dark light

Nick_76

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,921 through 1,935 (of 2,296 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hezbollah Sagger killing most IDF on ground #1810254
    Nick_76
    Participant

    One tank per day is pretty high considering the scale of the engagement and the vaunted heavy armor of Merkava tanks and related vehicles- especially when your opponent are lightly equipped guerillas.

    You are kidding right Vympel?
    Not all those tanks were total losses too..
    I’d say the Merks have held up pretty well…they have been hammered with RPGs to Metis-Ms and only 30 odd knocked out of action!

    in reply to: RUSSIAN AESA #2588593
    Nick_76
    Participant

    What is interesting is operational functionality using quality proven products available today. France, Sweden, UK have all flown AESA demonstrators but just because it’s “AESA” doesn’t make it any better than the current mature operational system. Russia has a small fleet too so I suppose they to wish to wait for their AESA products to mature.

    Debatable. UK & France are both rushing forward for AESA, at least EADS+ Selex is in the former case, whereas in the latter Dassault needs AESA to make the Rafale more enticing for export.

    The JAS 39’s PS05 Mk3 is already the strongest operational multifunction radar in Europe today at 160km bvr capability + a decent SAR, and while a AESA is possible to install the aim is to enhance the current one in ground modes with high resolution SAR and autonomy, and further advance the AESA technology during this time.

    A source for the PS05 range would be great. And secondly, in air to air- the EF is better. As a strong multifunction radar, the RDY Mk2 is also fairly capable, dont you think?

    Err… ever heard of a little company called Ericsson ? They are currently focused on reducing the size of the modules but still increase effect. So far they have demonstrated an array with 15,000 TR modules. Nothing says that one will go into a fighter jet radar but fact is they are developing the components for the multi-channel AESA to the Swedish NORA III Programme.

    You don’t do breakthroughs with baby-steps…

    Ericsson is dependent on Raytheon modules..

    in reply to: RUSSIAN AESA #2588596
    Nick_76
    Participant

    What makes the Epaulet impressive? Is it in terms of performance or is it that its purely Russian (which is doubtful, since NIIP may use COTS processors for signal/ data processing, like the rest of the world does).

    in reply to: Pakistan Navy #2044694
    Nick_76
    Participant

    I a, not saying who is right and who is wrong. Thats your own value jusgement. I just pointed out a simple fact. Pakistan is sandwiched between two neighbours who spend much more (as a gross total) on defence thne Pakistan does. With regards to spending more on social development, I agree, in an ideal world Pakistan would spend all its money on social/education/helath prgrammes. However, as your aware, we dont live in an ideal world.

    No, you made a comment which was partly hyperbole- about the superiority of the PN’s sub arm- based on a false premise.

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Sindhugosh.html
    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Shishumar.html

    As can be seen the upgraded Indian submarines are fairly modern & in terms of numbers and capability provide more effect than the PNs current arm.
    As regards defence spending, you made the statement that Pak spends less than its neighbours- true, but only partly true given that as a percentage of GDP, Pak spends more than it should. If India were to replicate the Pak defence spending, it could easily swamp Pak in terms of acquisitions, but its procurement & defence expenditure is more balanced.

    in reply to: Pakistan Navy #2044702
    Nick_76
    Participant

    So, you are saying IAF would have no clue of what goes on in IN? btw, his post was in response to the MPA competition that includes IL-38 and P-8.

    IAF is least bothered about IN MPA’s. They know about the capabilities, but it would be extremely rare if not downright impossible to have IAF pilots visit Australia and crib about IN equipment. IOW, this sounds like an apocryphal “sea story”. As regards French equipment etc- ditto, the IN was interested in Israeli + Indian fits, not French.

    btw, Harry. I really do think you should do something about Qantaz. He has been very confrontative in this thread.

    Same could be said of PAF-F16 B.

    in reply to: Pakistan Navy #2044725
    Nick_76
    Participant

    No man I am sure that i aint mistaken. On the show ‘Greates Ever’ it was shown on Discovery and they were counting down bombers. when the bear was up on #8 tom clancy said these words…..

    ‘The bear is gradually the world noisiest plane, so loud infact that its signatures can be picked up by submarines’ …..Tom Clancy

    Qantaz u can keep barking, the mods will just ban a pesky annoying little kid like you. If ya wanna be stupid go ahead. Hope u learned something from Harry’s post.

    Wow. Quoting Tom Clancy on Russian military equipment is quite akin to quoting Hezbollah on Israeli valour. IOW, Tom Clancy’s cold war idealogical blinkers & rah rah attitude to US vs Russian make him extremely suspect, and hes not regarded as a serious commentator by current serving US military personnel. That apart, Clancy is an ex-insurance salesman, not an engineer or soldier.

    Irrespective of the noise – and I would like to see how many submerged Pakistani subs field deployable *surface acoustic detection equipment*, which they can deploy even if submerged – to detect “noisy” Bears, the Bears have two things in their favour- internal volume & payload, and endurance. Which make them suitable for long endurance missions.

    Also, the IN Tu-142’s have gone through limited upgrades per sources- these include the latest locally produced ESM gear & Israeli Elta 2022 radars. Of course, the IN is discreet about the sonar gear. But as a point of interest, please look at the ALH project & the IN’s sonar project for the same. So India does have the ability to field local sonar gear for the Tu-142’s and with less fuss..

    in reply to: Pakistan Navy #2044728
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Well, in that case the IL-38 has to stay close to its bounderies aswell BECAUSE it can easily be shot down by a F-16 (dont bitch, this is exactly what your saying except with MKI and P-3) May I remind you no country is stupid enough to send a MPA to another countries’ coasts without an escort. I think you forgot that the PN P-3’s also have F-16’s/J-10’s/JF-17 to escort them through.

    Pakistan Navy & the Atlatique anyone?
    Seriously, the lack of joint service ethos in Pak will bedevil any future ops. Best for the PN if it gets its own fighters and need not rely on the AF.

    India doen not have a SAM that can reach that far….Pakistan would not deploy a P-3c in a F*K*N* airspace with fighters….India does not own seas/oceans 200-300 KM off shore( so therefore it is not known as India’s airspace) meaning that the fighters cannot shoot it down UNLESS the wreckage drops in Indian waters/land….Only in War time is this possible and i am talking about current time….which is peacetime. A F-16 is indeed capable of escorting a P-3 NEAR Indian territory, thus letting the P-3 shoot its 100+KM Harpoon’s and then the formations would RTB -Return To Base-. If the Su-30 is told to intrecept/chase down the F-16 WILL shoot beacuse it is not in Indian Airspace but over the ocean. Yes, with the limits listed by Uncle Sam we will have to play our F-16 game more strategically.

    India will seek to pre-emptively strike Paks P3’s if its fleet goes into harms way. As simple as that.

    Let me remind you that every country has a budget, and with the recent aquisition of the ‘stealth’ frigates from Russia? IN is indeed not interested in another sub platform maybe later on, but not now. even if they do plan to go for a new platform,i have a hunch it will be weaker than the Marlin as no submarine except the US ‘secret’ subs and the scorpene(which is only a very little bit degraded) is among the league of the Marlin.

    India is also building 3 dedicated anti-submarine platforms, plus upgrading its ASuW assets. As regards the degraded Scorpene, thats your ego talking. The reality is that its a generation newer than the Agosta. As regards the paper (yet to be confirmed) Marlin, France & Germany will be only too happy to sell something better to India, conflict economy & all..

    True, and i wont get carried away, but you shouldn’t get carried away in ”underestimation” either 😉

    If we go by wartime performance, the PN is by far the underachiever amongst all three of Paks services by far..

    in reply to: Moslems 'boycott' Glasgow Airport #549328
    Nick_76
    Participant

    A couple of my best mates are of asian origin, (so no I am not anti Asian muslin etc)
    but it’s the old saying, not every muslim is a terrorist but every terrorist is a muslim, (or some bent islamic extremist faith), and this is a shame because people are going to look at Asians in the UK with that ere of suspision, I do agree with the above comment that the muslim communities could do a little more to expell the extremist Jihadis amongst them, and yes alot of muslims were dancing around when 9/11 happened, we play cricket against a pakistani side after 9/11 and the way they were acting was shocking, and I heard a comment about Bin-Laden which was “one man’s enemy is another man’s hero”, I won’t tell you what I said 🙂

    Regarding searches when the wife & I were on our way back from Australia in 2002 we went through security at Sydney and they wanted to inspect our shoes, and then they wanted to ruffle through our suitcase, then I thought, well there’s alot of dirty underwear in there, if they want to sift through it they can carry on http://www.planetsmilies.com/smilies/happy/happy0009.gif

    Well said sir. Ultimately its upto the Muslims to find & finger the bad apples among them. But despite the occasional help in a bomb plot (like this one), the vast majority of them continue to talk of crimes & war against Islam, hence the “reaction” (in my personal experience)- and these the moderate ones. All in all, a worrisome thing & they are just exacerbating the issue.

    in reply to: Pakistan Navy #2044955
    Nick_76
    Participant

    I dont want to go into politics or what they spend their money on. My point is both of Pakistans neighbours (one nuke armed and the other on the verge of being nuked armed), both spend more on defence. You mentioned we spend alot. The best thing would be to spend on butter, nit guns. However, as shown, both of Pakistans neighbours outspend it on in terms of the military.

    What Pakistan has done with such a small defence budget, and signficiant amounts of US and Chinese aid is quite remarkable. The most modern sub fleet in the Gulf/Indian Ocean (obviously barring USN),with anotehr 6 of a new design is quite remarkable.

    This is hyperbole. The IN is also acquiring scorpenes (in greater numbers than the Pakistani Agostas), has Club-S armed upgraded Kilos. If & when the PN does acquire a handful of Marlins, India will choose a better design for itself.

    As regards Pakistans neighbours outspending it in terms of military, in terms of proportion (%) GDP Pak spends more than India, which despite being a much larger nation spends its money more wisely and has a sustainable economic program.

    in reply to: RUSSIAN AESA #2593475
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Irbis is PESA
    But if it achieves its claimed performance, then its sure equal to a first gen AESA

    400km for a 3Sq Mtr RCS :rolleyes: 😎

    in reply to: Indian Air Force News & Discussion June- Aug 2006 #2593477
    Nick_76
    Participant
    in reply to: What will we be left to fight with? #2595529
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Ed,

    I was complimenting you, that was damn funny what you wrote!

    in reply to: Indian Air Force News & Discussion June- Aug 2006 #2595577
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Wouldn’t they save a pretty large chunk of change if they just consolidated their Naval air arm and just fielded a force of MiG-29Ks? They’d save money on developing and testing and then producing a small force of NLCAs. It’d make similar sense to ditch the MiG-29K (or was it part of the Gorshkov deal that they had to buy some…?) and just procure the NLCA, especially if the MiG-29 isn’t chosen for the MRCA.

    Hi Soc,

    The navy doesnt work that way…they are gung-ho on local products compared to the other services..for instance, as you quite correctly point out they dont really require the lca, but see what they did..they first deputed their own pilots to the lca program, then have also released funding for the nlca, on their own..and also committed to assisting ADA with its development effort & navalization..

    If we compare the three services in India, other indian commentators can chip in (esp Harry) but the Navy is mad about indigenization, ie local sourcing..they have their own design teams, own labs (weese) which works with shipbuilders and local r&d as well as their own directorate of indigenization at naval headquarters…see, for example, they pushed the brahmos program (which is now also snapped up by the army & in the future, the AF), they have also pushed for the barak-NG for their own naval sam..

    So in the navys case, pure economics dont factor in for them, what they are concerned with are the strategic aspects of local reliance, plus the fact that they can get local developers to do exactly what they wish..

    for another example, which keeps coming up in discussion on other boards, the navy with drdo designed its own sonars, its own data communications and network warfare systems, its own electronic warfare items..and now all indian ships plus some subs have this equipment, as u note, on a pure cost basis, it would have been cheaper to go outside.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force News & Discussion June- Aug 2006 #2595612
    Nick_76
    Participant

    best thing can happen to mca is that french are roped into the project and lot of the workload will be cut outed goverment knows that ada donot have the resources to bring out a mca in time foreign help will be used some one had posted some mca cad images i thing here will search them

    the french are not exactly overkeen on just handing over their tech on powerplants and aesa radars- the two areas where the mca program would definitely require additional help..

    in reply to: Indian Air Force News & Discussion June- Aug 2006 #2595614
    Nick_76
    Participant

    supplement…the Navy has always been big on local programs..

Viewing 15 posts - 1,921 through 1,935 (of 2,296 total)