dark light

pat1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 224 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hawker fueselage tubes #1021371
    pat1968
    Participant

    Pat1968,

    Tried to PM you back but your mailbox is full.

    Ian

    Hi Ian sorry about that my inbox is now empty Pat

    in reply to: Hawker fueselage tubes #1033759
    pat1968
    Participant

    Pat1968,

    Tried to PM you back but your mailbox is full.

    Ian

    Hi Ian sorry about that my inbox is now empty Pat

    in reply to: Hawker fueselage tubes #1021637
    pat1968
    Participant

    Hi Ian that is exactly what i need many thanks pm sent

    in reply to: Hawker fueselage tubes #1034133
    pat1968
    Participant

    Hi Ian that is exactly what i need many thanks pm sent

    in reply to: Hawker fueselage tubes #1022605
    pat1968
    Participant

    definately has a tubular egine bearer and cocpit section the rear fueselage was monocoque. The sea fury was completely monocoque.

    DaveR you inbox is full!!!

    in reply to: Hawker fueselage tubes #1035510
    pat1968
    Participant

    definately has a tubular egine bearer and cocpit section the rear fueselage was monocoque. The sea fury was completely monocoque.

    DaveR you inbox is full!!!

    in reply to: Messerschmitt 109-E for Medway? #1047667
    pat1968
    Participant

    This may be a silly question and i will probably be banned from Hendon forever more anyway. But why is this particular aircraft being earmarked for restoration?

    in reply to: Aerosale at Old Sarum #1047775
    pat1968
    Participant

    great idea!

    in reply to: P40 thread #1051070
    pat1968
    Participant

    Pat,

    Now you are taking my words out of context. I didnt imply he was a bounty hunter – here are my words:

    As Tony says, time for a deep breath – this will get us nowhere.

    Bruce

    Bruce I don’t know qattarra personally but i know a few things about him. If you don’t know something just say you don’t. I am interested to know why you suggest that we should take his comments with a pinch of salt? Regardless of unanswered questions about search methods, the probability of finding the remains as they did in the timeframe they did etc etc the fact remains they have a track record in this field. They have discovered remains that warrant further investigation and the man delivering the information is a qualified doctor. That informatiom (i.e
    the discovery of human remains )has now been comfirmed by reliable and qualified source.
    So why should I take what he says with a pinch of salt?

    in reply to: P40 thread #1051083
    pat1968
    Participant

    Putting two and two together and getting five, it is beginning to sound like someone wanted to do a dramatic TV documentary a la “Who do you think you are” type of thing. At least with the airframe offsite, it reduces the scope for such excesses.

    I have to say after the clamour for publicity i have witnessed on this forum regarding the P40 I am tempted to describe your comments as being more than a little hippocritical? I assume the ‘excesses’ of the mass media are tolerable whilst they serve to help in the recovery of the aircraft but not apparently the pilot? The purpose of that clamour for publicity on this forum was to fascilitate the speedy recovery of the aircraft and was certainly not done with the support of the family as they had still not been informed. The plan to document the recovery was very much about searching for and recovering Dennis Copping. Because as has been pointed out on a number of occaisions the MOD and RAFM have neither the interest or ability to do it, despite clearly having had the opportunity.

    in reply to: P40 thread #1051437
    pat1968
    Participant

    qattara is respected anesthesiologist, i am not sure how you can imply that he could be bounty hunter? I agree that there are many questions regarding the discovery of the remains found but we don’t have the full story and english is not qattaras first language and frankly i don’t think he feels the need to justify himself to the forum. The fact is the remains are human and without carrying out a DNA analysis we will never know. All we know at present is that they are human and are worthy of further investigation. Extraction of DNA could have been carried out during the recovery of the aircraft. Forensic services have been offered free of charge to the MOD and the RAFM. The idea that my comments could jeopardise a potential recovery is frankly nonsense. Why does it take the removal of the aircraft to facilitate a search for the pilot? The reality is that now the aircraft has been removed there is no motivation to return to the area of the crash and carry out a search. I nor anybody else knows if the remains discovered by qattara and his team are those of Dennis Copping. It may turn out to be unrelated we just don’t know and that is the point We don’t know and we have an obligation to find out. i for one hope they are his remains because if they aren’t any evidence at the crash site has by now been obliterated and the chances of being able to organise and fund a search are remote. There was great deal of interest expressed in documenting the recovery and coordinating an investigation and search of the area around the crash site. All of which would have been funded by the documentary team this was communicated to the RAFM at the highest level and the MOD. The chances of discovering Dennis Coppings’ remains would still have been remote but at least we could have tried. You say it has nothing to do with me well the last time i checked the RAFM was a national collection that means it belongs to all of us. The sacrifices made by Dennis Copping and his family were made for all of us too and that makes it all of our business. Does it have nothing to with the family, because no one has bothered to tell them anything either? PM sent by the way!

    in reply to: P40 thread #1051534
    pat1968
    Participant

    As I said at the beginning, it is removed pending developments. It would not have been done without good reason I can assure you. It will return!

    I do think comparing removing a thread on an internet forum with the invasion of Poland is pushing similes a little far!

    Bruce

    I haven’t compared the invasion of Poland with your removal of the thread. I have clearly suggested that the removal is censorship. I have compared your statement that the removal is not censorship as being a bit like describing the invasion of Poland as a Holiday.

    This forum has seen wild speculation (including that of the possible identity of the pilot), long before the aircraft was positively identified and the family informed, despite being cautioned that this should not happen and the feelings of the family should be respected. There has been a clamour to broadcast the information across the world in the misguided assumption that this would somehow help protect the aircraft and facilitate a speedy recovery, which has taken place, I believe prompted by a forumite, again before the family were informed. They actually found out when someone read it in a newspaper and called them. It has been debated whether it is worth searching for the remains of the pilot ad-nauseum, many (not all) drawing the conclusion that as it is difficult and unlikely that his remains may be found, it is not worth even trying, thus absolving all of our consciences of the responsibility. Thank goodness Flt Sgt Copping and his comrades didn’t draw this conclusion 70 years ago when faced with even more seemingly insurmountable and dangerous tasks, their likelihood of success was also small but thankfully they didn’t draw the conclusion that it was so difficult they shouldn’t bother!

    There are things that are more important than the recovery of historic aircraft even one as important as this. Qattara and his team are the only people on this forum (as far as I am aware) who have been on the ground in the area of the crash and despite their considerable efforts and their discovery of human remains in the vicinity of the aircraft and passing all of the relevant information to the UK authorities no one from the MOD has even bothered to contact them. Frankly that is a disgrace and we should all be ashamed at the total lack of interest that has been shown by officialdom in recovering the remains of Flt Sgt Copping. The debt we owe him and his family is immeasurable and the effort required now to attempt to identify and recover his remains and show him the respect and dignity he deserves is a miniscule sacrifice in comparison. In the mean time a recovery of sorts has taken place and the aircraft and the slightly bizarre efforts to recover it seems to be in limbo. I believe this censorship sorry ‘brief interlude’ is more about covering the embarrassment of the people who have clamoured to recover the aircraft without a second thought for the recovery of the pilot, a recovery effort that looks increasingly like it was ill conceived and doomed to fail. In any event I fail to see how comments on this forum can conceivably influence the outcome of those efforts good, bad or indifferent.

    Despite the numerous negatives, this thread was also being used as a means of exchanging information between parties who are still trying to identify those remains with, hopefully, a positive outcome for Flt Sgt Dennis Copping and his family. Parties like Qattara, L garey, Tangmere myself and others. The suspension of this thread is certainly not helping that particular cause. So in the absence of any evidence or explanation to the contrary as to why we are experiencing this brief interlude, I stick by my earlier assertion that this is censorship pure and simple and for all the wrong reasons. Reopen the thread. Freedom of speech is the cornerstone of democracy, at least what we have left of it. We should all now concern ourselves with trying to help where we can to do the right thing and identify, if possible, and facilitate the recovery of the remains of the most important person in this whole affair, Flt Sgt Dennis Copping.

    in reply to: P40 thread #1052271
    pat1968
    Participant

    It isnt censorship; just a brief interlude.

    I suppose the nazi invasion of Poland was summer holiday? what is the purpose of the ‘brief interlude’?

    in reply to: P40 thread #1052485
    pat1968
    Participant

    I thought censorship was something people like Dennis Copping were fighting to prevent?

    pat1968
    Participant

    Lest us hope that all these young men can be found and given due respect they should have.
    Thank you Andy.

    I couldn’t have put it better myself!

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 224 total)