Would a NOTAR helo be less susceptible to a missile blowing off its tail than a helo with a tail rotor? I would expect the rotorless tail to at least provide some stability…?

Gr8 pics.

The Maljutka anti tank missiles look like souped up Saggers?

Originally posted by PhantomII
Actually of the Argentine aircraft that were shot down in the Falklands all of them were using unguided bombs and getting in very close.

The Super Etendards of the Argntine Navy were successful in sinking two ships, and they were never even engaged (by Sea Harriers or ship-based defenses) much less shot down.

They were so low that I believe they were only on radar at the moment they popped up to launch their Exocets.

I’m not saying this would be the case nowadays, but just making a point to your comment about the Falklands.

Yes, I think the Argentinians dropped several of their iron bombs much below the arming altitude, resulting in the bombs failing to explode and their getting shot down.

Interesting- I would presume that the Chinese SD-10 is more akin to the R-77M, although surprisingly, the dimensions aren’t very much different. It supposedly has a lofted profile as well and better rocket motor.. Anyone have more specs on the -77M?

The updated Q-5D/E/Fs in PLAAF service can carry two 500kg LGBs and are believed to have a laser designation unit of sorts in the nose.

It’s a cheap rugged aircraft- probably won’t be a replacement for awhile.