dark light

Mike J

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,951 through 1,965 (of 3,162 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Air Force Historic Flight News #1002040
    Mike J
    Participant

    From a conversation at DX yesterday.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Historic Flight News #1002137
    Mike J
    Participant

    I don’t know how old the article in the link is, but I’ve heard they’ve wrecked the Tiger already. Any truth in this?

    in reply to: FW 190 at Cosford #1002308
    Mike J
    Participant

    Continuation of the decimation of the IWM’s Luftwaffe collection. First the Me163, then the Ju52 and Storch, now the Fw190. 🙁

    in reply to: Reverse Spitfire fund? #1004356
    Mike J
    Participant

    It’s mighty important…………

    Is it? I would suggest that the Society has had little or no real relevance since the events following the farcical AGM held at Duxford last year, which quite a number of us posting here attended. As it continues this steady slide into oblivion, I have wonder who these days really cares any more.

    in reply to: Mew Gull Heading Back To Old Warden #1005456
    Mike J
    Participant

    Whilst readily admitting that I am not an insider at Old Warden, and thus I am not privy to their alleged financial difficulties of a while ago, I do believe that it is rather too simplistic to suggest that:

    …….- ‘if the wind blows or the rain falls’ everything else in its collection is grounded……….

    Having been to 10 out of the main 12 displays at OW this year, I do concede that you are correct on this point. Generally thy manage to fly the Chipmunk too. 🙂

    in reply to: Mew Gull Heading Back To Old Warden #1005517
    Mike J
    Participant

    Oh for a collection that says – sod the ‘war birds’, let’s preserve and fly British light aeroplanes from the first four decades of the twentieth century. Oh, didn’t that used to be the Shuttleworth Collection?

    Yes, the same one which almost went bust, and had to flog off an aeroplane a year to keep its head above water financially.

    Like them or not, the heavy metal 1) brings the paying punters in through the gate in droves, and 2) guarantees that they at least have something to look at in the air if the wind blows or the rain falls.

    in reply to: Mew Gull Heading Back To Old Warden #1006046
    Mike J
    Participant

    Snoopy7422 – Regarding the Wildcat, I think we could probably all think of other aeroplanes we would rather the collection had spent their money on, but I can see some merit in it. It wont be out of place sitting out on the flightline in Royal Navy colours

    I suspect it will be a while before we get to see it, if the glacial progress on the Spitfire project is anything to go by. No disrespect to the engineers there, but if the Spitfire has taken a decade, I don’t see how we can expect the Wildcat to take any less. Not to mention the investment required in American tools and fixings to rebuild it.

    I do rather like the Po-2 though, and after visiting Hahnweide last month I think they should invest in a glider towing hook for it.

    in reply to: Mew Gull Heading Back To Old Warden #1006080
    Mike J
    Participant

    Requium For A Gull.

    If I was providing sponsorship, I’d far rather direct it, for example, towards getting Miss Battens Gull Six back, as this was a genuinely historic and original aircraft.

    I’d suggest that in this instance it is a case of “once it’s gone, it’s gone” and it is unlikely ever to be released into private hands again.

    G-AERD also went to the antipodes relatively recently.

    Nearer three decades ago, I think you’ll find. Again, being part of a National institution (albeit stored since arrival apart from a short-term display), I suspect it too is unlikely to be released.

    That’s why I’m extremely happy that the Mew has ended up where it is, a hopefully more stable Shuttleworth Collection than in the Jean Batten disposal era, rather than at the vagaries of private ownership.

    Now we just need to get them to secure the Miles Hawk Speed Six’s future if it ever comes up for disposal!

    in reply to: Tornado ZA339 #1006232
    Mike J
    Participant

    According to the UK serials website http://www.ukserials.com/ there never was a ZA339 issued, it fell within a gap of unused serials, so it must be a typo. ZA399 seems a more likely candidate.

    in reply to: Any of you chaps know what this means? #1006853
    Mike J
    Participant

    Did you try 0207 370 0409? 🙂

    in reply to: Ulric Cross DFC DSO – RIP #1007340
    Mike J
    Participant
    in reply to: Cosford's "Butcher Bird" #1008156
    Mike J
    Participant

    Nice. I hope they put all the appropriate stencilling back on it at some point though. This was a 1980s repaint, from the days before the same level of rigorous research was applied to paint schemes that is the norm nowadays.

    in reply to: Duxford airshow 1973 – a request #1008387
    Mike J
    Participant

    Any more complaints? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Ulric Cross RIP #1008396
    Mike J
    Participant

    A full and interersting life.

    I’m sure he will feature here http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/london/whats-going-on/news/pilots-of-carribean-appeal/

    in reply to: Duxford airshow 1973 – a request #1008398
    Mike J
    Participant

    Didn’t the other one end up at Flixton?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,951 through 1,965 (of 3,162 total)