We still fly NDB approaches ?? 🙂 I haven’t flown an NDB approach since my Instrument training. GPS approaches should be included though.
I usually turn on the PCL if the cloudbase and Vis are not great , even if it is still VFR. Here in Ohio the summer haze can make spotting the runway a little challenging at times. Turning on the lights can act as an attention getter.. your eyes are attracted to a sudden change (caused by the lights coming on) and you instantly can locate the airport. King Air equipment can range from basic to very advanced. All that I have flown are equipped with a minimum of 2 coms radios, 2 Nav radios, transponder, radar, autopilot,flight director and GPS. The King Air’s I am fortunate enough to fly also have Weather uplink (very nice to have), TCAD for traffic awareness and TAWS (also nice to have when shooting an IFR approach in the Appalachian mountain range, which we do often).
I used to play A10 Cuba a lot. Lots of fun. I just wish there had been more missions. I had to wait for Lock On: Modern Air Combat before I could fly the Hog again.
Here are a couple more. I have just started using an new camera and these are the initial results.
NGC2903 again. The new camera does a much nicer job IMHO giving a cleaner image with less noise.
The Horsehead Nebula again. Unfortunately, Orion was getting pretty washed out with light pollution near the horizon when I took this. That is why the contrast is not as good as it could have been. Even so, I think it is a better image than my last attempt (except for the contrast).
The new camera is monochrome, so to get colour images, I have to take four sets of data using filters for Red, Green, Blue and Luminance. The Luminance set contains the majority of the detail and takes longer to capture. I then use Photoshop to merge the colour data to give the final image. More time consuming than a one shot colour camera, but the sensor is more than twice as sensitive when compared to the previous camera and the lack of a bayer matrix on the chip means that each image is much sharper. The image of NGC2903 is the first I have done where the data was gathered on two separate nights. I took the Luminance and Blue data on Friday night and finished up the Red and Green data on Saturday. For some reason, I find that pretty amazing. Hopefully the new camera (a Meade Deep Sky Imager Pro) will allow me to get some really nice images over the next few months.
Here are a couple more. I have just started using an new camera and these are the initial results.
NGC2903 again. The new camera does a much nicer job IMHO giving a cleaner image with less noise.
The Horsehead Nebula again. Unfortunately, Orion was getting pretty washed out with light pollution near the horizon when I took this. That is why the contrast is not as good as it could have been. Even so, I think it is a better image than my last attempt (except for the contrast).
The new camera is monochrome, so to get colour images, I have to take four sets of data using filters for Red, Green, Blue and Luminance. The Luminance set contains the majority of the detail and takes longer to capture. I then use Photoshop to merge the colour data to give the final image. More time consuming than a one shot colour camera, but the sensor is more than twice as sensitive when compared to the previous camera and the lack of a bayer matrix on the chip means that each image is much sharper. The image of NGC2903 is the first I have done where the data was gathered on two separate nights. I took the Luminance and Blue data on Friday night and finished up the Red and Green data on Saturday. For some reason, I find that pretty amazing. Hopefully the new camera (a Meade Deep Sky Imager Pro) will allow me to get some really nice images over the next few months.
Glad you like them! Holty, yes, I have seen that site. Amazing images!
Glad you like them! Holty, yes, I have seen that site. Amazing images!
I have fancied trying a round the world trip on FS2004, but I know I most likely not going to finish it. As Moggy says above, long flights get tedious (even in real life).
I may give it a go someday though. I also prefer combat flight sims, with IL2 Forgotten Battles and it’s addons coming in as my current favourite.
My personal favourite FS2004 aircraft is the Aeroworx King Air 200. It is payware but I can vouch for the fact that it is very realistic.
I was flying some Falcon 4 Allied Force yesterday. I have been playing an ongoing campaign based on the Bosnia conflict. For this mission I was flying with a Danish Squadron from an airfield in Italy. The Mission was to hit a Bosnian airbase. My flight made it’s attack runs using Durandal anti runway bombs. After the attack I decided to go and take a look at our handywork (not the smartest tactical move, but fun all the same).





Falcon 4 Allied Force is the latest commercial release of the venerable Falcon 4. It builds on the work of some of the leading ‘modders’ but mainly focuses on being stable straight out the box (which it seems to do nicely). The Balkans campaign is also included. I had the original Falcon 4 but soon tired of trying to keep up with the latest tweaks and mods. I picked up Allied Force recently to give it another go. All I can say is it is an amazing Sim even though it is a rehashed version of an 8 year old program. It runs very smoothly, with no glitches so far. It is quite an experience once you invest the time to learn all the avionics and weapons systems etc etc..
Seems kind of strange Kev. I have Forgotten Battles and never had a problem running it in 1024×768.
In the Forgotten Battles folder in the program menu Start>Programs>UBISOFT>Forgotten Battles you will find a Setup utility where you can specify the resolution. Try that. Good Luck.
Hi P1lts. There are a number of factors that will help you decide. Microlighting will most likely cost more. It used to be that you could not rent a microlight, so for lessons you had to have your own (or a share in one). That may well be out of date information now though (my brother Neil was working on his Microlight licence in the mid 90’s and went halves on a Weight Shift with my Step-father). He loved it but unfortunately the running costs and weather turned against him and the Navy sent him off to sea just before he could take his GFT.
As mentioned, gliding required a club, mainly because it takes more than one person to get the glider airborne.. then there is the need to push the aircraft into position and recover it after landing.. of course, there are motor-gliders which are a lot of fun.
At the end of the day, you should go with the path that excites you the most (within the funding limits you set).
Learning to fly was one of the best things I ever did. The type of aircraft you fly is not important really. The important thing is just getting up there. It will change you and you will never be the same again. Go for it. I know you will not regret it.
Well, at least Hollywood has not got the rights.. we would be looking at a movie where the aircraft are B17’s, Gibson was from New York (probably played by Tom Cuise) and the bomb was tested on Lake Erie. Worked for U571 afterall :rolleyes: :dev2:
OK, a few more then :). These may be a little mixed up.
This is the town where I live. Zanesville Ohio. Note the ‘Y’ Bridge which is evidently very unusual.
I have been lucky enough to fly right seat in the company Cessna Ciation II on a few occasions. Cockpit while flying in the upper 30’s.
A phenomena called a ‘Glory’ taken while flying back from San Antonio Texas last year.
Those clouds are a long way down!
Pittsburg Intl. We were descending back towards Zanesville. It takes me 2 1/2 hours to drive there when my family visits. We were on the ground 15 minutes later!
The closest I am likey to get to being in Orbit 🙂
Citation Cockpit with GPS showing us over Lake Erie after just departing from Cleveland Burke Lakefront.
Some ugly mug who let him in here?).
King Air N127DC which we fly for charter.
Finally, the cockpit of King Air 200 N127MJ. My favourite King Air to fly.
Have a great 2006 everyone!