dark light

Tin Triangle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 706 through 720 (of 1,108 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Very sad news, RIP

    in reply to: Canada's second Live Lancaster #965505
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    What an achievement! The whole team deserves a major pat on the back.
    It might be worth linking to this photo to emphasise how far this Lancaster has come!
    http://www.abpic.co.uk/photo/1361979/

    in reply to: Jet Age Museum opens at Staverton #966435
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    It’s great to see this project finally come to fruition,especially seeing another Javelin and two more Meteors in a snug building away from the elements!

    in reply to: Whitley wing move dates – Norwich to Tilbury #966439
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    I should be OK for Saturday 7th, at least in the morning.

    in reply to: Whitley wing move dates – Norwich to Tilbury #968471
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Elliott,

    Just to check you’re still doing this on Saturday? If you could let the helpers know times, location etc that’d be great.
    Cheers!

    in reply to: Whitley Parts #970241
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Ditto!

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #986786
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Finnish???!!

    Well, I was fooled for a moment!
    There are blue RAF roundels on the top wings peeking over the leading edges though!!!

    in reply to: Whitley wing move dates – Norwich to Tilbury #989153
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Both dates are OK for me to help at the Norwich end (1st would be slightly better). Ms. Tin Triangle may also come and lend a hand!

    in reply to: RAFM Wellington #990425
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    To me the question of how aircraft should be displayed depends very much on the story the museum is trying to tell, but also related to how many other survivors of the type exist.

    We are lucky enough to have a great number of surviving Supermarine Spitfires comprising the vast majority of marks and models, including many with interesting combat histories. So it’s very encouraging and fascinating to see these wonderful machines restored in a huge variety of appropriate colour schemes, with many owners going to great lengths to restore their aircraft (both static and airworthy) back to their original, historically accurate specifications.
    But just imagine a hypothetical alternative reality where only two Spitfires survive, and (simply by virtue of numbers built) these comprise a Mk. IX and Mk. V, neither with interesting combat histories, and both of which have been substantially restored since their wartime service. Now we have a different situation, because for many people the Spitfire is synonymous with the Battle of Britain. There would be an enormous temptation to paint at least one of the survivors in a Battle of Britain scheme, even though it is totally inappropriate for that aircraft. Why? Because the Spitfire’s association with the Battle of Britain in particular is such an important story that it deserves to be told, even if it comes at the cost of presenting the artefact in a more accurate, but less historically interesting colour scheme: because there are so few survivors in this case it’s more important to use them to tell the most historically significant story.

    So getting back to the Wellington, I think that with just two survivors, it is important to use the Hendon Wellington to tell the most important story the Wellington was involved in: the early war bombing raids on German cities. Sure, it’s a late version with Hercules engines and doesn’t actually look much like a 1940-era Wellington Ic, but nonetheless, configured as a bomber, and painted in a representative scheme (or even as an OTU aircraft-this is a really nice idea) it’s going to tell the story of those inefficient, dangerous and unsung early bombing missions much better than if it was painted silver with yellow bands.

    Sure, if you had ten surviving Wellingtons I’d say paint one as a trainer, but at the end of the day a major aim of a museum should be to tell a story with its artefacts, and leave the viewer with a better understanding of history. Leave it as it is.

    in reply to: Starfighter resurrection…assembly begins #990428
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Roll Out ceremony August 17th…see our website under “What’s Happening” for details…it will be a big event

    Tom

    This is a great endeavour, and I hope the roll-out goes well. Looking forward to seeing some pictures when it’s complete and painted!

    in reply to: Mosquito from the cockpit video, what a view! #997684
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Super video, thanks.
    There’s one point early on where the Lanc just drifts into the Mosquito’s gunsight… and in my mind instantly morphs into a He-177 or Ju-88! I was just willing the pilot to pull the trigger!

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary #997830
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Has the Javelin got its engines installed? Can’t help thinking that’s be a hell of a taxying project once that Hunter is done and shiny! 😛
    But seriously, good to see another aircraft at the Museum coming alive, and of course Lindy still looks the business!

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #998389
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Well, if SNAFU’s gone for good I hope TFC will find a worthy replacement. It’s a shame that the UK can’t seem to keep hold of an airworthy P-47, but we should be glad we got to see her while she was here.

    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    I’d be happy to supply some brawn at the Norwich end if it’s before mid-September.

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #1000236
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Odd. The crew on 808 whom I met at Waddington were convinced that this was the aircraft going to Cosford!

Viewing 15 posts - 706 through 720 (of 1,108 total)