing however there is a small performance reduction. The manufacturers have to provide an extensive set of performance data with certain items of equipment missing so, bearing in mind you would have to be incredibly unlucky (stupid?) to dink two wingtips at the same time and removing a serviceable winglet doesn’t really help you, there is no real point in doing the approval for this situation.
Thanks for the explanation Wys. Another question… even if flying with one winglet does it create an imbalance in wind drag at all? Or is it just ignorable?
I’d never have imagined that to be the case! Is that for a specific technical reason or does it simply make the aircraft too uneconomical to fly?
Paul
thats an interesting note wys… i doubt its because it turns the aircraft uneconomical Paul, the 743 is around the same specs to that of a 747, so i doubt any economics would invoved. I would think vortices would play a major role in a 744/a340 not bing able to take off without both winglets, although i am stumped how one winglet can be effective without its partner on the other wing, as only one winglet would work, by re-orienting the winglet lift vector forward, thus cancelling parts of the drag.
The other possibility can be in the wing design, as if one winglet is there it can shed its work load by running the plane on specific speeds?