I experience a lot of things when doing requests for aircraft identification, but this one is unique! (LOL, sometime unable to stop:highly_amused:).
Thank you for your answers, especially to Mothminor for the PDF!
I think it is apposite to store the picture as S**** Playgirl!:eagerness:
Best regards, RT
I have to correct myself, the plane is mentioned in the Vance section of aerofiles.com, as first entry, although without a picture. Not mentioned is the later change to a (so far) unknown inline engine.
You may like to read from the link contributor *Doc* on theaerodrome.com gave: http://www.dmairfield.com/people/vance_ck/index.html
Regards, RT
Yes, this is it. I forgot that Fokker also produced in the USA. Thank you!
Regards, RT
Thank you for your comments, friends. I should add that in German language “Koycher” sounds like “keuchen” = “to gasp”.
BTW, Koycher’s further fate is unknown. His invention could have been war-crucial. Rumours say his efforts were at last too successfull and he became tossed in to outer space, not leaving the slightest trace.
Hope you enjoyed, and regards, RT
Thank you Lynx! Obviously, there is no picture of the completed aircraft available.
Regards, RT
Rear side turret: Martin PBM Mariner. Forward side turret: Potez-CAMS 141. Forward (inline) engines: Short S.19 Singapore III. (Rear (radial) engines could be a variety of tandem engined flying boats). Tailfin configuration: Boeing 314.
(It looks good! It looks fine! (Melody: Manfred Mann’s “Doh Wah Diddy”:)) Going to be stored in my art images collection).
Regards, RT
Was identified by contributor *Cripy* at aereimilitari.org as Ca.331B with 20 mm cannons.
Regards, RT
Confirmed! Thank you Tim!
Regards, RT
You might be right, Pogno. I shall ask on aereimilitari.org.
Regards, RT
Thank you Consul for finding it! Also thanks to Mothminor, I think you are right about the CANT 1010.
Quoting Moze in Wieesso’s link (once more thanks for that): “On page 132 of Thompson’s Italian Civil and Military Aircraft book if you happen to have a copy-no pic though, just a short description”. I was already sorry not yet having bought the “Thompson”. But without a picture, I would not have found it either!:eek:
Regards, RT
Hi Pogno,
well, there is a similarity, but I said already it is not the same. Maybe this is just “family lookalike”, it also could be an unknown variant.
Regards, RT
Although it is not possible to google out a good picture of this aircraft, the ones that can be found show you must be right. Thank you Mothminor!
Regards, RT
Thank you Mr Aeroclub!:eagerness:
Regards, RT
#32 was found as Fasig-Turner biplane by Mr. Tork1945 on theaerodrome.com: http://www.theaerodrome.com/forum/aircraft/60232-please-name-32-a.html
Regards, RT
I see. Thanks for the supplements.
Regards, RT