dark light

google

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,471 through 1,485 (of 2,193 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chile's Phalcon : The IAI Condor #2671398
    google
    Participant

    So how did they end up liking their AWACS then? That bulbous nose has got to be the ugliest implementation. Ever.

    in reply to: More complaints about F-16I #2671402
    google
    Participant

    Hmm, perhaps you’re right.

    in reply to: Gunship clip #2671607
    google
    Participant

    Also, it seems that the AC-130Us are rather lightly armed. Only 1 x 25mm Gatling, 1 x 40mm, and 1 x 105mm? Can’t they pack some more heat in there?

    in reply to: Gunship clip #2671612
    google
    Participant

    That’s some good footage. But, it showed the gatlings firing pretty long bursts?! Wouldn’t that cause the barrel to overheat?

    in reply to: Questions about Chinese aircraft #2671616
    google
    Participant

    1. Perhaps eventually, but production is probably currently geared towards equipping the PLAAF only at the moment.

    2. Good question.

    3. 96 K-8s have already been produced for PLAAF Flight Academies.

    4. No doubt the PAF sees the FTC-2000 as a LIFT for its JF-17 force, but it’s probably more of a basic/intermediate trainer. The PLAAF will likely hold a flyoff between the L-15 and FTC-2000 to see which one it will adopt (see AW&ST, 12/22/03)

    in reply to: Russian Navy CinC: New aircraft carrier, 2017 #2077302
    google
    Participant

    It seems that by the time 2017 roles around, aircraft carriers will be kind of outdated, no? They’ll have death rays and UFOs by then.

    in reply to: US's new CHARC #2671795
    google
    Participant

    It’s crazy. Well, just hope it works out well. Function over style.

    in reply to: US's new CHARC #2671810
    google
    Participant

    Didn’t say. Here’s an excerpt.

    “JDW was the first publication to report on the Covert High-speed Attack and Reconnaissance Craft (CHARC – pronounced ‘shark’), which the company unveiled last year (JDW 25 June 2003). In February, company officials discussed the concept in more detail.

    CHARC features a Small Waterplane Area Twin Hull (SWATH) design. It carries a crew of two in a forward cockpit that borrows much from the layout and technologies used in modern attack helicopters, said company spokesman Tom Greer. Later configurations could be unmanned.

    At the nose of the fuselage is a slewable 20mm rapid-fire gun. On each side of the forward fuselage are four internal weapons bays, each of which could hold one canisterised AGM-114 Hellfire missile or Joint Common Missile for line-of-sight engagements. The company says its nascent NetFires system could be incorporated for a beyond-line-of-sight attack capability. It could also mount 40mm grenade launchers.

    The company is marketing an 11m-long variant and a 12m-long version of the CHARC to the navy and US Special Operations Command, said George Root, director of advanced programmes at the company’s Maritime Systems & Sensors division. Although the craft could operate from a number of larger surface vessels, the company says its design is geared with the nascent Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) in mind. Several CHARCs could fit on the latter, according to the company.

    Lockheed Martin would like to build, with funding support, a 1/4-scale model to validate the CHARC’s stability in water. To date the company says it has invested about $2 million of its own funds. Root said the company believes that a prototype unit could be available in 2008 for experiments with LCS.

    The SWATH configuration gives the craft extreme stability even in high sea states, said Root. The diesel-powered vessel is fast and agile, even in unfavourable conditions, and has a top speed approaching 60kt. Its directional waterjets make it “extremely manoeuvrable”, he noted.

    The vessel’s design gives off only low infra-red, radar and visual signatures, said Greer. It can operate at varying heights above the water line, and has a retractable sensor mast. In addition to internal weapons carriage, its engine exhaust empties below the water line. The craft has a minimum draft of 1.5m to allow for operations in shallow water.

    The mast will provide a “great field of view” to locate, identify and track targets, says the company. The vessel’s sensor suite, located both in the mast and its nose, is to be determined, but will probably include a targeting forward-looking infra-red system, said the officials.

    Both variants of the CHARC incorporate a folding SWATH design, for which a patent is pending. This allows the vessels to collapse into a box 3.6m wide by 3.6m high for storage – a footprint only slightly larger than that of the existing 11m rigid hull inflatable boat (RHIB) used by Sea, Air and Land (SEAL) commando teams, said the officials. The craft has steerable wheels to manoeuvre when in compressed mode on the host ship. “

    *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance their understanding of arms trade activities, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I believe that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
    For more information go to:
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

    in reply to: US's new CHARC #2671820
    google
    Participant

    I forgot to mention, credit JDW March 4, 2004

    in reply to: Contract Signed (for the 10th time) #2671840
    google
    Participant

    Yeah yeah, when it actually lands at an airbase in India I’ll believe it.

    in reply to: LO-MAC is a rean nice game #2671855
    google
    Participant

    Hey griffin_pak,

    Can you run over those vehicles on the runway with your Mig-29?:)

    in reply to: More complaints about F-16I #2671874
    google
    Participant

    Oh, nevermind, I was thinking of your signature. I thought that had something to do with the simpsons.

    in reply to: More complaints about F-16I #2672001
    google
    Participant

    Yeah? I don’t remember that episode. Which one was it?

    in reply to: More complaints about F-16I #2672036
    google
    Participant

    Originally posted by F-18 Hamburger
    seems like half of the members here use a Matt Groenig (simpsons/futurama) avatar.

    Yeah, copycats. First it was SOC and I. Now Castor and IP Freely decided to use them. :p

    in reply to: Air Force gives F/A-22 poor marks #2672626
    google
    Participant

    Actually, I think most outsourcing of software writing goes to India.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,471 through 1,485 (of 2,193 total)