dark light

Romantic Techno

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 144 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: In Eynac's back #834930
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    Bumped up for a bit more attention. Please note:

    – the cantilever low wing airframe

    – the uncowled inline engine

    – obviously it wears a race number (E6) suggesting it took part in some kind of competition.

    Thanks again for answers!

    Regards, RT

    in reply to: Sleek biplane to be named #834934
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    Thank you Antoni for all these exhaustive informations!

    Regards, RT

    in reply to: Sleek biplane to be named #835375
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    OK Antoni, I admit you might be right. But you see there are major differences between your pics 1 and 2 of the Ptapta. All these details are confusing me. At least, I mean to see an angular vertical tailfin in my picture. Going to change my picture label. Thank you!

    Regards, RT

    in reply to: Sleek biplane to be named #836386
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    Thank you, Antoni! But…

    …googling for the DUS-III Ptapta delivers something different. It has a predecessor for being built using a duraluminium frame, the Skraba ST-3.

    See https://translate.google.as/translate?hl=en&sl=pl&u=http://www.samolotypolskie.pl/samoloty/1640/126/DUS-III-Ptapta&prev=search for the Ptapta and click the link to the ST-3, then compare the pictures. The Ptapta shows a string parallel to the strut, the Skraba doesn’t. The latter’s picture fits perfectly to my one above!

    The aircraft is the Skraba ST-3, really a rarity, and also no good pictures of it to be googled out. Thanks again!

    Regards, RT

    in reply to: Little Unknown Farman #921727
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    Thank you Martin. F 355, 390 and 400 are pictured in aviafrance.com. They show different configurations. What remains is the F 360. About this there is an entry in airwar.ru, but it is shown with four-bladed prop and normal-looking, spatted undercarriage. And the registration is *false*:angel:

    I am going to store the picture as F 360.

    Regards, RT

    in reply to: Louis de Funès "pilots" what? #904858
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    You are right, thank you. I thought the tailfin were much smaller but one of Laurence’s pictures show clearly it is a MS 880. Of course I have one in my collection. But I also got confused by the black knobs on the cowling (in my picture, one is covered by a propeller blade). No other aicraft picture of this type shows this feature, at least I found none.

    Regards, RT

    in reply to: What Does This Man Call? #849515
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    Thank you for all your witty (and more) comments. Further I received the following from warbirdsforum.com:

    “From the look of him I’d guess “yes please, milk and two sugars””

    “I’ll be there as soon as I teach this ****** how to taxi this thing.”

    “I don’t think I wanna’ get IN this thing … without beer.”

    “I say, I think I’ve assembled our new ride-on mower incorrectly.”

    “Where’s the clutch”……..

    Hope you enjoyed once more, and regards, RT

    in reply to: Hanriot HD 41H Type 1? #917928
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    Thank you for your answers, friends! So I am going to store the thing as Hanriot HD 17 E2.

    Best regards, RT

    in reply to: United States Postal Service Gyrocopter #382463
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    Thank you for your answers. I am going to store the thing as “Hughes Gyrocopter” and hope good old Howard will not mind (watching from his cloud).

    Regards, RT

    in reply to: Unknown Early-1930s Style Racer #858231
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    To be found in aerofiles.com as “PSE Racer”. Thank you Mike!

    Regards, RT

    in reply to: Unknown Early-1930s Style Racer #858398
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    Bumped up for a bit more attention. Difficult ?!?:confused:

    Regards, RT

    in reply to: Stranger Iin The Grapevine #859509
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    Thank you friends, especially Mothminor for finding it. Sorry for answering late, I have only limited time to share here and was already hopeless. Yes, it is the second one of “unidentified 1929 aircraft” in the link you gave. Due to aerofiles.com, I think it is correct to store it as Inland S-300 Sport.

    Thanks again, and best regards,
    RT

    in reply to: Stranger Iin The Grapevine #870585
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    Thank you for your answers, but sorry to say, we didn’t get any further. According to aerofiles.com, ‘N92W’ is a “Miller glider”, ‘N92E’ is a Command-Aire 3C3 (which is a biplane), other combinations also show no matching result. Another one to be put into my “Unidentified” folder. Some happen to leave it after years…

    Wine or cotton, I think the location is somewhere in California.

    …, back flying within a couple of months.

    You mean it’s now always flying on the back? For months? Sorry, just couldn’t resist.;)

    Regards, RT

    in reply to: Postwar Trainer for You to Name #924521
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    Thank you Tim!

    Regards, RT

    in reply to: Post-WWII Sports Plane – Please Help to Identify #931554
    Romantic Techno
    Participant

    http://www.eaa.org/chapters/resources/articles/120904_briefing.asp

    Joan Trefethen Alford was quite a lady, the first woman to fly at the Reno Air Races. Her plane (not in the races) was N75T.

    I am sure nobody intended to seriously question Joan Trefethen’s reputation. It’s only the hair-raising and unexpected coincidence of certain ingredients which causes this kind of delight. After all, we are only human. I ask for understanding.:angel:

    Regards, RT

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 144 total)