Page 31 – Key Publishing

Stan hyd

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 563 total)

← 1 2 3 … 30 31 32 … 36 37 38 →

Author

Posts
September 15, 2009 at 3:33 pm in reply to: CVF Construction #2022873

Stan hyd
Participant

thank god for penalty clauses.

The only way it seems to keep a british government doing what they said they would do!.

Im all for the A400M cancellation. Buy more C-130’s and C-17s

Leave the euro fighter and carriers alone.

I know though knowing our policitians they will scrap the JSF deal and say we can make do with Harriers. Or only buy 30.

September 15, 2009 at 2:56 pm in reply to: CVF Construction #2022889

Stan hyd
Participant

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6835280.ece

Dear god and to think I am campaigning for them. Ill stop today

September 15, 2009 at 10:24 am in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2022908

Stan hyd
Participant

Its obvious that the Russians are new to the whole game of window shopping, your not meant to shout out loud I want that that that that that and that. Especially when there is very little chance of you actually buying it!

September 14, 2009 at 1:18 pm in reply to: What next for the RAN? #2023007

Stan hyd
Participant

As for the ANZAC replacement, I do like the idea of an Aegis-less version of the Hobart class, rather than a whole new design. Ideally, though, these should still be pretty darned capable ships, with the CEAFAR radar, a good size VLS. By using pretty much the same design as the Hobart, crews can move around within the fleet with few problems. It makes support a lot easier, and overall would help with streamlining of the fleet.

I think your right on with this and think it would be the best move for the RAN

September 14, 2009 at 10:40 am in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2023015

Stan hyd
Participant

I’m sure that eventually other countries will be able to produce steam catapults, they just havent put any time into it yet.

Hell a korean firm could just buy the british firm and have the designs that way.

I think we should expect other countries to be using catapults in the not too distant future, especially those nations that dont have access to the fantastic F-35B. This really does highlight why the RN CVF should be built with EMALS from the start :rolleyes:

I for one will be happy to see more and more carrriers in the world, they are fantastic machines.

September 13, 2009 at 1:44 pm in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2023118

Stan hyd
Participant

Ok a little change to a drawing done that I posted before.

Generic carrier built by Korean yards for potential customers round the world. I’m hoping that they would be able to reproduce the steam catapults.

September 11, 2009 at 2:10 pm in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2023320

Stan hyd
Participant

No interest in the Indian new carrier (designed with a lot of Italian help and many western systems)?

I like the what I have seen of them but I would like to see some more details images. Any one know where I can find one?

September 11, 2009 at 12:08 pm in reply to: CVF Construction #2023333

Stan hyd
Participant

Tell you something though, if they do find oil. I want another 4 Eurofighters down that way.

Also wouldnt mind sending a Type 23 and a Type 42 on a routine visit.

September 11, 2009 at 10:26 am in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2023357

Stan hyd
Participant

Thats an interesting design – I would like to see the whole thing including systems and weapons.

September 10, 2009 at 9:49 pm in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2023383

Stan hyd
Participant

i was talking about a carrier for brazil

September 10, 2009 at 5:41 pm in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2023397

Stan hyd
Participant

CVF will be expensive as hell. I seriously believe ti woul dbe possible to put together a 40k carrier capable of operating 20-25 jets with AEW as well for soemthing in the region of $900mill -1bill

September 10, 2009 at 4:11 pm in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2023414

Stan hyd
Participant

You forgot Thailand, and USA:eek:

lol im such a plonker. oh well sorted now. Gonna put some work in on my standardised Carrier platform.

September 10, 2009 at 3:19 pm in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2023434

Stan hyd
Participant

Nations that currently run aircraft carriers

UK
Russia
India
Brazil
France
Italy
Spain
USA
Thailand

Nations that will/could Operate carriers in the near future

Australia (F-35b if they wanted too)
China

Nations that I believe could Operate a 40k tone carrier in the future Im talking the next 15 years or soo. This would be based on a commercially built carrier operating something like the Rafeal or something Russia/China could preduce…

Turkey
Mexico
Canada
Australia (maybe one day common!)

September 10, 2009 at 2:05 pm in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2023444

Stan hyd
Participant

I’ve always been interested in the design that came out of Argentina, I wonder if this could be a model for a generic aircraft carrier that could be sold around the world as the Air Craft carrier becomes as must have for emerging nations?

September 10, 2009 at 12:06 pm in reply to: Does the RN need SSBN's anymore? #2023451

Stan hyd
Participant

Yes we do.

Although I dont want to have to pay for them 😛
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 563 total)

← 1 2 3 … 30 31 32 … 36 37 38 →