Originally posted by SOC
All I have to say is…Bite my shiny metal ass
😀
What was the one word that Bender almost never says? Do ya remember that episode when they joined the army to attack the bouncing ball planet? Was it ‘please’?
Originally posted by SOC
Yeah they did, I forgot about that 😀
Speaking of Bond films, I can’t believe they’re thinking of not asking Brosnan back for the next one. Replacing him with Orlando Bloom?! would be horrible and negligent.
Hey, didn’t they use a An-124 (though probably CG) in that last James Bond film, Die Another Day?
sorry steve, but your title just sounds so sexual!
‘could be hung….’ lol.:)
Although, I do agree that the criminal should be punished.
sorry steve, but your title just sounds so sexual!
‘could be hung….’ lol.:)
Although, I do agree that the criminal should be punished.
Pity. Peter the Great is such a beautiful ship.
Pity. Peter the Great is such a beautiful ship.
Thanks! Another great reference. I suppose a better term for ‘destroyed’ would be ‘knocked out of action’, to cover the non-catastrophic results.
One more question for you Tony Williams- I believe I was reading through an old book on the P-47 (or was it the P-51?) that mentioned that pilots in ground attack missions shooting their .50s at the ground near a tank could cause the tank to flip over. Is there any veracity to those claims, or just an old wartime rumor?
Here’s what Neumann said from his interview:
“It depended. The T-34 had sloping armor so we had to attack it from a high angle and then it was like cheesecake. So, for the T-34, from the front was best. I considered the Josef Stalin tank the toughest….Our ammunition would not actually hit through but melt through. Thus, when it would hit the light armor it would melt through it but would not be able to melt through the main armor. The Stalin you could only hit between the turret and the body [the glacis?]…..”
Originally posted by google
Now, just what exactly precipitated the destruction of a tank in a Ju-87G attack? Was it the tank brewing up from penetrations of its ammo stowage, or just the shells penetrating and killing the crew? Just curious, but does anyone know about how many 37mm shells were needed to take out a T-34?
OK, I was just re-reading an old interview in Military History (August 2001) with Neumann, famed Ju-87G pilot, and it would seem that many of the tanks he fired on went up in catastrophic explosions. Sounds like the ammo and everything else cooking off.
Now, just what exactly precipitated the destruction of a tank in a Ju-87G attack? Was it the tank brewing up from penetrations of its ammo stowage, or just the shells penetrating and killing the crew? Just curious, but does anyone know about how many 37mm shells were needed to take out a T-34?
Nevermind, found some info in the MMA section.
Originally posted by Tony Williams
Yes, the B3 did carry a BK 7,5 cannon. For information about WW2 airborne anti-tank cannon and aircraft, see: http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk/tankbusters.htm
[/URL]
Thank you Mr. Williams! Just what I was looking for.:)
Originally posted by Vortex
you should be able to find them in old books about WWII, one place to look for is your local public libraries, the “collector of old and cheap books” 😀 😀 😀 great b/w photos though. I’ve seen at least one where a round hit a ship (near Alaska IIRC)…
What size and class ship? IIRC, the B-25s never really went after warships, mainly transports and the like.
Originally posted by crobato
It’s in IL2 and Forgotten Battles, but if you really want to discuss it, go to the historical section or the IL2 forums themselves.
What kind of rig are you using to run IL-2 crobato? How graphics intensive is it? The screenshots look incredible.