dark light

Cees Broere

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 1,395 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Avro Manchester – Any in existance? #1300217
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    I quote from Avro Manchester, the legend behind the Lancaster by Robert Kirby:

    Following it’s withdrawal from active service, L7420 was used by both the RAF and USAAF for dinghy and ditching training. On 13th june 1956 it was salvaged from a flooded gravel pit of the Lincolnshire Sand & Gravel Co on the Burton Estate by aircrews from USAF Sturgate. It is assumed to be scrapped following recovery.

    Unquote

    This text was accompanied by two photo’s showing the fuselage and centresection on the back of American salvage vehicles. Wonder what happened to it.

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Hurricane in a garage? #1301087
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    The ex- Steve Milnthorpe’s project?

    Cheers
    Cees

    in reply to: Avro Manchester – Any in existance? #1302263
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    According to the various posts above the answer unfortunately is no.
    We have dug a Manchester but this were only crashremains and bits of the engines. A ditched Manchester would be the only way, or converting a Lancaster back to Machester specs but that would be blasphemy according to some fans:D Only problem would be the Vulture engines
    I wouldn’t mind though
    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: he111 zwilling #1302312
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    Last year EHVB and I visited Gatow and saw the mainspar from up close. It looks more like part of a bridge. The brackets still had remains of wooden ribs clamped into them. All that’s needed is a welded steel fuselage and a Gigant is a distinct possibilty. IIRC there is another main spar about in Germany.

    Amazing what’s still left but easily overlooked, even items such as this.

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: hercules engined lancs/merlin engined halifaxes #1302911
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    why where these two variants so unsuccesful in their operational use
    the hercules lanc couldnt reach a decent service ceiling, whilst the merlin engined halifaxes couldnt be “tropicalised “for the far east theatre, why the problems with these two variants?:cool: 😎 😎

    Don’t agree,

    The Merlin engined Halifaxes were used flying over the “Hump”
    Halifaxes weren’t as sensitive to tropical climates as the Lancaster was. Halifaxes flew many missions in the desert even strafing ground targets.
    Cees

    in reply to: Avro Manchester – Any in existance? #1304226
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    The fifties was only a short periode after the war, people had other things to do than preserving aircraft. Although at that same periode the prototype Mosquito was being saved after De Havilland ordered it to be burnt. Must be a matter of perspective.
    It’s still happening
    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Help Tracking Manufacturers… #1304238
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    Hi Dave,

    how about some pics of your Typhoon bits collection?
    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1304241
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    🙂 😀 Why? Do you need one then?:p

    The guard made from tubing is fitted temorarily but needs to be trimmed
    and fitted in a more horizontal position. At this angle you wouldn’t even be able to get into the pilot’s seat.:D

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Avro Manchester – Any in existance? #1304249
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    According to the book Manchester Story the remains of the last Manchester were recovered from a flooded pit and scrapped by an American unit in the mid fifties. The book also has photographs of the recovery. Could be the same? But not having survived until the seventies obviously.

    Cees

    in reply to: Armstron Whithworth Siskin #1305053
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    Thanks for the interesting replies chaps. Amazing what’s still around albeit scattered all over the country or countries. Didn’t know about any Siskin drawings in Holland but they were never used or built here, so that would be strange if true. The Siskin is a very important type between the wars of UK aviation history, so if a Bulldog can be recreated the Siskin should be relatively easy to do apart from funding. But that’s the trouble with (in this case) british aviation. There are so many types that it is difficult to make a list with priorities. And that would also be depending on personal taste. It’s not easy to be in charge of this kind of work as the RAF Museum is doing but full marks to them for doing it.

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Heston Type 5 Racer… #1305058
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    There was a plan a long time ago to ressurect it, but that came to nough.
    Cees

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1305076
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    The console for the undercarriage, flaps and bombdoor levers is now finished.
    The trapezium hole is for the flaps and bombdoors (could be a real pain in an emergency) and the round hole on the port side is for the undercarriage lever.

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Aircraft part(P38?) #1306590
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    Looking at that pic Cees,I’d say you’re right on the money.

    Have yourself a big cigar;) 😉 😉

    Miggers:D

    Sorry, don’t smoke or do you mean the Clinton way?:)
    The nose section on show at Texel is owned by our chairman, and was
    restored by Fokker shortly before they went belly up (nothing to do with that I hope) but there are more sections around. It’s a nice looking aircraft would be nice to see it reconstructed one day.
    Cees

    in reply to: aircraft undercarrige design #1306597
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    And what about the manual retraction device where you had to do 740 revolutions by hand and then do it again to retract the other wheel. Not something to do when you are in an emergency situation.

    On the Halifax the Messier undercarriage was bulky and slow to retract which created a log of drag. The Hastings used a similar set up but the casting was much slimmer (experience?)
    Cees

    in reply to: Aircraft part(P38?) #1306600
    Cees Broere
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 1,395 total)