I wonder why, with so many examples built, and used by a large number of different aircraft types, so few Sunbeam engines have survived.
Yes, it came out of the Museum at Oshkosh. Bought, bent, fixed, and for sale again in a short period of time.
The text of the article would suggest that it is a control line model.
It’s strange that two examples of the obscure and hardly used Nubian survive, but none of the infamous Arab……..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SunbeamArab.JPG
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?85521-Surviving-Sunbeam-Aero-Engines
No problem with discussing it…..
……unless, apparently, any comments are made which disagree with the prevailing happy-clappy view that everything is wonderful at Duxford, and all we need are more pictures of fluffy kittens, rainbows and ‘Frankie’. It is, of course, a marvelous idea that the present IWM management is making the hangars much less untidy and cluttered by ugly aeroplanes by turfing out all those nasty Luftwaffe airframes, instead of taking the previous regime’s approach of providing a steady increase in available covered space. Such contrary opinions, of course, fall foul of the established party line and will naturally be immediately censored.
They have also sold, from memory, and there are probably more.. A wildcat, two Hurricanes, four Spitfires, two P47’s, three (four?) Mustangs, Tigercat, B17. They are still here!
Off the top of my head I can think of at least 8 Spitfires – ML417, RK858, TB863, NH799, MV262, NH904, SM832, SM969. As well as 4 or 5 P-47s (did the parts for the IWM static one come directly from TFC, I can never remember?) and at least 3 Hurricanes (including the IWM static one)
And as for rumours and tittle-tattle, isn’t that exactly what the jealously-defended Burma Spitfire thread consists of in its entirety?
It does seem that anything Duxford-related has become a sacred cow on here nowadays, to be reported obsessively in minute detail but with no discussion or, heaven forbid, criticism permitted.
America didn’t need battleships it needed aircraft carriers.
Surely it was the other way around, that the future course of the war in the Pacific was dictated by the fact that the Americans had carriers and no battleships after Pearl Harbor.
An interesting view on TFC from a US-based poster on WIX
http://www.warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=51507&p=514778#p514778
Rotary-powered?
Have you contacted IWM Duxford to ask whether they would permit you to have access to their example?
Ah, that’s okay then. As long as they bubble wrap it, use plenty of tape and remember to affix the correct postage it should be fine. 🙂
G-ORDY, have you considered offering a set of all issues scanned to disc, in the same manner that SVAS do with the ‘Propswing’ archive? There would possibly be a market for it, priced at a tenner or so.
Should they really be transporting something so rare? What if it got damaged? Lots of aeroplanes get damaged in transit you know!
Indeed, albeit a ‘small group of partners’ who are very well-connected in the aviation industry. Nonetheless, a great achievement.