dark light

Jō Asakura

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 1,223 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2338227
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    @ Trident, regarding the legacy HUD, the cockpit upgrade will most likely be integrated first on a developmental prototype like this company Su-30MKI belonging to Irkut, as happened with Thales MFDs a decade ago:

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Russia—Air/Sukhoi-Su-30MKI/0906758/L/&sid=070c97ff89a25c49e9544e54d322f681

    SM3 cockpit is similar to SM2, with slightly larger push button LCDs.

    in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2338295
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    That is pretty radical for an upgrade don’t you think? Completely yanking out original cockpit displays and installing a new all glass board.

    The ‘Super-30’ is a radical upgrade. I think those displays are Russian and not any existing Samtel-Thales, so I would expect similar cockpits to begin appearing on the Su-35S, 30SM etc.

    http://zno.zinio.com/reader.jsp?issue=416192016&o=int&prev=sub&p=71

    Note: the bit on the Phazotron Zhuk-AE is wrong, the AESA will undoubtedly be from Tikhomirov-NIIP (imho).

    in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2338480
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Hmm, my guess – latest Super 30 MKI layout, the HUD might change in time.

    Yep, I think this is an Irkut company Su-30MKI cockpit installation tester for the ‘Super 30’ upgrade, with large touch screen LCDs (you can see the function icons in horizontal rows).
    Remember, IN MiG-29K cockpits are also black.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2346879
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    S-37 pictured in 2008, with w/bay doors open:

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to71000/070452.jpg

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2348833
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Surprise everybody!!! [applause]

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to71000/070004.jpg

    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    The AL-31F-M2’s max thrust rating is 14,100kgf and is unlikely to be ordered by the RuAF or any foreign Flanker operator, for that matter. Most likely they’ll wait for AL-31F-M3 which builds on F-M2’s modifications by including a new 3-stage low pressure compressor and will likely compete directly with NPO Saturn’s 117S for Flanker upgrades.

    From top to bottom AL-31-FM1 (13,300kgf); AL-31-FM2 (14,100kgf); AL-31-FM3 (14,600kgf). Also diagram of F-M3’s new LP compressor:

    http://sonbi.ru/salut-science/Avia/AL-31F/Al-31FM1-3.htm

    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    This Hind is from Sierra Leone, not Nigeria.

    The British Army’s IMATT (SL) base is located next to Nairobi’s International Airport. Why wouldn’t he fly out of there, instead of getting the VIP treatment with a ‘Hind’…..to a ship?

    in reply to: MMRCA news XI #2350422
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    We’ll know for sure in summer, but I’d say it was highly likely (also for AdA Rafales). It appears to be part of the offsets & ToT:

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showpost.php?p=1865794&postcount=397

    in reply to: MMRCA news XI #2350461
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Mysura Reddy’s letter to AK Anthony questioning Rafale’s L1 selection process is just political hokum endemic in the malaise that currently bedraggles India’s coalition government. The 30 day ‘enquiry’ will just be protocol and will not result in any jaw dropping revelations (as neither technical evaluation data nor L1 calculations will be made available for public release), besides, Reddy’s comments on Rafale in Libya and reporting in the notoriously sensationalist tabloid that is the ‘Deccan Chronicle’ – hardly lend weight to the charge.

    As Common Sense has already stated, a probe would mean the immediate suspension of contractual negotiations- which has not happened. Note, it could be EADS’ mischief making (their last throw of the dice) as it seems the door is firmly closed to a counter-bid.

    More on offsets:

    http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/features/rafale-revolutionindian-airspace_674647.html

    Vnomad,how exactly will EF’s MLU prove cheaper when even partner nations decline to commit to it? Winning MMRCA was crucial for Rafale’s MLU…but was absolutely critical for EF’s.

    I’d like to know Ajai Shukla’s views on the signing of that Indo-French de-facto M-88X joint development and manufacture, due in summer. An engine which will be destined for not only IAF Rafales but also AMCA (i.e. a major headache for the Indians- solved).

    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Could be a Nigerian AF ‘Hind’ medevac’ing a British Special Boat Squadron soldier after the failed hostage rescue attempt on March 8th.

    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    If this sale goes through (and I highly doubt it), it is not only IPR guarantees the Russkies will seek, but also basing locations. The RuAF itself wouldn’t want to go head-to-head with Su-35S anytime in the future, they may even stipulate certain distances from the Indian border too (no deployments in the ‘Tibetan Autonomous Region’).

    Who knows, as alluded to by USS, maybe it’s all just geo-political & commercial posturing by RosoboronExport. It is the Indian Defence market that is and will be the World’s most lucrative for years to come- maybe it’s just a way of signalling to India ‘we could have sold them- but we didn’t ’cause you’re our best friends and don’t you forget it’.

    Note the usually hysterical Indian press has been remarkably cool about these rumours and also the ‘Super 30’ upgrade has been stated as a “deep upgrade” by Pogosyan himself with capabilities similar to, or exceeding those of, the Su-35S. Russo-Indian weapons program co-operation far exceeds anything a one-off sale to the PRC would encapsulate. Remember, KnAAPO is way behind their rival Irkut in commercially successful military sales, they know a Chinese order would be lucrative (reportedly $85m apiece), and drive down unit cost for a potential follow-on RuAF order. The Su-35S is in danger of becoming the ‘Russian Rafale’ (pre-Indian order of course!:D).

    Besides New Delhi would be far more concerned about S-400 sales.

    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    I don’t mean to rain on your parade, but as already stated by Mack08, today the Chinese MoD denied any approach/ rfi etc. for a possible Su-35S purchase (J-20B Snoopdog was right after all).

    As for the high cost of the latest Su-30MKIs- these will be ‘Super 30’ standard, and the headline price of the initial 40 will fall once the cost of the upgrade is spread over the entire MKI fleet (~270).

    in reply to: MMRCA – has Rafale been illegally subsidised? #2294947
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Wg Cdr. Jackonicko impounds 2 Rafales for alleged illegal ‘dumping’ (whilst categorically denying any link between ‘aid’ and cricket):

    http://www.defense.gouv.fr/var/dicod/storage/images/base-de-medias/images/air/actualites/images-2012/images-mars-2012/formation-mixte-composee-de-deux-rafale-francais-premier-plan-et-de-deux-typhoon-britanniques/1580761-1-fre-FR/formation-mixte-composee-de-deux-rafale-francais-premier-plan-et-de-deux-typhoon-britanniques.jpg
    http://www.defense.gouv.fr/var/dicod/storage/images/base-de-medias/images/air/actualites/images-2012/images-mars-2012/formation-mixte-typhoon-rafale/1580766-1-fre-FR/formation-mixte-typhoon-rafale.jpg

    in reply to: Quadbike Indian Air Force Thread Part 18 #2295135
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Updates on Kaveri.
    http://i40.tinypic.com/qrf1js.jpg

    So the revised engine will be rated at 91.6 KN ?

    That sounds like Snecma’s M-88X (as it has an almost identical thrust rating).

    The program M88-X (9 tons) is a project led by Snecma in connection with the sale of Rafale for United Arab Emirates. This variant will develop 20.250 lbf (from 17,000 lbf (76 kN) currently) justified by the fact that they will operate in a hot weather countries and will be for interception operations. This program could be accelerated by the interest of Kuwait and Libya for a Rafale equipped with this engine. It could also equip the French army in Tranche 4 Rafales ordered the engine to present the same costs of maintenance in operational conditions than previous versions (including “Pack CGP” and “-E4) . The main change in this version is a low pressure compressor larger to increase the flow of engine 65 kg / s to 72 kg / s, with an overall pressure ratio of 27. The three floors of this module will be vaned disc monobloc.

    in reply to: Indian Su-30 – not completely reliable? #2295143
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    I think the Russian angle is that Irkut considers the ‘warranty’ null and void if the Indians continue to park their aircraft outdoors in weather conditions ranging from blistering heat to monsoon to sub-zero over a matter of a few months.

    If the Algerians can build brand-new HASs (on a brand new base @ Ain Beida) for their Su-30MKAs- I’m sure the Indians can do much better!

    http://defense-update.com/photos/algerian_su30_ain_beida.html

    It would beggar belief to see upcoming Super-30s, Rafales and FGFAs parked outside for extended periods.

    The FBW glitch is strange…as it only appears to have effected the MkIII models.

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 1,223 total)