Hi All,
Sopwith,
The news item I found was the only recent story I could find, I have searched the past story’s in the Orcadian that was mentioned earlier with no luck and I am awaiting a reply to my e-mail. As stated the linked Daily Record story was posted as a matter of interest. I assumed the main story that was taken down is about a find on land with the bottom link to twitter possibly having some association with that story as this will be published in the Nov issue of Britain At War. ? other than that it is only a wild guess that the two are possibly linked. :confused:
Geoff.
Hi All,
David,
I only assumed incorrectly the number of RAF personnel was at least 75’000, Also it was just used as an example of how the money could be raised not a definite suggestion as you seem to think it was. To put it another way then there must be at least 75’000 EX-RAF Personnel that could donate a £1 problem solved ??
I suppose at the end of the day it comes down to weather or not people can be bothered with a donation of a £1 and being pedantic here 40’000 RAF Personnel, I will throw the question back to you then:- ‘Why wouldn’t any RAF personnel donate £2 out of their monthly that would raise £80’000’ after all I assume like myself when I enlisted it had something to do with the love of aviation as well as a career ? Also who as an ex-serviceman would not want to donate to a worthy cause,
you are of coarse correct their are Phantoms preserved but none in a live condition let alone a Spey engine Phantom.
I will even go so far as to ask why when we can afford to donate to the replacement engine on a visiting Lancaster can we not also donate to retaining a phantom in live condition run by what are largely a volunteer group keeping our aviation jet heritage in a live condition.
Geoff.
Hi All,
Here’s another older news item if anyone’s interested. http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/world-war-secrets-revealed–3965757
I also suspect the link below may have something to do with the whole story being pulled. :confused:
https://twitter.com/LoveArchaeology/status/505666907136327680
Geoff.
Hi All,
Donation done! :eagerness:
Geoff.
Hi All,
I have just returned to the Black Mike fund raising page and I will be the first to admit I have been on the fence waiting but have now decided to donate, I am just amazed that the campaign seems to have stalled as far as donations have gone ? Only 86 donations very sad when you consider just as an example, If all the RAF personnel donated a pound it’s a done deal Black Mike saved at Bruntingthorpe with extra cash for the team that would run her :eagerness:
Follow the link to see for yourself how poorly things are going. :confused:
https://www.gofundme.com/Save-Black-Mike/donate
Geoff.
Hi All,
Moogy,
I am sorry but I do not understand why you would still need a brief to plead guilty and accept the punishment ? I assume it’s not a legal requirement to have a brief when pleading guilt is it ? Please advise not being legally minded in the process of the law courts it would come in handy for future reference if needed :eagerness:
Geoff
Hi All,
Paul,
Don’t know about bacon but I ad a sausage sandwich earlier! :highly_amused: Just glad Sue still feeds me to be honest! 😀
Snafu,
I found this on wiki and the last paragraph seems to fit your honourable questioning ?
P A K I acquired offensive connotations in the 1960s when used by British tabloids to refer to subjects of former colony states in a derogatory and racist manner. In modern British usage P A K I is typically a derogatory label used for all South Asians, including Indians, Afghans and Bangladeshis. To a lesser extent, it has also been applied to Arabs and others perceived to resemble South Asians. During the 60’s many emigrants were also dubbed as “black” to further segregate them from the white community. Some would say such a division still exists in parts of England.
In recent times there has been a trend by second and third-generation British Pakistanis to reclaim the word, so that it can be used between young British Pakistanis, but not by outsiders, even Indians and Bangladeshis.
As for the others you mentioned they are all slang for the various peoples from counties over the world. Just to throw the cat amongst the pigeons here 😀 Although the term WOG has the same connotations as P A K I it is actually a shortened version of Westernised Oriental Gentleman.
Geoff.
Hi All,
I am sorry Moggy but I have to agree with Charlie. One question though if you knew you had been speeding why the need for a brief why not be honest and plead guilty to the charge ?
Geoff.
Charlie,
Please could you PM your e-mail address being as you do not accept PM’s from other members.:eagerness:
Paul,
No I never I’ll have to ask the wife to watch for that. Maybe that’s why the wife gives me my tea with the same hand. :highly_amused:
Geoff.
Hi All,
If you like P-38’s you’ll love this not quite as low but a different angle all the same. :eagerness:
And this still reckon it is one of the best post by another member a while back if I am not mistaken by Skyraider3D.:love-struck:
Geoff.
Hi All,
From one to two in Jeddah 😀

Geoff.
Hi All,
Charlie,
Your spot on again matey, I don’t know if what I recall is correct but I think it was called AI-F1 design type of cars racing, but they had the right Idea all raced the same type of car with the same engine (please correct if I am wrong) I think it may have possibly involved a team from so many countries rather than a select few like F1. :confused:
I mean I think it’s got to a point in the WSB ? one category for the top elite if you like then another category for a lower class (Pleas correct if wrong)
Geoff.
Hi All,
Charlie unlike his cricket you are dead on! :highly_amused:
Geoff.
Hi All,
You are quite correct about the sausages but the Pakistani-PaIci for short! Before anybody calls racist I refer to Aussie short for Australian,Brit for British
and if a Chinaman is from China,Irish from Ireland why the hell can’t we say a P A K I is from Pakistan without it being termed as racist ?
As for being Rapists What in this country ? No way they are all good god fearing people and would never do such a thing 😮 Although correct me if I am wrong the Muslim male believe that they can take a woman after she menstruates for the first time as the girl has become according to the Koran a Woman ?
even though she is under age and legally in this country and still a child.
I remember the then leader of EDL (Not My Favourite Party or any similar!) Tommy Robinson in the centre of Luton during a documentary about him, Asking Muslim men when they collard him about his views of the Muslim faith and his involvement with EDL, he shot back with questions but the one that got the best reaction was what was stated above about Raping kids is o.k. in their faith, they backed off and wouldn’t say anything other than threaten him :confused: So much for a peace loving faith. Yet according to most Muslims,we the so called infidel are the unclean because we eat pork.
Geoff.
Hi All,
Well here is some well needed good news about Mr Cundall and the Claridon Groups involvement, Straight from the Horses mouth and you cannot get much better than a certain Mr Chris Scott (Group President!) I e-mailed the group for an update on the situation regarding their involvement and the following two e-mails should make their position perfectly clear!
No.1.
Dear Geoffrey,
Thank you for your mail.
Yes we are still backing David Cundall and completely committed to help him find the Spitfires and bring them back to the UK.
All the best
Chris Scott
No.2 – After asking permission to post the reply’s on this forum.
Dear Geoffrey,
Thank you for your mail & kind words and you are welcome and please feel free to post this on the aviation forum. As I mentioned earlier, we will be doing everything possible to help David find the Spitfires and bring them back to where they belong. I was with David in Yangon about a month ago and there are a lot of developments going on at the moment which I can’t speak about, but all positive. We are aware of the negative comments that are out there and the ridicule both David and Claridon have had – can’t quite understand how these individuals want the project to fail.
All the best
Chris
Reg. Office Claridon Group Ltd., Claridon House, London Road, Stanford-Le-Hope, Essex SS17 0JU. Registered in England No.2301476.
All business is transacted in accordance with BIFA standard trading conditions 2005 edition (British International Freight Association).
Like I said in the now locked other Burma thread why don’t the naysayers just give Mr Cundall a break, It has not been proved categorically either way about these elusive buried Spitfires! If their proves to be any buried Spitfires then we should all give a well earned pat on the back to both to Mr Cundall and the Claridon Group for their continued support of Mr Cundalls project, if on the other hand it proves to be there are none found still give them both a pat on the back and say better luck next time. :eagerness:
Geoff