I am particularly interested in this part of the article:
Jet Airways (India) has been reported by Jet Airways (US). Could this be an attempt by Jet-US to keep Jet-India out to keep their brand name their own?
absolutely, maybe this Jet Airways of USA plans an expansion in future and is trying to curn 9W’s growth. A very sadistic attmept i must add.
These A v B are extremely pointless and boring. Especially when someone gets all technical and financial with it. :rolleyes:
agreed… my postings here have gone down dramatically because there is hardly anything to say.
Th elink posted by KabirT clearly illustrated what AI Express was looking for and I find myself believing that the A32X might have been the better choice. Now I know that you shouldn’t always believe the press or I am not saying that the 737NG is an inferior product. All I am saying is that Airbus may have had a reason to question the selection process.
questioning is fine, but if the party cannot answer it because the deal was based on a political level and not an ailrines immediate need level it is very hard to give any answer to Airbus for AI. Airbus, knows that the deal was heavily politicised but they are still making a big deal out of it.
So why did this topic go from outsourcing to universities?
Anyway, It is as simple as companies making more profit in India and China in human resource labour than being sensative to people saying they have to spell out there name these many times to make them understand. Face it, the average person in an Indian call centre gets about say 7000-8000 Indian rupees. That is roughly 200-300 pounds a month. Now why would a company have there call centres and employ hundreds in developed nations where even the minimum wages are higher than what companies pay here. They would rather listen to your compltains about you not being able to communicate with the eprson sitting in India than change the whole system the other way around.
Another main reason why these companies set up there offices here, other than cheap labour IS the Indians English language skills. Face it, if an American goes to UK he might have the trouble of understanding it, even when they both know there english well. Now if you put up offices in say CIS countries you will have some heavy problems with the language there as English is no where your everyday dilect, unlike in India. This is also the reason why China does not have the lead in call centres.
On a personal note i dont mind these call centres in India as much as people compltain there English is bad and what not. They are generating employment and thats the biggest pro of this.
So why did this topic go from outsourcing to universities?
Anyway, It is as simple as companies making more profit in India and China in human resource labour than being sensative to people saying they have to spell out there name these many times to make them understand. Face it, the average person in an Indian call centre gets about say 7000-8000 Indian rupees. That is roughly 200-300 pounds a month. Now why would a company have there call centres and employ hundreds in developed nations where even the minimum wages are higher than what companies pay here. They would rather listen to your compltains about you not being able to communicate with the eprson sitting in India than change the whole system the other way around.
Another main reason why these companies set up there offices here, other than cheap labour IS the Indians English language skills. Face it, if an American goes to UK he might have the trouble of understanding it, even when they both know there english well. Now if you put up offices in say CIS countries you will have some heavy problems with the language there as English is no where your everyday dilect, unlike in India. This is also the reason why China does not have the lead in call centres.
On a personal note i dont mind these call centres in India as much as people compltain there English is bad and what not. They are generating employment and thats the biggest pro of this.
Why don’t the Indians point out the parameters that ultimately favoured Boeing? That would mean end of discussion – wouldn’t it?
does that really need to be answered!!! 😀
its cuz of this..
Boeing could overtake Airbus this yr in aircraft orders – EADS CFO
FRANKFURT (AFX) – European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co CFO Hans Peter Ring said Boeing Co could reach its goal of taking Airbus Industrie’s’s top spot in aircraft orders this year.
Airbus will, however, retain its first position this year in aircraft deliveries, he told an investors’ conference here.
He said Airbus keeping its position in orders this year could prove difficult as Boeing has been lowering its prices ‘very aggressively’ over the last few months.
really dont care about that…its their professionalism i am bothered about.
Why are they doing that? And more importantly, why hasn’t Qantas mentioned anything?
I think Qantas has made a comment on how dissapointed they are with Airbus because of the delay.
DEL and BOM have started work on it.
big indeed…so whenever we travel someone can but drugs into baggaes…scary thought.
B737-200ADV – Alliance Air, Indian Airlines
B737-300 – East West Airlines
B737-400 – Jet Airways, Air Sahara
B737-500 – Jet Airways
B737-700 – Jet Airways, Air Sahara
B737-800 – Jet Airways, Virgin Blue
B737-900 – Jet Airways
B747-300 – Qantas, Ansett
B747-400 – British Airways, Lufthansa, KLM, Singapore Airlines, Qantas, SAA
B757 – Royal Nepal Airlines
B767 – United Airlines, Qantas, Ansett, SAS
B777 – Singapore Airlines (loads of times)
Airbus A300 – Indian Airlines, Lufthansa
Airbus A310 – Air India
Airbus A320 – Indian Airlines
Airbus A330 – Swissair
Airbus A340 – Air France
MD 80/82 – SAS
IL 62 – Aeroflot
ATR 42/72 – Jet Airways
Dornier 228 – Vayadut (now defunct)
BAe 146 – Druk Air
these are from top of my head.
That is a fair judgment… has anyone flown with CSA? How are they like?
I actulally was surprised Egypt Air had not done this yet. They have been planning to induct the NG’s for ages. Oh well…good for them and Boeing.
Great news for Boeing and it 737 programme. 🙂
This thread reminded me of an amusing true story concerning the last Qantas 707 revenue flight
Qantas flew it’s last 707 trans Tasman service, Auckland/Sydney, in 1979.
Some weeks prior to the flight it became obvious that demand would exceed seat availability as airliner buffs near and far booked for what would be a sentimental journey.
Qantas in Auckland telexed head office: “Due heavy demand by aviation buffs for seats on final 707 flight (QF44 AKL-SYD 25 MAR ) suggest substitute 747.”
hahaha classic!