Interesting. But how many aircraft would be fitted with some kind of defensive system? If you’re talking of the whole fleet the cost would be astronomical. You can guarantee that the British Airways board wouldn’t take a pay cut to implement such measures so the cost would be met by the passenger.
“But she added: “Where there is a terrorist risk, we believe the most effective preventative is for the relevant authority to identify any likely launch site near airports.” “
For me that is the most worrying statement. How could you protect Heathrow from such an attack? A terrorist would ensure they have escape and evasion routes in place. Residential areas under Heathrow’s flightpath are like rabbit warrens and would be easy to ‘disappear’ into. A fanatical terrorist would have no regard for their own safety and would probably take greater risks to achieve their aim.
“……..any likely launch site near airports.”
Yet another opportunity to marginalise the spotter or the photographer. Myrtle Avenue is an excellent case in point. How long for that area is closed to spotters?
Regards,
kev35
Well, Ren, that was a terrible waste of money wasn’t it?
The first shot is worth the price of the camera alone. Stunning, but a 10D is a little expensive and a lot too cimplicated for me.
What time did the Air Malta flight leave?
Cracking stuff.
Regards,
kev35
The question is does it really matter what happened now? The important thing is that Janie is fine as are those who are nearest and dearest to her, and that she continues to pay tribute to the pilots of the 8th Air Force who flew P51’s in combat.
Surely, anything else is irrelevant.
Regards,
kev35
YES!!!!! That one’s 82kb and working fine. Big thank you to the Webmaster and to everyone who contributed to these threads in an attempt to sort the problem.
Regards,
kev35
Let’s try this then.
So the limit must be down to about the low 50’s in kb’s then. At least we’ve established what part of the problem is then. Check out the picture posting thread on the Commercial forum as well because Ren on that forum is getting a clickable link to all images now. Anyone else got that problem?
Regards,
kev35
Curiouser and curiouser, I’m getting the pictures fine not a link. Never had that problem.
Kev35
Which threads Ren?
One last effort for tonight having successfully posted a pic on the commercial forum by reducing a pic from 89kb to 51kb. See if the same works here.
BINGO!!!!! Webmaster, it somehow seems the forum software has reduced the size of the image it will allow us to post. All my photos have been below the 100kb limit, usually around 80 to 90kb but it will no longer accept them that size. Reduce them and it does. Hope this information helps.
Regards,
kev35
One last try for tonight. Made the picture smaller, see if that makes any difference.
And it’s worked. The original was 89kb and worked fine last week but has failed this week. Reduced to 51kb “600 x 400 pixels and it’s worked.
Would seem to suggest that size really does matter.
Regards,
kev35
Right, I’ve followed all the instructions given by the webmaster on the commercial forum thread AND requested a new password. Let’s see what happens this time…..
And still nothing. Mmmmmmmmm. :confused:
Regards,
kev35
Let’s give it a whirl…..
Still not working for me and a lot of others on the commercial forum. And I bet the ‘Last edited by….’ script doesn’t appear either.
kev35
And so, to paraphrase Squadron Leader Skipper in the Battle of Britain…. “Nothing….. Repeat nothing!”
Back to the drawing board? Is the fact that the bit about ‘ last edited by….’ going missibg of any significance?
Regards,
kev35
I’ll even try to attach a pic now….. Doh. This is all very confusing you know to a technophobe like me.
Thanks for that Ren.
I’ll try again….. :confused: