dark light

KabirT

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,261 through 4,275 (of 6,864 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A Question on LH #755980
    KabirT
    Participant

    Yea i contacted LH and they confirmed no PTVs on there B744s.

    in reply to: Pic of the Morning #755981
    KabirT
    Participant

    Originally posted by kev35
    Wysiwyg.

    If you have timw can you explain what this rotational movement is and how it affects the aircraft please?

    Thanks,

    kev35

    Mind if i take a shot Wys!:p

    Kev aircraft rotation movement is scheduled planning which effectly supports in creating optimized timetables, thus increasing aircraft productivity.

    in reply to: Another pic! #2083535
    KabirT
    Participant

    Les….yes i will scan that pic for u.

    Ant very correct info. sir!

    in reply to: An 22 #755982
    KabirT
    Participant

    that pic is taken at Osted Belgium only.

    in reply to: Another pic! #2083635
    KabirT
    Participant

    there is nothin valuable or operation in the museum that one can aim or spy on. Thats the reason.

    in reply to: Pic of the Morning #756096
    KabirT
    Participant

    Originally posted by skycruiser
    This plane is currently parked up at Hong Kong at the moment.
    Just for some useless info, some crew have been air sick on the new A340-600 due to a circular movement of the aircraft because of the long body. Just thought you might like to know!!!!

    for my liking this bird is way too long….now what u mentiones Skycruiser…a serious defect in aircraft design?

    in reply to: Happy Birthday Comet! 16/4/2003 #1992097
    KabirT
    Participant

    Happy B’Day Comet!

    U gotta treat me to a Heneiken!:D

    in reply to: General Discussion #426461
    KabirT
    Participant

    Happy B’Day Comet!

    U gotta treat me to a Heneiken!:D

    in reply to: Newer planes becoming more smooth? #756113
    KabirT
    Participant

    Originally posted by greekdude1
    A 14 hour LAX-SYD flight on a fully loaded 744, I’m assuming would be pretty darn near full power on take off. The plane is pretty much shaking as it rotates. Still much smoother than the classic 747’s especially the -100’s, in particular the landings. On TWA’s 747’s in the early 80’s, it felt like we were bouncing around on the landing, untill all 18 wheels were on the ground. It’s not like that at all on the 744, or even a 743 for that matter. On a 777, you can’t even tell that you’ve landed, it’s so smooth.

    It will have to use full trust…but if wind conditions are very favourable it might not use it. I rememebr my SIA flight from SIN-MEL taking up almost the whole runway for take-off.

    in reply to: Newer planes becoming more smooth? #756118
    KabirT
    Participant

    Originally posted by wysiwyg
    A few points –

    Kabir’s turbulence summary is faultless.

    Pilots don’t advance the thrust levers on modern jets, autothrottles do after the pilots press the TOGA switches.

    Most take offs are completed with the thrust reduced (derated) to a minimum level that still guarantees adequate performance. This allows greater time between major overhauls reducing down time. Every now and then it is a requirement that we carry out a full power take off to ensure that the aircraft systems are still capable of generating full power. Also some locations (eg my departure out of Funchal yesterday) require a full power take off for performance reasons. From this you can see that the smoothness of take off thrust application is not type dependant but dependant on circumstance.

    Another factor worth considering is that short haul aircraft more frequently fly out of performance limited airports than long haul aircraft, eg Funchal, Aberdeen, Genoa, Guernsey, etc.

    regards
    wys

    dont the jet winds and ground winds also play a major factor in take-offs Wys?

    in reply to: Postcard pic. #756120
    KabirT
    Participant

    love it….what a gret a/c it is…thanx A330C!

    in reply to: Newer planes becoming more smooth? #756176
    KabirT
    Participant

    turbulance is not in the hands of the pilot nor in the hand of aircrafty…its in the hands of god. Although yes technology has helped making flight smoother but to a very large extent if turbulance is headed your way you have to go thruough it unless alter. are made.

    in reply to: Branson offers £1 for Concorde #756186
    KabirT
    Participant

    yep…airlines earn very little..from economy class….business and first is where they earn there big bucks.

    in reply to: Branson offers £1 for Concorde #756191
    KabirT
    Participant

    Originally posted by Bhoy
    Kab, she’s talking about BA using Club World and First as cash cows…

    did you know that filling the First Class cabin on an average Transatlantic flight covers the operating expenses of the whole flight, and whatever pax are in Club World/Economy are just profit?

    As regards Concorde’s price, well, I dunno enough about the running costs and the restrictions on R class travel to comment.

    oh ok thanx Bhoy for the correction…but still even in general terms i mean that.

    in reply to: LH to acquire Swiss ? #756219
    KabirT
    Participant

    IMO…i dont see that happening.

Viewing 15 posts - 4,261 through 4,275 (of 6,864 total)