dark light

google

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 2,193 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 168 from China #2074991
    google
    Participant

    Stealth is overrated for ships, IMO.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2653757
    google
    Participant

    Closing thread; you boys give yourselves a break and refrain from flaming please. You can restart a new thread when the 05 prototype comes out. 🙂

    google
    Participant

    But will conflicts of the future actually involve opposing fleets driving to within range of guns? I’m of the opinion that it won’t…

    in reply to: Greek Zubr #2075068
    google
    Participant

    Sorry Google Alepou 340MB is right, that pic of yours is a Ukrainian ZUBR. U420 Donets’k.

    No need to be sorry. I realized that after I posted the picture, but I was a bit too lazy to bother editing it. Thanks for the correction Alepou!

    in reply to: Amphibious assault! #2075154
    google
    Participant

    too bad it wasn’t a nude beach. hehe. 🙂

    in reply to: Delilah cruise missile drone #2060140
    google
    Participant
    in reply to: Carrier using nations.. #2075212
    google
    Participant

    Some tidbits on the Ronald Reagan from Maxim of all places….

    http://www.maximonline.com/the_ride/articles/article_5874.html

    in reply to: LCA Progress #2659809
    google
    Participant

    OK, great. So we have the project start year nailed down. So it’s not too long a program then.

    in reply to: Does the LCA program make sense? #2659852
    google
    Participant

    Yes, they can. My mistake. Thank you Victor.

    in reply to: LCA Progress #2659870
    google
    Participant

    Finally we can bury the 1983 “start” date that’s mouthed by lazy reporters including R. Bedi.

    Project definition stage was completed late 88. So the actual development of the plane started around early 89. I am assuming it took a few months to get the tranche of money for developmental phase. Btw, that is an underestimation of the time in the Indian bereaucratic system but we’ll go with that.

    However, this depends. FOr Western fighters, is the feasibility study included as part of fighter development?

    in reply to: Invincible for the IN #2075264
    google
    Participant

    Do you have a picture of the artist’s rendition? Would love to see that, thanks!

    in reply to: LCA Progress #2660306
    google
    Participant

    Whatever Jane’s said. (not the feasibility study date).

    in reply to: LCA Progress #2660316
    google
    Participant

    excellent, I’m glad we solved the question about the beginning date of the LCA program. That wasn’t so bad.

    in reply to: Invincible for the IN #2075267
    google
    Participant

    What’s going on with the status of their ADS, or are they not building that?

    in reply to: LCA Progress #2660324
    google
    Participant

    From JAWA – 2004
    Updated May 21, 2004

    Notice that the much quoted 1983 “start date” is nothing more than the begining of the feasibility study. Meaning that it was only meant to gauge the level of competency, money, and ability the prospective project required. Along with how much the project would cost, etc.

    Only in 1987 did the project definition stage start, which ended in late 1988. Still hardly much work was done on the actual plane. This phase was to nail down the capabilities the IAF wanted in the aircraft.

    It can be justifiably argued that the actual funding for the development of the plane only started around 1988-89 timeframe.

    The first flight from start of development took about 13 yrs. Admitedly lengthy timeframe due to the political, technical, and managerial hurdles the project had to manuever.

    So how much time will it take for the LCA to finish its flight tests and go into service?

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 2,193 total)