I’m assuming the differences would similar to the RB211’s in the 743’s as opposed to the RB211’s in the 744’s.
Originally posted by Bmused55
last known photo of the old gal in one piece (more or less)Broken up a few months later
RIP
This photo posted by Sandy was taken at San Bernardino International Airport, formerly known as Norton AirForce Base, which is about a half hour drive from where I live. I was at an airliner enthusiast show a few years ago shortly after they broke up Clipper Juan Trippe, and they were selling some of the pieces. I actually drove right by this bird around 1995 a few times, and I had no idea of its significance at the time. Why it was at SBD, I have no idea, as this was the only ‘stored’ airliner on the premises at the time. SBD has a few cargo flights and that’s it. It’s really not used for storage a la Victorville, Mojave, Marana, etc.
Thanks Elias. Your effort is above and beyond anything I would expect. I appreciate it.
Fantastic shots!
Originally posted by Bmused55
Excuse me while I roll around with laughter
Is this your work Sandy?
I take no offense to this commentary. It’s all good.
I thought the TG/UA 744 sale was a dead issue.
Definitely a QF 707. Besides, did QANTAS ever operate a T-tail aircraft?
It’s not water sucked in from the tarmac, per se. It’s the effect of the engine spooling up really fast
I thought it was something that Skylinerworld had made up.
What is Titan Airways? Is that a made-up airline?
I think I will echo the sentiments of MikeC and Steve and say Hooters Air. The Cabin Crew is significantly, above average.
Originally posted by Ren Frew
What’s the little mini tornado being created called ?
That is called a lot of air being sucked into a very small space all at once.
Elias, this is very insightful research, and a great thread at that. You mentioned airlines such as Lufthansa, Alitalia, Air France, etc. pulling out of Australia due to ‘low demand.’ One Euro airline pulling out of Australia that still baffles me to this day is Olympic. Surely they did not pull out due to low demand. As I’ve mentioned on several other occassions in this forum, the first choice for Greeks in Australia flying back to the homeland was Olympic. When all those seats were booked, then they would book on the ‘better’ airlines such as Singapore, Emirates, and Thai. Demand was clearly not a problem here, unless you know something that I do not. For over 20 years this route was operated by the 742. For the last 2 or so years of operation, more fuel efficient, albeit less capacity, A343’s were used. A few months ago, OA signed an agreement with GulfAir and now funnel their pax onho their flights, with one additional stop in Bahrain. This is great and all, but I have several questions perhaps you can provide some insight on:
1) Why did they pull out of the market if load factors were high?
2) Was is more profitable to operate a 742 with say 420 seats in a 2 class configuration or more a fuel efficient 343 with say 280 seats in a 2 class configuration?
3) Would an airline discontinue a route if it was profitable?
I thank you in advance for your insight.
That is fantastic. I love classic 747’s from Pan Am and TWA.