dark light

Nick_76

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,936 through 1,950 (of 2,296 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Malaysia to place MiG-29s in storage #2596215
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Khong, excellent post.

    And I am sure, whatever problems or issues Malaysia has- I am sure Malaysians- Chinese, Indian, original Malays can deal with it. They certainly dont need others to prop up and speak for the Malays on ground of some ridiculous claim to shared ethnicity.

    Nick_76
    Participant

    once a iaf pilot had told that f-15 is one of the best he has ever seen (may be after cope air excersie) and he also added f-16 does posee much a threat

    Did u mean to say does or does not? :confused:

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1811440
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Thanks SOC.

    Ok, before the same old same old starts again, are there any SAMs currently tested & in operation which have proven capable of taking on supersonic ASMs (sea skimmers)? With the Brahmos/ Moskit/ KH-31 (iirc even thats supersonic) & that the Klub also has a terminal high speed approach, iirc some Chinese missiles claim likewise…this is an interesting question.

    Answers welcome.

    in reply to: Malaysia to place MiG-29s in storage #2597223
    Nick_76
    Participant

    why does’nt the RMAF tie up with the IAF to train its pilots anyway ? They are getting their technicians trained at HAL anyway..considering that the IAF has such extensive experience with the Su-30-rather than “storing” the entire MiG-29 fleet, RMAF MiG-29 instructors could convert to the Su-30 and come back to train other pilots. that way, they could train more Fulcrum pilots in the meantime without having to stand-down the entire squadron’s Fulcrums.

    Its not like the IAFs instructors are standing around killing time dude…
    Even they are busy..
    Possibly, the IAF could depute a few pilots to RMAF to help out for training…but if there is a lack of training aircraft, then little can be done..

    in reply to: Pakistan AF #2597237
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Pakistani journalists need english lessons from Uncle Sam..not just F-16’s.. :p :dev2:

    in reply to: Best trained pilots in the world? #2598020
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Well they’re certainly better than the other AFs (bar the USAF) that took part in the recent Anatolian Eagle. ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Best trained pilots in the world? #2598040
    Nick_76
    Participant

    I would say

    Pilots with

    1) Recent combat experiance against huge odds
    2) Participating in modern full simulation exercises (Redflag ,Anaotilan Eagle)
    3) Flying in both modern and older jets
    4) Exposure to different training systems exspecially US
    5) Patricipation in coalition air ops

    I know one air force that fufills that criteria ๐Ÿ˜€

    Yup the Turkish AF is pretty good. ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Best trained pilots in the world? #2598043
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Uh oh Yassers back! ๐Ÿ˜Ž :p

    in reply to: Malaysia to place MiG-29s in storage #2598546
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Yup…all racial/ ethnic conspiracy theories aside…there is an exodus of pilots (as all AF worldwide are experiencing to one degree or the other) and their training programs to turn out replacements have had issues..

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1811536
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Kalyan

    Thanks for the excellent effort, but I agree, what idiotic comperes, and so freaking unprofessional….actually the male one..

    Also hyperbole about it being invincible apart, no mention of what DRDO (Navigation attack system/ INS) Larsen & Toubro (Fire control system), BEML (launcher) did…

    The morons cut off Dr Pillai when he starts talking about what the 4 different consortium partners in India did..

    But excellent work by Dr Pillai in explaining how it works…

    in reply to: Malaysia to place MiG-29s in storage #2598549
    Nick_76
    Participant

    there is not ethnic issues here. Only the chinese not interested to be part of armed forces, while there are many indians are interested and are in the armed forces. Even the top MiG-29N pilots are indians.

    ROTFL…dont dare say this Miesten..you’ll be flamed in no short order by our resident ethnicity trumps all types. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    There is no doubt that the “bhumiputras” (sons of the soil) have several advantages in Malaysia, but simplistic- “its racism” complaints based on ethnicity- I doubt that they alone are the reason, why enough pilots are not around..

    in reply to: Indian Air Force News & Discussion June- Aug 2006 #2598562
    Nick_76
    Participant

    i would appreciate if you or anyone else can give me link for this article. thanks.

    $30 billion: Arms bill for five years

    Shopping List: 155-mm Howitzers, Multi-Role Fighter Jets, Advanced UAVs And More…

    Rajat Pandit | TNN

    New Delhi: From 155-mm artillery howitzers and multirole fighter jets to advanced UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) and third-generation night-fighting capabilities, the armed forces are looking to sign several mega defence deals over the next few years.
    In keeping with this desperately needed thrust for modernisation, India plans to spend well over $30 billion (around Rs 140,000 crore) for acquisition of military hardware and software during the 11th Plan period (2007-2012).
    India is already one of the largest defence importers in the world, spending as it did a staggering $6 billion on armament purchases just in 2004-2005. This when two other big buyers, Saudi Arabia and China, notched up defence deals valued between just $2-3 billion each during that year.
    As per the projections in the 11th Defence Plan being finetuned by defence ministry, Indiaโ€™s defence expenditure will cross the notional โ€˜Laxman Rekhaโ€™ of 2.5% of GDP for the first time since the early 1990s. Pakistan and China, incidentally, spend over 4.5% of their GDPs on defence.
    โ€˜โ€˜Though less than the 3% was demanded by armed forces, we expect the defence expenditure to reach 2.57% of GDP in the 11th Plan from the present 2.33%. We are looking at an overall 9% growth in defence expenditure,โ€™โ€™ said an official.
    Estimates for the still-under way 10th Plan (2002-2007) show India would have spent almost Rs 120,000 crore for modernisation of its armed forces by the end of the 2006-2007 fiscal. โ€˜โ€˜In the annual defence budget, around 60% is revenue expenditure (day-today costs), while 40% is the capital component (new procurements). We aim to make it 50-50 in the next few years to ensure more funds for modernisation,โ€™โ€™ he said.
    Itโ€™s no wonder that defence minister Pranab Mukherjee has already declared that $10 billion (Rs 46,000-crore) would flow back into India for investment through โ€˜โ€˜direct offsetsโ€™โ€™ in defence deals during the 11th Plan period.
    The new โ€˜โ€˜offsetโ€™โ€™ clause, introduced by the Defence Procurement Procedure-2005 for all defence deals over Rs 300 crore, ensures that any armament company which bags a large order will be obligated to invest 30% of the total value within India.
    The 11th Plan will, of course, see the signing of the mother of all defence deals, the acquisition of 126 multirole combat aircraft, valued well over $6.5 billion, for IAF.
    The Army, on its part, is desperate for its Rs 8,000-10,000-crore long-term artillery modernisation project to kick off, with the progressive induction of a large number of towed and self-propelled 155mm 52-calibre guns.
    There is, of course, many a slip between the cup and the lip. The defence arena has been plagued by lack of proper long-term planning and inter-service prioritisation, coupled with absence of coordination with finance ministry. The armed forces are keeping their fingers crossed.

    in reply to: What will we be left to fight with? #2556728
    Nick_76
    Participant

    On the flip side, though

    The UK military services remain at the cutting edge of technology

    The numbers may not be there, but which AF would not salivate at the prospect of JSF+EF+AWACS+JSTAR type assets
    Or a Navy with superb stealthy designs and subs, with what are claimed to be amongst the best- if not “the best” sonars ever
    Or an Army which for all its downsizing, still has the Chally2, Longbow Apaches..

    The UK armed forces – by any standards, are amazingly well equipped for a country the size of the UK..

    Nick_76
    Participant

    1. Station 4– cant operate with full flight envelope
    MAWS/ Some “missile evading system” cant be installed

    Thanks to both, certification for station 4 withdrawn

    Alternative

    2. Use central pylon
    Problem for Aussies- thats where the fuel tank goes..

    Ergo Litening / F/A-18 integration is a bother..

    Thats all the article says…

    in reply to: What will we be left to fight with? #2556734
    Nick_76
    Participant

    I read in the current issue of Airforces Monthly that the Government is going to scrap all 119 Gazelle helecopters. They will be replacing them with 20 helecopters leased from a private company.

    Currently all basic flight training in both the AAC and the RAF is conducted in civilian owned and registered aircraft, Grob Tutors in the AAC and Slingsby Fireflys in the RAF.

    What next…?

    Will the JSF be civilian owned?

    Will British Airways provide troop transport to Iraq?

    How long before the Tornado GR4s have sponsorship and advertising logos painted on them?

    20 years ago the world marvelled at the British armed forces.

    Today I think they laugh at us!

    ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€

    That has to be the funniest rant ever!

    This is a close second, by Edlaw

    In 20 years time, at this rate, the Royal Navy will consist of one row-boat, with one shotgun (and one shell) provided, the RAF will consist of one Cessna, with a revolver (and one round) provided, and the Army will consist of one contractor, with a revolver (and no rounds)

    I am still choking on my coffee! ๐Ÿ˜€

Viewing 15 posts - 1,936 through 1,950 (of 2,296 total)