dark light

Stan hyd

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 563 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: "Blair force one" ?? #2409663
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    I think its crazy we dont have a Prime Ministerial plane.

    One of the richest countries on the planet, lets act the part. Dress to impress e.t.c

    I don’t want a 747 or anything an A330 would be fine.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part II #2419786
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    Just gonna post my C3 again – sorry chaps

    http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/194/c3news.png

    Change the front gun for Mk8 – although I still think thats overkill for the situation.

    in reply to: UK to ditch F35B for Super Hornet? #2420312
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    sferrin joins the discussion. I would rather the RN went for the F35C or the B than the super hornet. But I would love for them to chose the Super Hornet so I could repost his post.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part II #2372243
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/article-view/release/117096/finland-to-upgrade-f_18-fighters-in-1-bn-euro-program.html

    you think they might be interested in buying a number of Challanger 2’s from us. We wont be using them any more 🙁

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part II #2378209
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    As some one that actually helped in the election with general stuff for the conservatives, I can’t believe this from Mr Osborne I really can’t.

    I really do wonder if the UK Forces will ever be able to recover from these cuts.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2030233
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    What a wonderfully juvenille rant!. What operations are hamstrung exactly in your opinion?. What CAN a Fleet Carrier do, that we plausibly may have a requirement to do, that the Carrier Strike platform cant do cheaper and more efficiently?.

    Juvenille rant? Don’t believe I was ranting Jonesy, because I dont agree with you doesnt mean its a rant. I might not have been here as long as you or posted as many times as you, but I always try to post with respect.

    We have exactly the same requirements from our Carriers that the French, US navy have and you wont see them operating the Strike Carriers. Part of the reason the Argies did the damage they did was because of our switch to Stike Carriers.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2030277
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    “or that EMCAT works and they will switch to catapult based fighter, in either scenario the high cost of keeping the Harrier’s running is just not worth the extra cost.”

    Can we put this one to bed now?. The ONLY criteria that will see a CATOBAR conversion for CVF-01 as completed is a total cancellation of F-35B. Returning to catapult operation throws away the whole operational concept of UK Carrier Strike as currently defined.

    We will not put ourselves back in the situation of tying ourselves down to the need to maintain deck qualified pools of pilots, with reduced sortie rates, reduced airframe lives and higher shipboard operational costs just on a whim to say a few million quid per airframe.

    I hate this – Strike Carrier’s are one of the worst decisions we ever made. We have tied ourselves into a situation where our carrier operations are hamstrung and limited in their capacity. You want a Carrier that can really do something let’s make it a Fleet Carrier and stop talking rubbish.

    Our navy needs its own Fix Wing back and the RAF need to be reduced drastically in their importance and influence. The fact we use Sea King AEW is a disgrace that will one day leave us exposed to serious threats.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2030280
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    I looked at the RUSI – they rehashed what has been said on a number of occassions. I completely support the idea of having only 4 launch tubes on a sub for nuclear deterrant BUT it must be CASD. I want BAE to start looking at an elongated Astute now and come to the table with plans to implement this.

    We have 7 Astute planned at the moment. I want when number 7 is finnished for work to begin on Astute II SSBN.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2030447
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    nice little piece about catapults on the CVF

    http://www.janes.com/news/defence/jni/jni100726_1_n.shtml

    in reply to: 1952 aircraft carrier #2030617
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    nice picture on ship bucket although the planes look wrong in terms of scale.
    http://www.shipbucket.com/Never%20Built%20Designs/Great%20Britain/GB%20CV%201952%20Carrier%20Design%201.gif

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – V #2381833
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    US should be offer to refuel the planes for Isreal and then helping to do the job.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2030801
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    such a terrible compromise – hate it.

    in reply to: Indian Navy News and Discussions #2031104
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    Do we have any news pics of the work being done? Really looking forward to seeing her on sea trials.

    in reply to: what will happen to the invincible Class carriers? #2031393
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    Perfect customer – Lockhead Martin.

    What beter way to sell the plane than sail around demonstrating how little carriers will be ok in the modern age with this jet.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part I #2386386
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    agreed with Swerve.

    A mini CVF it is then :P!

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 563 total)