dark light

Stan hyd

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 563 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Navies news from around the world #2027816
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    SKorea, US team up to build and export Aegis warships

    US defence group Lockheed Martin and South Korea’s Hyundai Heavy Industries will team up to build and export mid-size warships equipped with advanced Aegis weapons systems, an official said Wednesday.
    They signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) in May 2006 to jointly produce Aegis-equipped guided missile ships, Hyundai Heavy spokesman Cho Woo-Tae told AFP.

    Cho said it is thought to be very rare for Lockheed to partner with a foreign company to produce Aegis-equipped vessels for possible sale to a third country.

    Aegis, one of the most advanced naval defence systems, is designed to simultaneously track and destroy a multiple number of incoming missiles.

    Asked why the agreement was not made public for three years, the spokesman said Hyundai Heavy rarely discloses MoUs. “I believe Lockheed decided to disclose it to the media probably because there is some progress in looking for buyers.”

    Hyundai Heavy is the world’s biggest shipbuilder.

    “The idea is that the partnership would make it possible to build high profit-margin warships at a reasonable price,” said Cho.

    Concrete terms need to be fixed but the two firms could produce 4,000 to 6,000-ton ships under the joint project, Cho said.

    He added the vessels could be sold to third countries such as India but no firm decisions had been made given the sensitivity of the technology.

    South Korea’s navy in May 2007 launched its first Aegis-equipped warship, the 7,600-ton Sejong the Great, jointly built by Hyundai and Lockheed.

    It was used to track North Korea’s long-range rocket launch in April, along with US Aegis ships.

    South Korea plans to launch a second Aegis destroyer in 2010 and a third in 2012, in an attempt to keep up with the naval powers of Japan and China.

    http://www.spacewar.com/reports/SKorea_US_team_up_to_build_and_export_Aegis_warships_999.html

    I cant wait to see some designs from this partnership. If I were a nation looking to build up its fleet again this would be music to my ears. I think Canada, Chile , New Zealand should be looking at what comes out of this.

    in reply to: Royal Navy C3 #2027821
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    I would love to leave the VSL on there but you are probably right, wont happen.

    I do think though that this would be an excellent vessel on which to base the C3, what I would be worried about though is the MOD changing the design, ending up with something a little bigger but without the missiles and it coming in at 200mill a piece.

    You give me this ship at £100 a pop and we should eat them up. I really would look at the RAM system though, its dirt cheap for what it does!!!!

    in reply to: Royal Navy C3 #2027847
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    I love this ship and its design.

    Im right there with you. Let me order 16 of these babies now.

    Slight extension to the ship

    http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/6486/falkland.png

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2027997
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    INS Vikramaditya is looking good.
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_o_no4M2xEPY/SmDX2UdM1bI/AAAAAAAAHoo/AKbYMeCyQR0/s1600/118-797094.jpg

    in reply to: UK Helicopter's requested for Afganistan #2433692
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    for the time scale people are going to demand we cant get Merlins. Lets buy a helicopter thats already in theatre in mass numbers so that if we have an issue with spares we can get them off the yanks in an emergency. Those boys are already flying in spare parts every week of the year so lets say great supply lines can you add a few of this and that for us.

    We buy 10-20 hawks now and im sure we can get them crewed and in afghanistan in no time.

    in reply to: UK Helicopter's requested for Afganistan #2433754
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    The only helicopter we should be loking to buy at this sort of time and with the time scale needed is Blackhawks. Lets get our pilots over to the USA now and training from pumas to these shouldnt take too long.

    in reply to: Massive cost over run on CVF #2028426
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    Simply because those two factors would drive up the running costs year-on-year, which far outweigh initial acquisition costs, for no useable advantage.

    CVF with STOVL is the best solution possible for UK Carrier Strike. Its not the best solution to make CVF a Fleet Carrier but thats not the RN requirement right now!.

    Thats fine and everything, I still believe they should be fitted with EMALS when they are launched and wires.

    I think we should continue to look at ways to make the CVF more effective and without doubt the inclusion of these things would help. We could operate Hawkeyes, we could look to purchase a limited number of Growlers e.t.c

    I know its fairy tale stuff but I would much rather they were fitted with than for.

    in reply to: Colossus/Majestic class #2028527
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    I wonder if you might know the max weight that these ine ships could accommodate and launch.

    I do think your right about carrier ops and how the rest of nato really does need to “lend a hand” so to speak.

    With the US Marines looking like they will be operating the F-35B and the RN, Spanish and Italians all doing the same of their Carriers, this is the time for other nations to get back in the Carrier game.

    Im sure that a Spanish/ Italian design of around 25,000 tonnes would be the answer and provide NATO / the west with cover for lots of scenarios, I would like to see some stats based on a 25 tonne carrier operating 12 F-35B when compared to the new Indian carrier operating the Mig 29 and also russian carriers operating the SU-33

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world #2028609
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    uh-oh…

    I for one would not be worried about allowing the Russians to join in with the CVF project, hell between the Russians and the British we wrote the book on ski ramp carriers! Especially if our ship yards get to build them.

    I wouldnt like to share the development of frigates and destroyers and subs, but everything else lets get some cash in.

    in reply to: JMSDF 16DDH #2029410
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/7900/cvs.png

    Thanks shipbucket, Crazyhorse and MihoshiK for their original drawings.

    just do this and get it done with 😛

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2030188
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    Hey Maxi – had a look at your ship again and tried to convert it into shipbucket style.

    Some slight changes to use parts already out there but hope you like it.

    http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/9937/maxicgn.png

    in reply to: Massive cost over run on CVF #2030221
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    only 1? .. i seriously expect by the end of it we will be 1.7+ over

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2030747
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    Ha, I was wondering when you might find this board maximuscle those were my first ships done in paint I have some
    New ideas for them now trying to get them done to shipbucket standards 🙂
    .

    When I get back from prague I was going to have a stab at another couple of c1 designs .

    in reply to: Royal Navy C3 #2030930
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    I like this design a lot let’s just have this made for us

    http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x155/rwmesquite/SHIP_CGC_NSC_Bertholf_Machinery_Tri.jpg

    in reply to: Royal Navy C3 #2031063
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    Im kinda liking these pictures

    http://www.meretmarine.com/article.cfm?id=110554

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 563 total)