When I visited the TU at Delft some ten years ago there were a lot of WWII vintage aircraft bits all over the place. A complete Spitfire Mainspar was also present and as PL344 also originated from there wouldn’t be surprised it that was one of her mainspars.
Cheers
Cees
Will that be when the Eurostar stops off at St Pancras as well? If so it’ll be very easy to get to Colindale (the nearest tube), just get on the Northern Line for Edgeware and it only takes about half an hour from there. If anyone else reckons they’ll get lost easily and coming via tube i’ll be happy to meet them outside the tube station.
Also, thanks to TexanTomcat yesterday, I now know the way to the Hannants model shop (well, more of a warehouse it’s so big) which is about 200 metres from the RAF Museum which i’ll show the way to for anyone interested, I know where my student loan is going to end up being spent!
Where abouts would people want to go that might be closed off? Yesterday the upstairs B of B and Sunderland gallery was closed off again and looks like it will be for a long time, can’t guarantee anything but I could try and see if I could get us into that area
Yes, I will be in London from november 10t till 13th with spouse and friends, so no aviation time (not even a visit to IWM Lambeth, but I keep hoping), but when AHVB get’s back from holiday I will ask him if he is interested as well.
Cheers
Cees
Indeed, the need for shorter take off and landing runs was identified while testing a half scale prototype, leading to the longer undercarriage.
The first prototype L7600 was lost on an early test flight when a seized brake caused the undercarriage to collapse – fortunately with no injuries but, a few of years ago when I spoke the daughter of the test pilot, Lankester-Parker, she still had clear memories of being led away from the airfield hysterical at watching her father’s crash.
The undercarriage was made simpler and stronger for the second prototype.
Allan
But not strong enough, there are even photographs showing a row of Stirlings and one of them on it’s belly. But a very nice aircraft type, about time one found intact somewhere;)
Cheers
Cees
Possibly Fokker S13? Only one prototype built as a bomber trainer but due to the Marhall plan not put into production. The nose section is on show at Texel and sections of wing, nacelle and tail are IIRC at Soesterberg.
Just a hunch
Cees
Really effective camouflage:D
Seriously, very nice rendering of the old workhorse Whitley
About time a book is published about the old girl (before you
comment on that, NO, not me I have other talents, but writing
isn’t one of them);)
:p 😉 😀
Cheers
Cees
Glad you did Elliott.
Cheers
Cees
Parts of this aircraft among which were elevator(s) etc. are used on Tony Agars Mosquito restoration.
The site also shows some very substantial Audax bits, would make a nice addition to Guy Blacks Hawker bi-plane stable. The Whitley remains are still there?, if not it would cost Elliott a few days off I think.:p
Cheers
Cees
I’ll be going to London by Eurostar next month, if it turns out to be a smooth ride I can plan more visits to good old London. I am very interested in meeting you all there.
Cheers
Cee
Hawker Restorations hinted at doing such a conversion IIRC
Cees
Wasn’t the Shoreham Spitfire XVI TB… recovered from the kenley dump during the eighties?
Cees
In Germany there are some DB610’s on display. Oh, and in France is one as well IIRC.
Cheers
Cees
The Halton had square windows in the fuselage, the C MK VIII had the round portholes along the fuselage, Call it what you want, I like it:D
Cheers
Cees
There are many sides to a story but as David pointed out these sites can yield parts or information for restoration projects, The Halifax and Albacore are mentioned but the FAA Museums Barracuda also comprises mainly crashed sections. Elliott would have to look ever harder for Whitely bits if there weren’t any high ground wrecks. But as mentioned earlier, several decades ago there were substantial wrecks that could provide a very good start for a restoration.
Cees
Ahh that is why the Germans lost the war, everything was way over-engineered, built to last… While the British stuff was built to ‘just to do the job’ and nothing more…..
The Russians did that even a little bit better. The British always seemed to “muddle” through I read somewhere. One of the results was the Beaufighter for instance.
Cees
No problem, feel free to ask.
We think that these crashsites are being investigated out of historical viewpoint as well as solving some mysteries and provide a chance for next of kin to close an emotional chapter in life. We do not wish to make money out of selling bits. But that’s just our own way of doing it.
We have a huge building where our museum is based and a relatively large storage area and we have in recent years been sifting though the recovered wreckage and anything that is not useful will be send for scrap (mostly scraps of aluminium) with the money put back into our museum.
Cees