dark light

google

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 2,193 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Question about the Ninja #2686003
    google
    Participant

    It’s called the Ninja? Is that an unofficial name or what?

    in reply to: Forum smilies #1990646
    google
    Participant

    Agree with that Charlie Echo.

    in reply to: Russian Anti Shipping Missiles #2686436
    google
    Participant

    Oh, there’s a picture of the Granit on the same page as where you obtained your sandbox picture from.

    in reply to: USAF Future F/A-22 numbers #2686609
    google
    Participant

    Well, time will only tell (and more flight tests) whether the SW problem has really been solved.

    in reply to: Russian Anti Shipping Missiles #2686645
    google
    Participant

    Yeah i found it whilst googling for granite information i thought i would share it.

    Well i am not surprised the description is wrong and that they say their are not pictures of the system. some one on this forum posted pictures of the granite iirc, but its janes arrogant as ever if they havent posted them then it does not exist. ho hum…

    Jane’s has posted 4 pictures of the Granit; 2 of the missile itself, and 2 launching. It’s a very impressive missile- looks a bit like the Alfa/Yakhont? in fact.

    What I’d like to see is the SS-N-12 Sandbox. IIRC, no picture of that missile has ever been released.

    in reply to: USAF Future F/A-22 numbers #2686995
    google
    Participant

    Look at China and you’ll understand! Even those 277 are only a low peace time level.

    OK, China has what, like 200 4th gen fighters, and the US has several thousand?

    in reply to: Russia tests new S-400 missile #2687062
    google
    Participant

    Let’s hope it doesn’t come to that.

    in reply to: Russian Anti Shipping Missiles #2687242
    google
    Participant

    The Positiv-ME1 is a phased array with phase-frequency control of its beam in elevation. It can track air and sea targets. Can track 50 targets simultanously and is an x band radar with 360 degree coverage and 0-85 degree elevation coverage. Range is up to 150km and altitude from sea level to 30km. It can control up to 16 weapon systems simultanously and has automatic, semi automatic, self test and training modes. (source Russia’s Arms 2001-2002)

    that seems a little like overkill for the Kashtans?

    google
    Participant

    It’s not how much money you throw, but how you throw it and how it’s used.

    You can spend all that money on better education for all kinds of books, paper, supplies, extra schools and other crap but the fact is that still won’t improve your education when you are learning stuff in gr12 that the Europeans learn in gr9

    Then hire all the European teachers and bring them to the US- we can exchange. 🙂

    in reply to: Russian Anti Shipping Missiles #2687381
    google
    Participant

    Does anyone know what the Positive-ME radar is? Circled in red in the above picture. It’s one of the major electronics differences between the -EM version and the regular Sov.

    The Kashtan/Kortik system comes with 32 missiles, in 16 missiles per system.

    in reply to: Russian Anti Shipping Missiles #2687385
    google
    Participant

    I don’t see what the purpose of extending the flight deck is. It appears that it can still only fit 1 helo.

    in reply to: Good Mil Aviation Films #2687391
    google
    Participant

    There is another movie “FAILSAFE(1964)” like Dr.strangelove in B&W .

    The book was even better. The part you forgot to include was that the general in charge of bombing NYC had his wife and daughter there. I think he killed himself in the end. A rather bleak and depressing book, though very interesting.

    Catch-22 was pretty funny, though probably not the best military aviation movie.

    in reply to: Series standard Yak-130 makes first flight #2687440
    google
    Participant

    Please do not copy elsewhere- under the terms of usage, I am allowed one copy for personal/fair use/display, and I would rather not get in trouble for propagation of this article. thanks.

    Date Posted: 07-May-2004

    JANE’S DEFENCE WEEKLY – MAY 12, 2004

    ——————————————————————————–

    First flight for series Yak-130
    HENRY IVANOV JDW Correspondent
    Moscow
    Additional reporting by Michael J Gething JDW Aerospace Consultant
    London

    The first series-configuration Yak-130 twin-seat advanced jet trainer/ light strike aircraft flew for the first time on 30 April at the Sokol facility in Nizhny Novgorod, where the aircraft will be produced.

    The Russian Federation Air Forces (RFAF) plan to procure 200 Yak-130s to replace ageing L-39s as basic and lead-in fighter trainers with a secondary strike role.

    The first flight, planned for late last year, had been postponed several times. Sokol blamed the delays on late deliveries of components. RFAF commander Gen Vladimir Mikhailov has already admitted that there have been problems with the aircraft’s power plant: the ZMKB Progress AI-222-25 turbofan (rated at 24.5kN thrust).

    Six engines were delivered in 2003, and eight more are due this 2004, to equip the first batch of four series Yak-130s that Sokol must complete by the end of 2005. ZMKB Progress assembles the AI-222 turbofan (a production version of the DV-2S) in Zaporozhie, Ukraine. Moscow-based MMPP Salyut will undertake series production of the RFAF Yak-130 engines, using parts made at Ukraine’s Motor-Sich.

    This Yak-130 series configuration is a further development of the Yakovlev/Aermacchi AEM/Yak-130D demonstrator, which was first flown in April 1996 and has performed 485 test flights. The fuselage now has a smaller cross-section, featuring new nose and air intake profiles. The redesigned wing is smaller by 1.5m2, while the maximum take-off weight has been increased to nine tonnes.

    Kevlar armour protects the cockpit area and engines and the Zvezda K-36D ejection seats have been replaced with the newer D36LT3.5 version. In place of the original analogue (dial) instrumentation, three 6 x 8in multifunctional liquid-crystal displays equip the production aircraft. A new Elekroavtomatika-developed fly-by-wire flight-control system, which is reprogrammable to emulate various aircraft types, has been installed.

    For the strike role, the Yak-130’s eight hardpoints can carry a 3,000kg weapon load, including KAB-500 smart bombs, Kh-25 air-to-surface missiles, R-73 air-to-air missiles, Platan designator pod, free-fall bombs and unguided rockets.

    NPK Irkut now owns Yakovlev (JDW 5 May) and, according to Irkut president Alexei Fiodorov, investment in Yak-130 research and development has exceeded $100 million. However, it will still take “three to four years to get the product ready for export sales”, he says. Irkut hopes to sell more than 1,000 Yak-130s over the next 20 years at a unit price of $13 million.

    Meanwhile, in Italy Aermacchi began taxi trials of its own M-346 variant of the original Yak-130D on 28 April. The M-346 is fitted with a digital ‘steer-by-wire’ facility.

    *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance their understanding of arms trade activities, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I believe that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
    For more information go to:
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

    in reply to: Russian Anti Shipping Missiles #2687443
    google
    Participant

    Extended range only I bet. Probably more fuel added, and/or a bigger booster.

    Glenn, crobato, some new information from this week’s JDW re: the new Sovremenny 956EM and the upgraded Moskit.

    “Ordered through Russia’s state armaments export agency, Rosoboronexport, in January 2002 at a cost of just over $1 billion, the first Project 956EM destroyer was laid down late in 2002 and is due to be handed over to the PLA(N) in late 2005. The second ship was laid down in 2003 and is due for completion in 2006.”

    It appears that the different in weapons systems will be thus; “Main differences include the removal of the aft AK-130 twin 130mm gun mounting, replacement of the AK-630M close-in weapon system with the Kashtan inner-layer defence system and an extended flight deck. The Project 965EM ships will also carry an improved version of the 3M80 Moskit supersonic anti-ship missile. “

    I’m not sure if this is a typo or not, but Jane’s has the new Moskit variant listed as a 3M80MVE, and since the letter ‘v’ is close to the letter ‘b’, who’s to say Kanwa or JDW is correct?

    But, why pay $1 billion for 2 destroyers, when 2-3 052Bs could’ve built instead? Did the Russians have some sort of clause where they said, ‘you cannot buy the Kashtan and 3M80MB/VE unless you purchase the entire ship?’ It doesn’t make sense to me to purchase 2 additional ships whose capabilities may not be better than domestic ones (poor electronics capabilities, C4I on Russian ships I would imagine is worse), and which will take time to integrate into the domestic fleet. Why not just buy the upgraded Moskit and Kashtan separately, if that’s what they’re after?

    in reply to: Tech Question #2687505
    google
    Participant

    You mean he killed himself because he was gay?

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 2,193 total)