Lancman, if you have a Lancaster you would like doing then PM me, anything to keep in practice on Photoshop seven is handy.
best regards, steve
Never knew Isaacs made a corsair 😉
Re: lancasters
Originally posted by peter
The ex wallis island Lancaster will look great when she is all done. They have done an excellent job on the aircraft. Who knows dont rule out a possible ground run aty some time!
I admire your optimism pete but i doubt this will happen, The Le Bourget museum doesnt seem to have a policy of ground running aircraft so the expense of finding four merlin engines to fit in the Lanc that could run would be rather pointless for Ailes Ancienne to bother with.
Lets be content with three running lancs,
well, until next year, eh Pete 😉
Re: Flying Lancasters
Originally posted by Dave Homewood
Is the Lancaster that’s being restored in France intended to be a flyer or s it just for static display?I have also been wondering about the Lancs in Dambusters. They used three it seems. What squadron were they from? And when they were retired what happened to them, are they in museums, or did they do the usual unthinkable?
Ailes Ancienne are restoring the ex Wallis Island for the Le Bourget museum. They are doing this to Static condition, a very high static condition by the looks of it too.
The Dam Busters (two words, sorry to be pedantic 😉 ), was filmed at RAF Scampton and released in 1954, the Lancs used were brought out of retirement from storage for the role and later were scrapped. I dont know how long since the filming it was before they did this. Lincolns from an operational unit were used as long distance set dressing.
-steve
Originally posted by Dez
Melvyn, i think your comments are a bit hard, however each to there own opinion!;)I feel that the museum is going through a very transitional period and im sure plans are a foot to sort out some of the comments you and others have made…
The thing to remember is though is that these are OUR aircraft. They are national assets and the RAF Museum is a national museum therefore they should listen to the public comment on how these artefacts are being cared for and displayed. Sadly they do not. Complaints about the lighting at Hendon and S-Sugar have been raised time before whether it be through comment forms, letters, verbal concerns or thorugh lancman foaming at the mouth by the Lanc 😉
We shoudl be thankful we have such a fantastic collection of aircraft which are in dry covered surroundings but none of us can kid ourselves that the way aircraft are presented at Hendon is in the league of say Duxford or Elvington.
Robbo, i took the liberty of making your picture more acceptable, we mustn’t mention the other magazine 😉 nice colour, the blue and the yellow are both nice but it depends on what you are wearing i guess. 🙂
How about a little competition then,someone posts up a black and white picture of an aircraft and we can all have a go at doing a realistic version or simply let loose and go mad with it?
Excellent bit of work Snapper, i empathise with you on the amount of time it took. Great stuff.
Steve
Originally posted by Arm Waver
No but it keeps straining my neck!!
She strained mine too when she flew over :p I really don’t want to become the infamous forum member whose avatar resulted in numerous falling backwards off chair injuries 🙂
Thanks for the info chaps,
steve
Originally posted by Dave Homewood
It would be good if they could make it interchangable between the ugly but interesting Mk 1 nose and the lovlier Mk IV nose, using a big zip or perhaps velcro or something!! LOL
Or perhaps a tupperware seal, it has marvellous preservative qualities, don’t you know? 😀
Would the Mk1 nose on the IV aircraft be an authentic mix? Did the Mk1 and MkIV have the same dimensions etc? I just wondered how such a change would go down with the CAA. Would they be in a way creating a new Mk by mixing the two.
It would be interesting to see the Blenheim with a Mk1 nose, im happy to see it with whichever nose though to be honest.
Steve
Originally posted by Snapper
So, before Steve gets this thread pulled for his obnoxious and insulting behaviour, i’d like to second him. Perhaps if it hadn’t become so bloody boring over the past couple of years I would renew the subscription I kept taking out. Hell, I look in WH Smiths and buy it maybe once a bloody year now! No good. Get it back how we liked it.Bye Corgi, Bye Diverse Images. Hello Historic Aviation and the subjects that are interesting.
Mind you, at least it pays for this site where we DO get what we want, and on demand daily. Good show Key, bloody well done.
Yes, ill add my thanks for the forum, its all to easy to forget the good and just concentrate on the bad. The forum is an excellent provision for the readers or, in my case, ex readers.
Originally posted by Chad Veich
There are in fact two “Dakota” 109s, neither of which has ever been flown to my knowledge. The in flight photos are definitely Photoshopped
how do you know? Is your source certain? Ive been looking at the photos trying to look for parts where they have been maniupulated, tell tale signs etc, im still looking though. The seocnd aircraft in the air is a duplicate of the first aircraft in the foreground from another photo (different angle etc) and extra markings have been applied. The stains on the aircraft and camoflage are identical on both so its likely these are the same. The pictures though seem to have been taken from a genuine airborne sortie.
Best Regards, Steve
Mark, thanks for the pictures. Very interesting.
Note to Flypast, why not run an article on the epic restoration of this Hampden in Canada, it would beat the current run of endless articles on Spits, Mustang, Diverse Images and Corgi. Why not even have an article on the groups in Norway who locate the remains of the JU88s’ they have found? I’ll tell you why not, they are too busy writing articles on fighters that have been rebuilt to stock condition and that usually are one of the aforementioned.
Begging for the Flypast of old, Steve
http://mosquito.mech.brad.ac.uk/museum-explorer/display_photo.php?Photo=758
a photo on this excellent site.
A project can also be found at the Lincolnshire Aviation Heritage Centre (home of NX611). A cockpit section was being rebuilt to static condition (good prgress too) but sadly the man behind the project died. I think from what i read at the time that the project would continue. More substantial hampden parts can be found there also.