dark light

google

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,801 through 1,815 (of 2,193 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Upgraded Sukhois enter service with RuAF #2692631
    google
    Participant

    Anyhow, like you mentioned earlier. The situation is sketchy at the moment, and I would hate to be basing my arguments on one or two articles. We know that China is pursuing a modernization of its Su-27 fleet, but whether that will be through indigenous methods or Russian upgrade kits is still hazy.

    in reply to: Upgraded Sukhois enter service with RuAF #2692646
    google
    Participant

    So if they’re not upgrade kits, then what are they? Are they avionics kits to make them into the SM standard, perhaps as originally visaged so they aren’t upgrades?

    OK, so the other possibility is that there is a confusion over the matter, as you suggested.

    Uhm, you’re not Piotr Butowski, are you? PiBu? The thought just came to mind.:eek:

    in reply to: Upgraded Sukhois enter service with RuAF #2692649
    google
    Participant

    What is your proof that it is not true? I would require a direct link saying that 100 upgrade kits have not been delivered- failure to mention is not the same thing as not occurring.

    Pinkov is too vague in his descriptions of ‘sources from China.’ Unless the Technocomplex spokesperson is lying to Hewson (and why would he do that?), I have more reason to believe Hewson who it would appear physically met with said representative.

    Thank you, my typing error re: Piotr’s name.

    in reply to: Remember that Flanker pilot who forgot to drop his wheels? #2692662
    google
    Participant

    That’s fine- nothing wrong with getting a value card. PCI-Xpress is coming out in a few months, and then AGP 8X will be outdated anyhow…

    in reply to: General Discussion #398759
    google
    Participant

    I find it humorous to gaze upon his visage. that is all.:)

    in reply to: Flood’n’Anna’s Love-In #1977203
    google
    Participant

    I find it humorous to gaze upon his visage. that is all.:)

    in reply to: Velly Interesting news re: J-11s in PLAAF service #2692696
    google
    Participant

    Remember Richard Fisher’s report on MAKS 2003? He quoted a Sukhoi official as saying it would take China 10 years to indigenize the J-11; notice, that the official is not saying 10 additional years from now (2003), but rather ~10 years total.

    Contrast this with this from a 2003 JDW report- “Russian industry sources have also disclosed that China’s engine makers are close to mastering the complex skills needed to build the Su-27’s AL-31 powerplant – something that most observers had thought would be held under tight Russian control. If this proves to be the case, then China will have used the Su-27SK/J-11 project to establish a total systems capability for advanced combat aircraft in little more than 10 years.”

    Perhaps he meant 10 years from the 1995-96 contract to sign the Su-27 coproduction agreement.

    in reply to: Chinese Tu-4 AWACS #2692704
    google
    Participant

    Just how different was the Tu-4 from the B-29?

    in reply to: Upgraded Sukhois enter service with RuAF #2692707
    google
    Participant

    The upgrades can’t be for the Su-30s, because traditionally China has purchased all the upgrades up front on the MKKs, and there aren’t even 100 MKKs that need upgrading. Besides, the Su-27SM upgrades were “developed as part of China’s Su-30MKK two-seat multirole fighter project”. (JDW: 6/11/03, Piotr Butkowski) It wouldn’t make sense to upgrade a plane with technology taken from the plane itself.

    Secondly, the UBKs don’t need the upgrades- the frontline fighters do, and there aren’t even 100 available for upgrading.

    So what does that leave? The vast quantities of Su-27s and J-11s.

    Moreover, Hewson is a very senior editor. I think it’s more likely that Izvestia is not acquainted with the full facts.

    in reply to: General Discussion #398852
    google
    Participant

    How do you know it’s not true? Provide some sources at least to its inaccuracies.

    in reply to: It was about oil, and it was about dollars #1977258
    google
    Participant

    How do you know it’s not true? Provide some sources at least to its inaccuracies.

    in reply to: Upgraded Sukhois enter service with RuAF #2692773
    google
    Participant

    I disagree; he’s very specific about the upgrade (coming from the Su-27SM program). Kanwa is incorrect this time, or at least not telling the complete story in his article. All other Su-30 upgrades have been accounted for.

    in reply to: Whatever happened to Kamov's Ka-60 "Kasatka" #2692785
    google
    Participant

    I don’t think it’s been cancelled, but I don’t think there have been any buyers yet either.

    in reply to: General Discussion #398861
    google
    Participant

    Are Flood and Anna married? I’m afraid I don’t understand what’s going on… So in the dark.

    in reply to: Flood’n’Anna’s Love-In #1977266
    google
    Participant

    Are Flood and Anna married? I’m afraid I don’t understand what’s going on… So in the dark.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,801 through 1,815 (of 2,193 total)