dark light

greekdude1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 3,029 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What Sabena could have been #648208
    greekdude1
    Participant

    That looks great Sandy. That’s a derivation of the Air Tahiti Nui livery, isn’t it?

    in reply to: Air France – KLM merger perfect #648400
    greekdude1
    Participant

    What about the Swiss Army? They make cool watches.

    in reply to: Birmingham to Brussels on SN Brussels Airlines #648438
    greekdude1
    Participant

    Nice report Comet, but, err, wheres this photo of you then? 😉

    You took the words right out of my mouth. Where is the photo of you, Comet? 😀 The rest of the photos are great, by the way, and good report.

    in reply to: Bogus Picture?? What Say You? #648442
    greekdude1
    Participant

    Any photo taken by Sam Chui IS NOT bogus. He’s one of the most respected photographers on any of those photo sites. He takes pics everywhere. As far as the question about the undercarriage, it has just been retracted, with the nosewheel doors still open.

    greekdude1
    Participant

    All the legs on Star Alliance?

    Yes sir! I Redeemed 80,000 miles for a business class round trip ticket to Europe. I’m doing ONT-DEN-IAD-JFK on UA then JFK-FRA on SQ and FRA-AMS on LH. By the discontinuation of SQ23 EWR-AMS, (which was just a continuation of SIN-AMS-EWR) due to this new non-stop SIN-EWR service, it added 2 more segments to my outbound (originally it was going to be ONT-DEN-EWR-AMS with the last leg being operated by SQ). When I booked my trip, the Star Alliance timetable had the EWR-AMS service operating until July 23rd, to which it would be replaced by the non-stop service thereafter. Seeing as I was leaving on July 21st, I would be flying on one of the last services. Apparantly, they moved up the launch date of the non-stop service to late June, which is why they switched me over to SQ25 JFK-FRA, so I had to get to JFK instead of EWR, and then go from FRA to AMS on LH. On the return journey, my itinerary wasn’t affected because we had already anticipated SQ not not having the AMS-EWR segment anymore, so I just had the travel agent do AMS-IAD-DEN-ONT, all on UA. The only segments out of this whole itinerary that won’t be in business will be the ONT-DEN-ONT legs because those are now TED flights, which are all economy. 😡

    in reply to: 7E7 question #648589
    greekdude1
    Participant

    Now that Airbus are offering proper engines (ie RR Trents), that shouldn’t be a problem… 😉

    Right, just ask Iberia. 😉

    in reply to: The Observer: "Virgin USA to get A319/320s." #648600
    greekdude1
    Participant

    SFO makes more sense. They have no lo-co’s based there, and Southwest has a very small SFO presence. They would obviously have to compete with UA, but competing with majors is nothing new for lo-co’s. I don’t see them being based in New York unless it’s EWR. JFK already has Jetblue, and I don’t realistically see 2 lo-co’s being based at the same airport. LGA really isn’t suited for that type of operation, as slots are limited as it is.

    greekdude1
    Participant

    greekdude1-
    Oy. They should know.

    What? Who should know?

    greekdude1
    Participant

    This service was set to start in late July, but now they are bumping it up. I had booked an itinerary and was scheduled to fly from EWR to AMS on SQ23 on July 21st. When I went to ticket it, they had re-booked me onto SQ25 from JFK-FRA, but I didn’t have connections in either city. I asked the UA travel agent why they did that, but they didn’t know. I had to re-do my whole itinerary, but I didn’t care. I’m just flying more segments now (5) on the outbound into AMS.

    in reply to: Would a Qantas-ANZ equity deal be anti-competitive #650451
    greekdude1
    Participant

    I personally think this deal is anti-competitive. You have the 2 biggest Airlines in Oceania, both of whom have decent Intl route structures, forming a monopolistic alliance. How is EK and Pacific Blue such a threat to either of these airlines? EK just entered the trans-Tazman market, and sure they have a huge cash base. How many flights do they operate in that market, however? The fact that the whole NZ-QF tie-up has taken this long should say something. It should not be allowed to happen. Where would this leave each airline in their respective alliances?

    in reply to: Air Scotland's 757 #650600
    greekdude1
    Participant

    And yes, the Tail is meant to be the Saltire. Not a greek flag at an angle.

    I never doubted this Sandy. I was just pointing out that it worked the other way, as well, and that it was ironic in a sense.

    in reply to: 7E7 livery on a 737 (no photoshop either!) #650607
    greekdude1
    Participant

    if you look at the picture, it says Air Berlin on the tailplane.

    I did not notice that initially, but now I see it. Good lookin’ out Bhoy.

    in reply to: 7E7 livery on a 737 (no photoshop either!) #651078
    greekdude1
    Participant

    So then this aircraft will be in commercial service with Air Berlin sporting these colours with the Boeing titles still, or with their own?

    in reply to: 7E7 livery on a 737 (no photoshop either!) #651091
    greekdude1
    Participant

    This is a regular 737 (800 I believe) that will be delivered to Air Berlin shortly.

    This means that this lovely livery will be donned for only a short time. Such a waste of money.

    in reply to: 7E7 livery on a 737 (no photoshop either!) #651152
    greekdude1
    Participant

    I thought they were getting rid of the eyebrow windows.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 3,029 total)