dark light

Nick_76

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,026 through 2,040 (of 2,296 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Nick_76
    Participant

    but doesnt IAF want inedgenous production ? And if that is the case wont they also be able to make spares etc etc ??

    Fair point, but additionally IAF is overreliant on Russia as it is..from the strat point of view…

    India would be better served in using the MRCA deal to get technology from another western source…

    I mean apart from this, theres the Bison, MKI, MiG’s, and the fifth gen project..

    in reply to: Mitsubishi F-2 cockpit and details #2560560
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Yes, I’ve always fournd the F-2 an interesting airplane. Unfortunately, politics and poor decisions have turned it into an overpriced system which will now be seen as a failure.

    The F-2 should have been Japan’s future “do-all” airplane, affordable and built in large numbers.

    Ironic, this plane was a political hot-potato 18 years ago. It was seen as a dangerous technology transfer which could endanger U.S. aerospace to a then seemingly unstoppable Japanese manufacturing sector that would then use the info to best us. Yet, since, we’ve seen practically zero from Japanese aerospace industry and the F-2 is an endangered program.

    You wish! You will be watching mouth agape when that F-2 transforms into a giant robot complete with wrist lasers and samurai sword capable of cutting thru anything!!

    Nick_76
    Participant

    Bloody RAC Mig cant be trusted on spares thats the problem…:(

    Nick_76
    Participant

    Well I guess all the indian lobbying in US congres finally paid dividents. The serious question is if US offers something similar…ie reduced capability F-18 or F-16 for MRCA or even P-8MMA, would Indian armed forces go for it?

    What paid dividends, where?

    Hello…lets be realistic

    The deal is still ON

    Nick_76
    Participant

    Check what’s happened to other ex-NATO F-16s sold to non-NATO countries. Dutch F-16s (same as the Belgian ones) sold to Chile had to have certain items of equipment removed before the USA would agree to the sale. The Dutch had bought them with restrictions on their use & re-sale, despite being a NATO member & one of the most trusted US allies, & Chile isn’t allowed some of the MLU (pre-block 52!) equipment.

    Pakistan isn’t being singled out. These are standard US conditions for non-NATO, non-ANZUS countries.

    Well I hope the PAF listens to Anza & vetos those inferior infidel F-16s made by the Great Satan (tm.)

    I presume that there will be many cases of bubbly uncorked in IAF messes if the PAF ditches the F-16s & goes All- Chinese..

    Nick_76
    Participant

    Wisepanda,

    DRFM is a problem because of China..plain and simple..its just one thing Uncle Sam wont want to get into Chinese hands..at least not like this..but then again, they seem to be ok with JDAMs and AMRAAMs and APPG-68s going across, so who knows..

    What DRFM allows you to do is move away from high power bulky jammers to lighter more sophisticated flexible ones with subtle techniques…not just drown out your opponent in noise..

    Per BR, 8222s were first bought for Sea Harriers and Jaguars,..then of course everything got them..

    M2Ks have Remora not Barracuda..

    I think they have something special not displayed…as we should know M2Ks had a dedicated EW role…and definitely they will require more than just a SPJ..

    Then there were also the MiG 21 Rapiers dedicated for EW with those big Swedish jammers?

    Nick_76
    Participant

    It is quite obvious that you arent aware of the advances in the J-17 and other programs and hence the humour. It has LCD tactical displays D A M M I T !!

    My apologies..I am told that it also has a radar and RWR- that puts it right in F-22 territory! 🙂

    in reply to: Saudi arabia to buy Tigers and NH90 #2560686
    Nick_76
    Participant

    The Khalid is too primitive and infradig for the Saudi moneybags…nothing less than the latest Leclercs or Abrams or Leopards will do for the princes of the desert, so they can take part in fancy shoots and the occasional PR jig for the ruling sheikh. :p

    in reply to: Indian Air Force News & Discussion June- Aug 2006 #2560699
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Brahmos with follow on variant
    Barak NG
    MAWS for Choppers with EADS

    Now this MAWS/ Jammer/ for fighters with Elisra


    In the works/ mentioned

    long range UAVs with IAI
    KS-172
    Active defence system with EADS for tanks
    —-

    Damn, DRDO is on a roll

    They should bloody cooperate for AESA radars- ground based and fighter, PGMs and tank technology as well!

    Nick_76
    Participant

    This seems like great news for PAKISTAN . They were being force fed the F-16 according to some informed members. Now they have reason to dump the F-16 and go for the Mighty J-17 which is more in line with the SU-35 (superior to the MKI) and T-50 , now they can buy more of this superb fighter and less of the yankee c r a p .

    😀 😀 😀

    That was sidesplitting…seriously!

    Nick_76
    Participant

    what is the meaning of the “without DFRAM” ?

    36 Advanced Integrated Defensive Electronic Warfare Suites without Digital Radio Frequency Memory (DRFM); or AN/ALQ-184 Electronic Counter Measures pod without DRFM; or AN/ALQ-131 Electronic Counter Measures pod without DRFM; or AN/ALQ-187 Advanced Self-Protection Integrated Suites without DRFM; or AN/ALQ-178 Self-Protection Electronic Warfare Suites without DRFM;

    Dude DRFM is basically memory which stores the instantaneous phase, amplitude etc information of a received RF wave & this is done in realtime, so the technique generator module in a jammer can then use this & come up with instantaneous countermeasures based on previously coded techniques- ie deception jamming etc.

    Without DRFM, you have to basically set the jammer preflight with all the radar data on possible threats etc having been taken from ELINT/ESM etc.
    So its less flexible and puts a limit on what you can do..

    For instance, you may have coded a particular technique directed against a certain range of waveforms which you sniffed in peacetime or the previous raid..but then this time, the radar operator changes to a different frequency, scan pattern etc, and suddenly your jammer aint so effective anymore..

    Remember fighters etc always have space constraints unlike ships and large platforms, they cant lug around an entire EW reprogramming crew to sit and reprogram whilst the plane whizzes around! 🙂

    But with DRFM, you have a reasonable chance of having a “modified” realtime jamming technique being used, because your jammer just detected the wave (with its own Rx subsystem), extracted and stored the relevant info, and can now generate a countermeasure..

    Now if you see the latest jammers used by grade A nations and their AF’s- DRFM is almost always around in their newer acquisitions…

    India’s Israeli El 8222’s have DRFM
    The new DRDO/ ELisra EW suite has DRFM

    I think someone had posted on other DRDO projects on BR, they were also using DRFM..

    US is using DRFM for all its projects..

    Hope this helped..

    in reply to: U.S. Speeds Up Precision Munition Delivery to Israel #1811938
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Actually I think they should use nukes. Next time a Katyusha lands in Haifa, Beirut becomes a smoking radiating ruin. Then we will see how brave Hezbollah are. :p

    I hope you are not serious

    in reply to: U.S. Speeds Up Precision Munition Delivery to Israel #1811939
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Dear Member,

    This does not make sense. Israel has a robust defense industry that produces their own bombs including guided one. They are operating in a non-electronic threat over Lebanon and they have a very cheap IR kit that turns any bomb into a guided one. The only weapons that the US is speeding up delivery of that Israel can not produce is the bunker buster deep pentration bomb the GBU-28. And they don’t need that 5000 lb monster for Lebanon.

    Also, I watching the news reports on the land incursions into Lebanon by the IDF armored units. They are not being serious about these incursions. No serious numbers, etc.

    I think another shoe is going to drop soon. And it won’t be Lebanon. Syria? Iran? Or both?

    Jack E. Hammond

    The higher end Israeli PGMs with GPS ability- which compare to JDAM type systems…eg SPICE etc are FAR more expensive than US ones…
    That imo is most likely reason.

    in reply to: Mig-29 OVT at RIAT #2561537
    Nick_76
    Participant

    Of course landing such an advanced “34.5657th generation plane” with those nice engine nozzels may be a tat hard:

    http://p.airliners.net/photos/middle/6/4/4/1077446.jpg

    Vaiar

    When did that happen?!?!?

    Also, hilarious signature!

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1812034
    Nick_76
    Participant

    India doesnt has the budget to complete the Agni program. It was a long term investment and it wasnt present India can afford. Their GSLV failure clearly show where the level of India’s might of launching an object to space was still far.It indicated India’s rocket engine has a designing problem which has no reliability at all.Why did they test the Agni2 3-4 times and announcing it’s success?Because they have a political agenda to attract world vision instead of having a plan…..

    China facing the same problem in 1980s and thanks to her intelligence services,saving time & money to making the bottleneck of technology was solved. That was just a begining,after a heavy investment of budget in 1990s & 2000s that bought a perfect DF31 ICBM & JL2SLBM.
    The Agni3 was around China 1960s DF4 missle level,the agni wasnt a real ‘deterent’ if compared with China’s DF21 or DF31 missles. China has finished those already & switched to JL2 SLBM. And we completed the building of a 094 SSBN. So if this is a matchup with China, this is a miserable humilation,it showed the gap was huge……

    Failure was normal,it is true every country including US,USSR.. but this agni flight was just a political ‘making waves’ instead of a real one.None of the country ever seen this is an ‘alarm’ if compared with North Korean’s Taepodong2. Because North Korea has a mature program to make it ‘real’,India’s Agni3 was just a part of her ‘political announcement’. It was happy too early to call it a success because the Agni3 poped up for 12000m. That wasnt special, German A4 missles did that in very early days already….
    Without some ‘big country’ support, these missles rally cant go on,Pakistan & N Korea their own cant do present high success rate without foreign assitances.

    Thank you for your nationalistic rant. Please do share what you are smoking with the rest of us, we can all have a go as well.

    Sincerely!

Viewing 15 posts - 2,026 through 2,040 (of 2,296 total)