dark light

pat1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 224 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Boston Crew finally laid to rest (merged) #1012351
    pat1968
    Participant

    Boston Crew finally laid to rest

    An RAF Boston crew have finally been laid to rest in Italy. Well done all involved!
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23343677

    in reply to: Rolls Royce Kestrel V #952377
    pat1968
    Participant

    Hi there I have a kestrel V overhaul manual and and also a running and maintenance. Send me a pm and let me know what you need.
    best wishes Pat

    in reply to: P40 Dennis Copping #965635
    pat1968
    Participant

    Not claiming to be an expert of any sort at all, but I have had a (rare) thought with regards to the gear being up or down when the aircraft came down. Being as the under carriage fold backwards up into the underside of the wings on a P40, is there no way the impact of the wheels in the soft sand at a higher speed could have folded the gear back up into the retracted position? Not being a real nut in the field, I guess there is some sort of locking mechanism which would prevent this? Think I have just answered my own query! what a doughnut…

    I think this is a possible scenario, although like you I am no expert. If i remember correctly the aircraft had a damaged undercarriage as the result of a heavy landing into the sun the previous evening. For the ferry flight the undercarriage was left down. I do not know if this was a precaution or necessity. I suspect a precaution as I doubt the aircraft was jacked up in the field. From memory one of the gear legs was detached and was lying some distance behind the aircraft one of the wheels having been broken in half. The other undercarriage leg was still in it’s well. I doubt that the gear leg would have been ripped out of its well, although this is possible. Another scenario is that when a forced landing became inevitable or as a means of preserving fuel, the gear was selected up. Possibly due to the damage sustained in the heavy landing one gear retracted and one stayed extended. I am not an expert on the P40 hydraulics but i believe it is open circuit so this should be possible? That would mean on landing the extended gear would be ripped off also i would imagine tipping the aircraft onto its nose hence the loss of the sump and subsequent fire, although this could have occurred in flight and caused the fire. No fuel no fire! The retracted leg would be relatively undamaged as found.
    The seat distortion if caused by the seat strap would have excerpted a very large downward force on the shoulder potentially causing quite serious injury in that area. Also if the straps detached the risk of serious head injury is increased significantly.
    I think what this debate highlights is that much information on the possible whereabouts of Dennis Copping could and should have been gleaned from the crash sight. This in turn could make a very real difference in the search for his remains. If this has been done then who has this information? No one seems to be forthcoming with any information in the UK all seemingly being lost in a fog of misinformation. In the meantime apparently Mr Manna is giving public speeches on the subject to audiences in USA. All very unsatisfactory!

    in reply to: P40 Dennis Copping #968069
    pat1968
    Participant

    I am sure I’ll be shot for saying this but I feel I have to ask…

    Why do people feel so strongly that his body has to be found at all cost and brought home? His family must surely have accepted by now that the poor chap is long dead. They will have surely moved on with their lives decades ago, and the public had no concern for him at all during the 70 years between his crash and the discovery of his aircraft.

    His Mother, Brother and sister did all move on with their lives and accept the fact that he was dead. They never forgot him and they always held out hope that one day his body might be found and given a decent burial and they would finally know the truth about what happened to him. His surviving family would like to do that if at all possible. The public cannot be concerned with what they don’t know about as you say he was one of many lost. I am not aware that anybody has said his body should be found at all cost just if at all possible, i am not sure that, that is too much to ask?

    Negating that it’s pretty much an impossibility to actually locate his remains now, finding his body at huge effort and expense just so he can be reburied and eventually forgotten in a cemetery – why?

    These are all sweeping assumptions. How do you know it is pretty much impossible? How do you know it will require a huge effort and expense? Why do you assume he will be forgotten? He has not been in a cemetery for the last 70 years and he has not been forgotten so why would he be forgotten now? Most of the people who knew him personally are dead, not all but most and he is still very much not forgotten.

    There are, after all, thousands of New Zealanders who died for the British Empire who’ve never been brought home. And tens of thousands of others also either missing, or lying in foreign cemeteries. Why the desire for so much effort for one person now? I really do not get it. And many of those advocating this search are the same people who’re so protective of war graves being untouched so the remains are not disturbed. A bit odd.

    These efforts should not be just be expended on one person, i for one am grateful to have lived in relative peace and freedom all of my life and i appreciate that without the sacrifices made by ordinary people and their families that could have been very different. I personally believe that the effort and expense required to give these people a decent burial when possible is a small price to pay for the debt that we owe them.

    Surely the recovery of his aircraft and placing it on public display will mean his memory and his story will be kept alive in a far better way for generations to come as people pass through the museum that it is displayed in. There will not be a steady stream of people visiting his grave in decades to come, but in a place like the RAF Museum his story of why he fought and how and why he died can be told and retold for centuries to come.

    Why do you assume that he will be forgotten in years to come? People visit military cemeteries all over the world to pay respects to family members and to strangers that they have never met, a century after they died. Why do you assume that will not continue? Yes the aircraft in which he flew could well be a lasting memorial to his memory and should in what ever form that maybe. What you seem to lose sight of is the fact that the aircraft would not be important at all if it were not for the people who designed it, built it, flew and maintained it in the most difficult and dangerous of circumstances and in this case possibly died in it. I have for years now heard people calling the spitfire a legend. I am not going to say that it isn’t, but if it is it is because of the people who made it and fought and died in it. Without those people it would just be another aeroplane and we should not forget that. This particular aircraft is no different. That is the whole point we should not forget these people or their families and when we have an opportunity bring some closure to one family we should take it if possible. It may not be possible, it may be difficult but that does not mean we should not try. We waste epic amounts of money in this country so the relatively trifling amount that would be need to make a modest effort to find his remains is small change in the grand scheme of things. If it was handled in the right way it could actually be a very positive exercise for Britain and Egypt also.

    in reply to: P40 Dennis Copping #970931
    pat1968
    Participant

    Dko, we may not accept this sorry state of affairs easily, however, as Andy pointed out above, from Egyptians point of view we also may shove our “moral obligations” up our… ehm… known locations. The Egyptians have much more serious problems over their heads now and, in the end, their good will (or lack thereof) is going to be THE most important factor in any attempts to bring the plane and pilot remainings home.

    Whilst I fully accept that Egyptian government clearly has some serious issues to deal with. Why do you assume that there is no goodwill extended either to the UK government or to this particular issue? I have not seen or heard anything that would lead me to believe that anyone in Egypt has been uncooperative. If that is the case I would be frankly surprised as in the grand scheme of things, as you have quite rightly pointed out this would seem like a very simple way to promote good relations between our two countries? Given our past history in relation to the people of Egypt I think they are a extremely magnanimous people! I am afraid whilst this is a valid point it is yet another attempt to mitigate the complete lack of action by the British government. As I stated above any mitigation is valueless if no action is taken.

    in reply to: P40 Dennis Copping #972125
    pat1968
    Participant

    Indeed – but one has to ask what would have been the case had the crews of either of those aircraft not been so easily found? How much time would have been spent looking?

    The crew of the lady be good were not all found during the extensive search. Several were found by accident by british oil workers. One of the crew has never been positively identified but it is likely that a body discovered some distance away was his although this has never been positively established as far as I know.
    I don’t think anyone has ever said recovering the P40 was not a good thing quite the opposite. However many people including myself find.it difficult to understand why apparently little or no effort has been expended on trying to recover Dennis Copping? I don’t believe that pointing out the fact that it may be difficult is really mitigation. If no effort is expended then the difficulty or likelihood of success are irrelevant?
    At the risk of repeating myself I fully support the recovery of the aircraft and I hope that the efforts expended on that are successful. However I do feel that Dennis Copping should not be forgotten and given that a not inconsiderable amount of effort and money has been expended on this cause it would not have been too difficult, time consuming or expensive to go the extra mile or in this five miles or so.

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #997147
    pat1968
    Participant

    where to start?
    With regards to the Italian search I have no more information than anyone else on the forum, except the Italian team themselves. I have to say I agree with David, i suggested that I/we don’t have the full picture, i.e. I have not visited the area in question, i don’t know what the rational for the search was and i have no idea what intelligence was available to the search team prior to commencing the search. Without any of this information it is difficult to draw any meaningful conclusions regarding the search. I have to say, as many already have, on the face of it, it seems to be an amazing find akin to finding a needle in a thousand haystacks. However without having the background information available to the search team i would reserve judgement.
    I also agree with Bruce, the bones found by the Italians need to be tested and as soon as is practical. The family have been fed misinformation so many times now it is beyond ridiculous. I have no information available to me that would confirm that the location of the bones has been passed on to the authorities, if anyone from ARIDO would care to confirm this it would be helpful. I have been told that this has taken place, however we have been told that the MOD have had no contact with the Italians. The latest information that I have is that an expedition is planned for later in the year when the temperatures are cooler. I will certainly pose the question of who has been informed of the location of the bones as i think it warrants an answer. As Laurence and others have stated on a number of occasions this is a relatively simple process made seemingly next to impossible! In the meantime Dennis Coppings’ family have no answers. This sorry saga seems to be never ending!

    in reply to: Hawker Typhoon parts. #935560
    pat1968
    Participant

    It was a great privilege to be involved in collecting the fuselage, not to mention great fun. Thank you DaveR for inviting us! Everyone in Holland was as usually extremely hospitable especially Fort Veldhuis (Fieldhouse), which as Dave says is a mine of information and well worth a visit. We will definitely return! The effort that is put in by everyone at the museum to identify aircraft and crews puts our government to shame! Some of the stories that they have uncovered are extraordinary. They deserve all of our support. Long may it continue!
    This is a really exciting development for any Typhoon fan (That’s everyone isn’t it?;)) The prospect of another Typhoon with a legitimate identity is worthy cause indeed. I look forward to helping in anyway that i can, So dig out all those drawings!

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #939268
    pat1968
    Participant

    If I recall from previous threads, the bones had not been discovered when the aircraft was recovered. I also would not call 8kilometers a very short distance. As a search radius, that’s over 200 million square metres – a very fortunate find by quatara in such a short time

    You recall incorrectly, the bones were discovered before the aircraft was recovered. 8 kilometres is not a great distance from one known point to another known point, especially when you have travelled hundreds of miles from Cairo to recover the aircraft. The Embassy didn’t know the location of the remains discovered by the Italians because they didn’t ask for them.

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #939270
    pat1968
    Participant

    I’ve followed this thread with interest from the start. While the apparent slowness of the MOD and lack of action on the ground in Egypt seems to be the main, apparent, problem let’s consider the situation. Remains have been found and, thankfully, concealed and preserved for future recovery. However, we must bear in mind the current geo-political situation. Egypt has considerable problems with internal unrest, the North African region has seen turbulent times with westerners being targeted. You can be certain that the Egyptian authorities have more pressing commitments than to provide armed escort and safe passage for a recovery team – and they certainly would not countenance the prescence of an armed military expedition of a foreign power. While our good friend qattra has done so much to record and preserve what there is there must be an element of personal risk even in such a remote location once their continued presence is known. Perhaps that is why things are taking so long, to keep people away from the site and perceived dangers. Would we really expect the authorities to authorise an unprotected recovery and then take the flak if things went wrong. I, as much as you all, wish to see closure on this for the sake of Sgt Copping and his family but feel that we will just have to wait this out patiently.

    All expeditions into the desert require a permit and are escorted. Usually by licences guides. Tourists are still visiting the area in question and have done so throughout the recent events in Egypt. I am only aware of one incident of western tourists being kidnapped in Egypt and this was in the sinai, an area known to be lawless long before the recent political upheaval. The p40 recovery was attended by the defence attaché from the UK embassy in Cairo, clearly he was not too busy to attend the recovery of the aircraft but now apparently the embassy are too busy to recover the pilot? There has already been an officially sanctioned expedition into the desert. It is nothing like as dangerous as it is ‘perceived’ save for the risk of dehydration! Anyone can organise this kind of trip into the desert.

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #940870
    pat1968
    Participant

    This is very interesting and good of them to look but with a resolution only capable of viewing objects larger than eighteen inches it was always unlikely that any evidence of the movements or whereabouts of the pilot would be found. There are certainly satellite systems that are capable of a much greater resolution but unfortunately the likes of you and I are not likely to have access to them. If the remains discovered by the are not those of Dennis Copping then i think the only way he will be found will be by an organised search on the ground or by accident in the same way that his aircraft was found. Either way we should do what we can to find him, positively identify him and give him a decent burial.

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #949194
    pat1968
    Participant

    So if i have understood correctly the MOD have told the Family that the bones discovered by the Italians have been deemed “unsuitable for DNA analysis”. Like most people (and the family!) I assumed that this meant the bones had been recovered to a laboratory and an unsuccessful attempt made to extract DNA. Now it transpires that in fact no one has either asked for or been given the location of the remains, making it highly unlikely that they have actually been recovered. So despite the fact that a fragment of parachute was discovered at that location it may well be that the decision has been made not to recover or test the remains as there is not enough circumstantial evidence that they are those of Dennis Copping?
    If this is the case this is simply unacceptable, to quote a member of Dennis Coppings’ family “they found a fragment of parachute with the bones what more do they need?”
    I find this whole situation extraordinary!

    in reply to: A-1 Skyraider – How it got it Sandy name #953110
    pat1968
    Participant

    Did they? Think a few “invented” the concept of a flying machine before the Wright Brothers…

    And even they may have been beaten by a German!

    I think we are getting into serious thread drift. However, your argument could include leonardo da Vinci, but I think that would be a little disingenuous! Even the recent furore over who did infact make the first powered heavier than air flight points to another American. So I will still maintain my assertion that they (the Americans) invented this particular contraption. “and all your piety and wit will not change a word of it”.

    in reply to: A-1 Skyraider – How it got it Sandy name #953980
    pat1968
    Participant

    Well they did invent the contraption, I think they can probably call it whatever they like. Even if they don’t know how to spell it!

    in reply to: A-1 Skyraider – How it got it Sandy name #954101
    pat1968
    Participant

    If it is an acronym, and I’m not convinced (yet) surely it would be sande Search AND DEstroy?
    I have a friend who used to fly interference in an OH6. He was shot down three times, he will know I am sure.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 224 total)