I think its crazy we dont have a Prime Ministerial plane.
One of the richest countries on the planet, lets act the part. Dress to impress e.t.c
I don’t want a 747 or anything an A330 would be fine.
Just gonna post my C3 again – sorry chaps

Change the front gun for Mk8 – although I still think thats overkill for the situation.
sferrin joins the discussion. I would rather the RN went for the F35C or the B than the super hornet. But I would love for them to chose the Super Hornet so I could repost his post.
you think they might be interested in buying a number of Challanger 2’s from us. We wont be using them any more 🙁
As some one that actually helped in the election with general stuff for the conservatives, I can’t believe this from Mr Osborne I really can’t.
I really do wonder if the UK Forces will ever be able to recover from these cuts.
What a wonderfully juvenille rant!. What operations are hamstrung exactly in your opinion?. What CAN a Fleet Carrier do, that we plausibly may have a requirement to do, that the Carrier Strike platform cant do cheaper and more efficiently?.
Juvenille rant? Don’t believe I was ranting Jonesy, because I dont agree with you doesnt mean its a rant. I might not have been here as long as you or posted as many times as you, but I always try to post with respect.
We have exactly the same requirements from our Carriers that the French, US navy have and you wont see them operating the Strike Carriers. Part of the reason the Argies did the damage they did was because of our switch to Stike Carriers.
“or that EMCAT works and they will switch to catapult based fighter, in either scenario the high cost of keeping the Harrier’s running is just not worth the extra cost.”
Can we put this one to bed now?. The ONLY criteria that will see a CATOBAR conversion for CVF-01 as completed is a total cancellation of F-35B. Returning to catapult operation throws away the whole operational concept of UK Carrier Strike as currently defined.
We will not put ourselves back in the situation of tying ourselves down to the need to maintain deck qualified pools of pilots, with reduced sortie rates, reduced airframe lives and higher shipboard operational costs just on a whim to say a few million quid per airframe.
I hate this – Strike Carrier’s are one of the worst decisions we ever made. We have tied ourselves into a situation where our carrier operations are hamstrung and limited in their capacity. You want a Carrier that can really do something let’s make it a Fleet Carrier and stop talking rubbish.
Our navy needs its own Fix Wing back and the RAF need to be reduced drastically in their importance and influence. The fact we use Sea King AEW is a disgrace that will one day leave us exposed to serious threats.
I looked at the RUSI – they rehashed what has been said on a number of occassions. I completely support the idea of having only 4 launch tubes on a sub for nuclear deterrant BUT it must be CASD. I want BAE to start looking at an elongated Astute now and come to the table with plans to implement this.
We have 7 Astute planned at the moment. I want when number 7 is finnished for work to begin on Astute II SSBN.
nice little piece about catapults on the CVF
nice picture on ship bucket although the planes look wrong in terms of scale.
US should be offer to refuel the planes for Isreal and then helping to do the job.
such a terrible compromise – hate it.
Do we have any news pics of the work being done? Really looking forward to seeing her on sea trials.
Perfect customer – Lockhead Martin.
What beter way to sell the plane than sail around demonstrating how little carriers will be ok in the modern age with this jet.
agreed with Swerve.
A mini CVF it is then :P!