good luck for tonight, Portugal. Hope you tear them to rags, especially up the right side, and rub it right up Sven that he snubbed Ing-ur-lund’s best leftsided midfield player (and a striker who’s better than Heskey, for that matter… but then, I know 70 year olds who’re more effective than Heskey).
Originally posted by Jeanske_SN
Whata irline was it acutallly? Did it also go up in BA?
Yes, BA bought it up in around ’87. Subsequently, BA used the B-Cal name for it’s Charter division (previously British Airtours); The name however soon dissapeared, before resurfacing as Caledonian, which eventually was merged into jmc, before becoming TCX.
This is the Viking colour scheme. http://www.airliners.net/open.file/494336/M/
1985, aged 6, BA GLA-LHR-CDG-GLA
unsure about the aircraft for the GLA-LHR leg, although I reckon it was a 757 😀 😀 😀
LHR-CDG was an L1011, and the [direct] return flight CDG-GLA a week later was a BAC1-11.
Ah, but we’re talking Ryanair here… it’s probably cheaper in the long run to have windows fitted, rather than having to pay for lighting in a darkened out 737… 😉
Or just imagine teh amount of lawsuits they’d face over injuries sustained while rushing to the ‘best’ seats and tripping over the seats, as the self loading cargo couldn’t see them due to darkness.
Come now, the bmi name is only about 3 years old, and the British Midland name is only thirty odd years old (it was, after all, ‘Derby Airways’ previously).
As to what bmi would have to say about 744’s… well, the original story was that Virgin was going to buy bmi, so I don’t think bmi would have much say in the matter of being all Airbus or not…
Anyway, Dartie, Bermuda II is a rather outdated agreement legislating transatlantic (at least, to the US) traffic rights from LHR. Basically, to prevent the routes becoming oversaturated, only four companies (two from each nation… this in itself is a modification of the original, but more on that in a second) are allowed to sell tickets for flights from LHR to the United States (they are BA, VS, AA and UA). Originally, Bermuda II only allowed three companies to operate transatlantic (at the time they were BOAC [British Overseas Airways Corporation, who merged with the original BEA to form BA] (subsequently BA), Pan Am and TWA). When Pan Am went belly up, United bought their slots at LHR, but the UK government insisted that to allow UA to take over PA’s place in Bermuda II, it be ammended to allow Virgin transatlantic rights from LHR (previously, they’d only operated from Gatwick). TWA later sold their traffic rights to American, as they were short on cash.
That’s why Delta, Continental, US Airways, Northwest etc fly to Gatwick, and not to LHR (Bermuda II only regulating LHR, and no other UK airport).
Air India operate flights from LHR to JFK, amongst others, but tickets on this flight are only avaliable to passengers using LHR as a stopover on the Delhi-New York Air India route. Cathay Pacific have also now been allowed to fly from LHR to the States (again, connecting CX pax only), as Hong Kong granted VS stopover rights on their proposed Kangaroo route.
Bermuda II obviously stops bmi flying transatlantically from LHR, which is why their ORD and IAD flights are from Manchester.
phew, it’s simple, really…
AH, finally things are looking up a bit here at BSL…
The times for the STN flight could probably be improved (no chance of popping back to Parkhead for the day with those times…), but I’ll finally have the chance to go on a loco day trip… 😀 Berlin, here I come.
Added to the news that MASkargo (Malayasia Airlines’ Cargo service) is to introduce a twice weekly 747-200F service [Sydney-Kuala Lumpur-Dubai-Manchester-Basel-Dubai-Kuala Lumpur-Sydney], there should be plenty of interesting stuff about.
Incidentally, easyjet today announced yet another new base, at Dortmund.
easyJet today announced that it is establishing Dortmund International Airport as its next European base. As part of the airline’s expansion plans for Germany the airline will introduce eight routes, with three aircraft operating from Dortmund.
easyJet today confirmed six of the routes, and the remaining two will be announced shortly.
Europe’s leading low cost airline will operate twice-daily services to Paris (Charles de Gaulle) and London Luton Airport, and daily services to Nice, Palma (Majorca), Alicante, and Rome (Ciampino). One-way fares will start at EUR 19 including all taxes and charges.
Flights will commence at the end of May 2004 and will be available for sale later today, here on http://www.easyJet.com.
Dortmund is the gateway to the vast and wealthy Rhine/Ruhr industrial catchment – representing a market with huge inbound and outbound potential: two million people visited the city of Essen alone last year. In total, some 11 million people live within 60 minute’s drive-time of the airport – an area that also includes the major cities of Essen and Düsseldorf and is roughly the same population as London. GDP per head at EUR 25,000 is significantly ahead of the European average and more than one-fifth of all Germany’s GDP comes from the area.
Two new routes, from Berlin Schönefeld to Basel and Budapest were also announced today.
The twice-daily service to Basel will start on 20 May 2004, and the daily service to Budapest commences on 17 June 2004. One way fares for both routes start from EUR 25.99 (EUR 51.98 return including taxes and charges), representing a huge saving for customers compared to the high fares charged by the traditional airlines.
These new services increase the total number of easyJet routes to 145, from 43 major airports throughout Europe, including 13 bases.
Ray Webster, said:
“It was only a couple of months ago that we announced our intention to significantly enter the German market with a substantial base of operation at Berlin. Today’s announcement further strengthens our position in Germany – particularly in the vast and wealthy industrial heartland of the Rhine/Ruhr valley with its massive catchment area.
“This is yet another step in the planned growth of easyJet and the fact that we can start eight new routes using three aircraft by opening up a single new airport underlines why we put so much emphasis on network density and the joining-the-dots element of our growth strategy.”
Originally posted by Bmused55 Boeing have recognised that most, I say MOST not all, airlines are opting for frequency over capacity. If that trend widens to long haul then it is Airbus that will loose out; For the A380 will not sell in this case and as we all know, this is a make or break product for Airbus.
I still say there’s only a very limited scope for that, as Slots in europe are becoming rarer and rarer. The Skies are congested as they are, and just because Boeing look at the States where there are no slots dosen’t mean that we all have to follow them blindly.
Yes, Point to Point is a great idea, but it’s just not possible in most places, due to lack of airspace/runway limitations/etc etc.
And that’s why I think the larger aircraft will prove to make more sense in the long run rather than lots of 772/332 size aicraft.
Here endeth the Sermon.
I was in the row beside the wing service door on a BA shuttle down to Heathrow once (row 32 on this diagram). Plenty of leg space, although there was a Steward on a jumpseat opposite. BA don’t have toilets there, anyway, they have a small galley. The midaircraft toilets on BA 75’s are behind the second set of main doors, near the wing root.
aye, light blue is never good. it’d be better with an extra green hoop, too… 😉
ok, Jean, I’ve had a wee look on Opodo for you…
, if you want to help then give a COMPLETE itinerary. If I can do it for 600 EUR per person to and from Miami that would be okay. BELOW 700 EUR per person and THANK YOU
If you don’t mind really bad times, you can Iberia from BRU to Miami via Madrid for 655Euros per person (including tax)… the drawback is the flight dosen’t arrive in Miami till 10:05pm, and the return is at 00:25…
BA from BRU to Miami via Heathrow are at more sociable times (two flights a day) and cost 662Euros (including tax)
Dates I used were outbound 12 July, returning 23 July.
Re: Best seat on a Britannia 757
Originally posted by wilag are they good on take off and that?
Oh yeeeeeah!
You can’t beat an RB211-535E4 powered 752 on takeoff.
you haven’t named all of them…
Helvetic.com, for one…
And I’ll bet there’s more out there, too…
Monarch scheduled, for example.
so that’s a commercial bizjet, and she’s acting as a female spy while serving drinks?
yeah, although they already got some A330-200’s last year, to replace the 767-300’s on domestic services. the 330-300’s are for International services.