RE: CVN 77 – Daddy Bush }
yea saw it on CNN…atleast he has served his country well and deserves it….. Bush Jr. will probably get a tug-boat with his name.
RE: What background do you have currently?
And this is mine…made it myself… 🙂 ….. can any one guess the guy with the guitar :9
Attachments:
RE: What background do you have currently?
And this is mine…made it myself… 🙂 ….. can any one guess the guy with the guitar :9
Attachments:
RE: My thoughts on security
ahhh yes wysiwyg thats it…. sorry i did such a huge mistake. 🙂
RE: Pic Of The Day
maybe he’ll give us all free tickets on his first flight! :9
RE: Blugh!!!!
I dont think if the engine being less powerful it will burn less fuel. Maybe it will conserve a little or use it a little rationaly……like the E class merc. is better on fuel than S…..but both are gas guzlers anyway! 🙂
RE: Pic Of The Day
[updated:LAST EDITED ON 10-12-02 AT 03:42 PM (GMT)]Yup my best wishes with skycruiser…. 🙂
RE: My thoughts on security
wysiwyg…..there was a crash in China or HK where pilot did it for suicide….i’ll try to look it up.
RE: Pic Of The Day
looking great!
RE: Blugh!!!!
Well i change my mind…its not good. Atleast with this c/s it will not barge into another a/c mid-air!
RE: Air NZ plane in emergency landing after engine fails
next time thins kind of thing happens with Air NZ…people should say Whats new?? This is happening too often.
RE: Blonde chick with a nice pussy!!
certainly did! 🙂
RE: Blonde chick with a nice pussy!!
certainly did! 🙂
RE: UA files for Bankruptcy
sad….the B777 and B747 look the best in UA livery!
RE: My thoughts on security
>I think the means to deal with a terrorist on board should
>come from within the passenger cabin and not the flight
>deck. If terrorists are hell bent on getting into the
>cockpit, then after 9/11 it’s fair to assume they will be
>intent on taking over and crashing the plane. I don’t think
>the days of politically motivated or asylum seeking
>hijackings are over, but I think anyone daft enough to try
>one can expect to be treated as a 9/11 style hijacker.
>Basically I mean that no matter the motive for a hijacking,
>then I would, as a passenger assume the worst and try to do
>something to stop it.
I agree on the point that tackeling hijackings should be from the cabin and not the cockpit. Plus the idea of putting a timer is not appropriate….the cockpit should not be made like a safe…..it should be easily accesable for the RIGHT purposes.
>Personally it’s a situation you don’t ever want to be in,
>but keeping weapons off of planes is a good start. If it
>comes down to straight fight between meagrely armed
>hijackers and cabin load of passengers of the assumption
>they may be about to be flown into a building, then I think
>the “overpowering” option will be the most effective. Yes,
>people will get hurt, but the other option is a sure and
>certain death for all on board.
Most hijacking scares are with a man with a knife or a small blunt instrument….passengers together can overpower these kind of situations anytime, thats diff. that 90% of them will not even try to breathe. An act like happened on BA flight from kenya(?) when the passengers with the crew overpowered the hijack attempt.
>
>Sky Marshals may be a good idea, or maybe not. Locking the
>cabin doors may be a good thing, or maybe not. I think
>keeping the flight deck away from the hands of hijackers is
>possibly of vital importance now. And as wysiwyg says,
>hijackers will resort to any means to get in there, even
>killing cabin crew and passengers over the interphone. But
>as horrific as that would be, it would be worse for all
>concerned if they got into the cockpit and took over the
>flight as we witnessed on 9/11.
Sky Marshals is an okish idea although effective as El Al has prooved but we have to keep in mind all flights cannot have Sky marshals. Now the terrorism links being spread world wide you cant put sky marshals in all flights..its impossible.