dark light

google

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 2,193 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What's the purpose of the horizontal dielectric bands? #2695321
    google
    Participant

    Hmm, well the article was referring to the Su-30MKK, and it specifically mentioned ‘dielectric bands’.?? So I’m a bit clueless. Could be the same as on the Rafale?

    in reply to: Prague divided over radar sale to China #2695324
    google
    Participant

    Originally posted by Vympel
    Well, Kolchuga systems were never found in Iraq, so presumably that sale never happened. I’m always leery of ‘allegedly’ nowadays.

    Right, just like the Kornets that knocked out US tanks.

    in reply to: Prague divided over radar sale to China #2695346
    google
    Participant

    The Kolchuga was presumably transferred to iraq, and allegedly 4 units were sold to China.

    in reply to: What's the purpose of the horizontal dielectric bands? #2695352
    google
    Participant

    Well, I was reading that an additional way to tell the difference between a Su-27 and a -30MKK was the presence of horizontal dielectric bands on the vertical fins. I’ve never heard of this before.

    I presume they mean these things on the fins?

    google
    Participant

    Originally posted by Arthur
    It’s a freelance job, you get paid per article. Word count, your own contract, that kind of work.

    I don’t know about the details with Jane’s, but expect a lot of haggling…

    Oh, that kind of sucks then.

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum Questions #2695549
    google
    Participant

    Will the PAK-FA go ahead with Indian funding?

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum Questions #2695561
    google
    Participant

    well, according to Tom Szulc’s article, the very last line states that ‘the idea to upgrade the Russian Mig-29s has been postponed indefinitely in favour of upgrading the Su-27.’ So not much going on on the domestic front, but the export modifications are pretty lively.

    in reply to: Su-34 #2695573
    google
    Participant

    Originally posted by GarryB
    The Backfire is one of my favourites and upgrades are supposed to keep it perky well into the 2020s.

    If the Badger and Stratofortress can keep soldiering on into the 21st century, it won’t be hard for the Backfire to do the same.

    in reply to: FC-1 deliveries to begin in 2006 to PAF #2695582
    google
    Participant

    Here’s an interesting piece of news- the PLAAF order may only be for 200, and these may not be for domestic service, but rather as ” ‘white tails’- stored for eventual sale to export customers.”

    source: Miltech, 2/04.

    in reply to: China receives first batch of Su-30MK2s #2695593
    google
    Participant

    The Feb. issue of MILTECH stated that the NIIP Panda radar is for the MKK2s, although I think it may be wrong. More likely the MKK3 batch, although, there hasn’t been any information about the MKK2 radar, besides being modifed to fire KH-31s.

    in reply to: Su-30MKM #2695596
    google
    Participant

    12 aircraft to be delivered in 2006.

    in reply to: Su-30MKM #2695600
    google
    Participant

    Just reading last month’s issue of MilTech, and it says that all avionics of Israeli origin will be eliminated. Sagem will supply the MFDs.

    in reply to: Prague divided over radar sale to China #2695616
    google
    Participant

    from the company website.

    in reply to: Prague divided over radar sale to China #2695628
    google
    Participant

    VERA-E Specifications

    Frequency range: 1,025-1,150 MHz (TACAN/DME interrogators); 1,090 MHz (IFF/SIF transponders); 0.1-1 GHz (option); 1-18 GHz (standard coverage); 18-40 GHz (option)

    Range: up to 450 km

    Coverage: 140ยบ (2-D configuration); 360ยบ (3-D configuration)

    Tracking capacity: up to 200 targets simultaneously

    Location accuracy: 20 m RMS (2-D*, side error – radar and IFF/SIF); 80 m RMS (2-D*, side error – TACAN/DME); 150 m (3-D**, range error (D = 15 km) – radar and IFF/SIF); 200 m (3-D**, altitude error – radar and IFF/SIF); 200 m RMS (2-D*, range error – radar and IFF/SIF); 400 m (3-D**, range (D = 15 km) and altitude errors – radar and IFF/SIF); 800 m RMS (2-D*, range error – TACAN/DME); 1,500 m (3-D**, range error (D = 30 km) – TACAN/ DME); 4,000 m (3-D**, range error (D = 15 km) – TACAN/DME)

    Crew: three drivers, three technicians and a system operator (2-D configuration)

    * 2 x 25 km geometry, target range of 150 km and 25 pulses being processed

    ** 3 x D km geometry, target range of 150 km, target height of 5,000 m and 25 pulses being processed

    Source: Jane’s Radar and Electronic Warfare Systems

    google
    Participant

    Too bad Pibu hasn’t been around recently, we could ask him. ๐Ÿ™‚

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 2,193 total)