dark light

Tin Triangle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,108 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fairey Barracuda DP872 #1001565
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    I personally think that the most satisfactory outcome is to have one, complete, composite Barracuda in the FAAM which is as original as possible, as a memorial to all the crews who flew the type and didn’t live to tell the tale. I’m sure the guys who died in DP872, DR306 and LS931 would all be absolutely chuffed that a dedicated and skillful team is resurrecting a Barracuda from bits of “their” aircraft to remember their sacrifices by! It would be quite possible for the completed aircraft to be accompanied by a plaque or other memorial commemorating the three crews equally.

    So in that sense, I for one don’t think it matters which of those three identities is used: to me it simply ought to be the one from which the majority of material is drawn.

    in reply to: Spotted 2013 #1002806
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    T-6 back again over Norwich heading S, got a better view this, time, appeared to be an SNJ in USN markings.

    in reply to: Chatham Islands Sunderland being pieced together #1002982
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Amazing! That’s a project to make the French Lancaster restoration look like a piece of cake. Great to hear that another Sunderland survives!

    in reply to: Spotted 2013 #1002983
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Harvard over central Norwich, headed SE about an hour ago.

    in reply to: Surviving Miles aircraft #1003675
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    J Boyle:

    The Wetaskiwin Whitney Straight was there to 2008 at least…
    http://www.abpic.co.uk/search.php?q=CF-FGK&u=reg

    in reply to: Surviving Miles aircraft #1003679
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    I probably missed it, but has anybody mentioned the Martinet slowly being pieced back together at Woodley, recovered as a crashed civil target tug in Iceland?

    in reply to: Vulcan Main Undercarriage Doors #1006391
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    In the case of the Cosford example, maybe they kept them closed to repel nesting birds, and as Paul says simply forgot to lower them?

    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Get well soon!

    in reply to: Fairey Barracuda DP872 #1007678
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Bluebird Mike didn’t mention that the July diary is now on the Barra website…
    http://barracudaproject.co.uk/index.php?id=23

    Great work guys, that tailplane is starting to come together. I for one am going to be following this avidly, it’s really great to see such an enthusiastic, witty and inventive team getting stuck into ressurecting an extinct type. Keep it up! 😀

    in reply to: Heads up, "the plane that saved Britain". #1008434
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    I thought it was pretty good, and I for one can forgive it the tendency to stray into hyperbole-as Sopwith said it’s aimed at enthusing and interesting Joe public, and does a good job.
    For me the inclusion of the RR299 footage, which I had not seen, was very poignant and chilling-and an unusually brave step. However, using it to cast doubt the current pilot’s ability seemed pretty unnecessary.
    I agree about the slightly rough treatment given to DHAM and Avspecs-in each case a half-sentence more narration would have given a bit more balance.
    Nice to see some unusual archive footage: I’ve never seen the newsreel of the Amiens raid, let alone footage of Sea Mosquitoes landing on carriers. I was amused, however, to see the Douglas Boston getting so much airplay-It doesn’t look that similar!

    Overall, not bad. And Kudos to C4 for choice of Arthur Williams. In this day and age disability should not be any barrier at all to someone with such a likeable personality, good camera manner and obvious passion for his subject-but I bet it’s still bl–dy hard to make your way as a presenter if you’re in a wheelchair.

    in reply to: Canberra PR9 XH134 flies again #1010788
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Great! Looking forward to seeing it on the airshow circuit soon 🙂

    in reply to: The Most Pretty Combat Aircraft in Your Eyes #1012010
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Prototype/Early B.1 Vulcan
    Victor B.1
    Baby Spit (naturally)
    Hawker Fury
    Supermarine Scimitar
    F-101 two-seat variants
    Two-seat Jaguar
    Mirage IV
    FW-200 Condor
    Vega Gull (OK, not a “combat aircraft”)

    I also have a real soft spot for the Gladiator. Not everyone’s idea of beauty but to me it just looks “right”.

    in reply to: RNZAF Museum P40 #1012167
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Wow, I’d no idea it had advanced that much!
    The “restorations” section of the RNZAFM website is decidedly out of date.
    Great to see it done, and I look forward to seeing some more of their projects move along (especially the Vildebeest)

    in reply to: Red Arrows Hawk replacements #1013242
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Back to the OP’s question, surely if the rest of the RAF will get the Hawk T.2 when the T.1 is retired, does it not follow that the Reds will follow suit? It would make the kind of airframe rotation described earlier much easier if both the Reds and the main RAF continued to operate the same type.

    in reply to: 109E Projects, current status #934100
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Mark12, thanks for posting.
    That’s a superb restoration, shame (in some ways) that it’s going abroad-while the Germans of course have every right to fly their heritage, it would be nice to have at least one genuine Bf109 on the UK circuit!
    Can anybody help with history etc of Werk Nr.1983? Is this an Eastern Front recovery?

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,108 total)