dark light

google

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 2,193 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Air Force gives F/A-22 poor marks #2672669
    google
    Participant

    Even the targetted mtbf of 5 hours for software is horrible. Sounds like it’s chock full of of expensive gizmos that might not work half the time.

    google
    Participant

    I must say that despite the corny acronym, the complete integration of functions is very impressive.

    in reply to: More complaints about F-16I #2672689
    google
    Participant

    What Iranian threat? I’d like to know. It doesn’t seem so much of a buildup as it is a modernization.

    in reply to: LO-MAC is a rean nice game #2672774
    google
    Participant

    I don’t think the extra 128megs in the 256 card really makes a difference when it comes to gaming. He just bought it to make us all jealous!:p

    in reply to: LO-MAC is a rean nice game #2672789
    google
    Participant

    Yes, but ATI only recently started to make Pro cards with 256 megs of onboard memory. So it’s probably a 9600 or 9800. I don’t remember if the 9700s came in a 256 version.

    in reply to: LO-MAC is a rean nice game #2672850
    google
    Participant

    Originally posted by Nikumba
    And whys that 🙂

    Nikumba

    I am jealous of your rig.:)

    in reply to: Coaler versions #2672853
    google
    Participant

    Originally posted by Flanker_man
    They had no ‘prior experience’ – don’t forget that the Yak-44 never flew, nor was it ever built.

    Oh, right.

    in reply to: LO-MAC is a rean nice game #2672946
    google
    Participant

    P4 3.06Ghz
    ATI Radeon 256Mb Pro 1280×1024 with full AA and AF
    1Gb PC2700 RAM

    That’s just sick…..

    in reply to: "Red Flag" IMAX Movie #2673006
    google
    Participant

    sweeet! Hope they give it some nice bass pounding ear shattering Dolby digital sound!

    in reply to: Coaler versions #2673009
    google
    Participant

    I thought I read that among the problems with the An-70, one was not having enough time to properly develop the engines/propellers. If that was the case, I don’t see why if they’ve had prior experience with the Yak-44.

    in reply to: LO-MAC is a rean nice game #2673013
    google
    Participant

    Originally posted by Vympel
    Either that, or your piloting skills need improvement. Killing a MiG-27 can be done with your eyes closed.

    Ramming speed!:)

    in reply to: Coaler versions #2673055
    google
    Participant

    Originally posted by Flanker_man
    It was ‘considered’ for carrier use – but was too heavy.

    As an alternative, Yakovlev developed the Yak-44 (E-2C lookalike) as a carrier-borne AWACS, but the breakup of the Soviet Union etc….

    http://66.226.87.135/images/yak-4401.jpg

    My pics of the large-scale model of the Yak-44 in the Yakovlev museum are at :- http://66.226.87.135/yak-44.htm

    Ken

    Does that yak-44 have similar propellers to the An-70?

    in reply to: LO-MAC is a rean nice game #2673766
    google
    Participant

    Very nice- keep ’em coming. So, how’re the kill ratios against the IAF? 🙂

    in reply to: LO-MAC is a rean nice game #2673784
    google
    Participant

    I didn’t know A-10s could refuel?

    Can you get a picture of you crashing into another plane? Mwaa haa ha.

    in reply to: strange Russian carrier aircraft !?!?! #2673981
    google
    Participant

    It almost looks like a hybrid Mig-21.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 2,193 total)