WS10B in mass production, the shown engine with gearbox at the bottom, which is designed to power J10B fighter. The B version of WS10 turbofan is said to have 13.2 ton max thrust.

There are several wrapped engines on the floor as well.

CZ-11W

from JDW ( 19-Oct,2011 posted)

October 14, 2011 Defense Minister Arturo Purichelli Argentina and vice-president of China Foreign Trade Association China Aviation Technology Import Export Corporation (CATIC, the export structure of Aircraft Corporation AVIC) Wu Jia Jia signed an agreement to build the organization on the Argentine national aircraft building enterprise Fábrica Argentina de Aviones “Brigadier San Martín “(FAdeA) in Cordoba, Chinese light helicopters CZ-11W. Signing of the agreement took place during a ceremony honoring the 84th anniversary of the Argentine aircraft factory.

And according to this site:

http://desarrolloydefensa.blogspot.com/2011/10/catic-el-nuevo-socio-estrategico-de.html

It’s potential for Catic to supply other types of aircraft for Argentine AF.

The right canard deflected so much compared to left one, a stun scene. Haha, ask a striker to do it the same.

…Personaly I don’t care about what media “experts” write.(I remember one of those experts write that China have intercontinental anti-ship missile).

Impressive, yanks invented ASBM & I just learned Russians have upgraded it to intercontinental 😉

What a wonderful “fan”land.:D

Nothing beats the Sino-russia trade to tell who is overall dominant in the industrial area if someone really wants to measure up.

Russia is still the resource centric exporter for China, while China, from where Russia imports the most, counts machinery & electronics as the lion’s share for its export to Russia.

The first 2 months of this year sees bilateral trade of machinery/electronics between China & Russia stands at 2.38 billion, in which 2.33 billion is export from China, Russia merely exported 50 million worth of high end product, not deniable substantial share of that 50 million could be military related. But consider such a tiny amount to a trade n industrial giant like China, it’s really not worth of giving a d*mn glance, no matter what fanboy is yawning how big he is. 😀 see below figure, which speaks itself.

Bilateral trade in machinery and electronics may touch $30b, says China Chamber of Commerce

BEIJING – Sino-Russian trade in machinery and electronic products is expected to reach $30 billion by 2015, said Zhang Yujing, president of China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products (CCCME), on Tuesday.

He also said the total bilateral trade volume is expected to stand at $100 billion by 2015.

China is the world’s largest exporter and the second-largest importer of machinery and electronic products. Trade in these products constitutes the major part of bilateral trade between the two countries.

In 2010, China’s exports of electronic products to Russia jumped by 85.1 percent year-on-year to $13.5 billion, accounting for 45.6 percent of the country’s total exports to Russia.

Zhang also said Russia’s resource-centered economy is benefiting from increased demand and the rise in the prices of commodities such as crude oil, natural gas and coal, following the economic recovery from the global financial crisis.

Propelled by the price hikes of natural resources, Russian companies will expand their production capability and seek overseas investments, Zhang said.

“This will create great opportunities for further increases in bilateral trade and cooperation (in machinery and electronic products),” he said.

During the first two months of this year, bilateral trade between the two countries in machinery and electronic products surged by 56.7 percent year-on-year to $2.38 billion, according to the General Administration of Customs.

Meanwhile, China’s exports of electronics and machinery to Russia amounted to $2.33 billion, compared with imports of $50 million, official figures showed.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2011-04/13/content_12318914.htm

It’s Oct first, u know what day it is &the Sac’s new stealthy bird going to fly on this day.

Of course J20 in current stage is clawless , is geared for future just as PAk-FA. While Su47 is solely for demo and became history already. I guess human does got intelligent to figure out the difference, do u ?

Nonsense, a tech demo is meant precisely to demonstrate the ability to build a technology for production (and it’s not like the J-20 is deployed already). BTW, the s-duct intake is arguably one of the Su-47 technologies that worked brilliantly, despite having practically no moving parts it allowed an engine like the D-30F6 to be manoeuvred hard and flown at high AoA. Like the US TF30 or UK Spey, it’s a first-generation afterburning turbofan that was designed for a non-fighter application, flying it the way it was in the Su-47 should have been asking for trouble.

So has ur argument changed things a little bit? Has the Su47 been ever induced so as to justify “demonstrate the ability to build a technology for production”. LOL, a Tech demo never ended in production but still can claim ”demonstrate …for production” how ridiculous.

Again, the key point is not how successful the Su47 is integrated with S duct. The Su47 is a mere tech demo, and already thrown into history bin. How successful or not is immaterial as Su47 doesn’t justify the argument that PAK-FA, has an induced predecessor that features S-duct. So it doesn’t justify that PAK-FA adopts a radar blocker over S-duct is an evolvement from the predecessor as someone tries to imply.

However, the key point is Yanks after adopting the radar blocker in their 1st gen stealthy, formally induced fighters like F117 and various other fighters with stealthy features, their latest stealthy fighters all adopt the s-duct over the predecessors with radar blocker. If someone really want to imply a comparison, it should find a more convincing case like what we observed from yanks’ practice.

S-duct or radar blocker is a moot point. if you argue fat is beauty against my view that the slim is beauty, i also can’t rebuff rightfully, the only thing i can say is you are the one bucking the trend, and no doubt people can make the easy conculsion by themselve.