From a conversation at DX yesterday.
I don’t know how old the article in the link is, but I’ve heard they’ve wrecked the Tiger already. Any truth in this?
Continuation of the decimation of the IWM’s Luftwaffe collection. First the Me163, then the Ju52 and Storch, now the Fw190. 🙁
It’s mighty important…………
Is it? I would suggest that the Society has had little or no real relevance since the events following the farcical AGM held at Duxford last year, which quite a number of us posting here attended. As it continues this steady slide into oblivion, I have wonder who these days really cares any more.
Whilst readily admitting that I am not an insider at Old Warden, and thus I am not privy to their alleged financial difficulties of a while ago, I do believe that it is rather too simplistic to suggest that:
…….- ‘if the wind blows or the rain falls’ everything else in its collection is grounded……….
Having been to 10 out of the main 12 displays at OW this year, I do concede that you are correct on this point. Generally thy manage to fly the Chipmunk too. 🙂
Oh for a collection that says – sod the ‘war birds’, let’s preserve and fly British light aeroplanes from the first four decades of the twentieth century. Oh, didn’t that used to be the Shuttleworth Collection?
Yes, the same one which almost went bust, and had to flog off an aeroplane a year to keep its head above water financially.
Like them or not, the heavy metal 1) brings the paying punters in through the gate in droves, and 2) guarantees that they at least have something to look at in the air if the wind blows or the rain falls.
Snoopy7422 – Regarding the Wildcat, I think we could probably all think of other aeroplanes we would rather the collection had spent their money on, but I can see some merit in it. It wont be out of place sitting out on the flightline in Royal Navy colours
I suspect it will be a while before we get to see it, if the glacial progress on the Spitfire project is anything to go by. No disrespect to the engineers there, but if the Spitfire has taken a decade, I don’t see how we can expect the Wildcat to take any less. Not to mention the investment required in American tools and fixings to rebuild it.
I do rather like the Po-2 though, and after visiting Hahnweide last month I think they should invest in a glider towing hook for it.
Requium For A Gull.
If I was providing sponsorship, I’d far rather direct it, for example, towards getting Miss Battens Gull Six back, as this was a genuinely historic and original aircraft.
I’d suggest that in this instance it is a case of “once it’s gone, it’s gone” and it is unlikely ever to be released into private hands again.
G-AERD also went to the antipodes relatively recently.
Nearer three decades ago, I think you’ll find. Again, being part of a National institution (albeit stored since arrival apart from a short-term display), I suspect it too is unlikely to be released.
That’s why I’m extremely happy that the Mew has ended up where it is, a hopefully more stable Shuttleworth Collection than in the Jean Batten disposal era, rather than at the vagaries of private ownership.
Now we just need to get them to secure the Miles Hawk Speed Six’s future if it ever comes up for disposal!
According to the UK serials website http://www.ukserials.com/ there never was a ZA339 issued, it fell within a gap of unused serials, so it must be a typo. ZA399 seems a more likely candidate.
Did you try 0207 370 0409? 🙂
Nice. I hope they put all the appropriate stencilling back on it at some point though. This was a 1980s repaint, from the days before the same level of rigorous research was applied to paint schemes that is the norm nowadays.
Any more complaints? :rolleyes:
A full and interersting life.
I’m sure he will feature here http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/london/whats-going-on/news/pilots-of-carribean-appeal/
Didn’t the other one end up at Flixton?