Fear what? …of MiG 25RB taking pictures of air transports?
The big knock on missileer planes in the 1960’s was their inability to visually see the battle space and identify the difference between friend and foe. Could we be approaching the era of drone motherships being the centerpiece of six generation aerial task forces? You’re future drones will be able to pipe this same level of information to battle net hubs and it will relay to a regional drone operator. I’m not so certain we’ll need many manned jets at that point.
IMHO the convergence and dissemination of terabytes of data streams is what separates the fifth generation from the fourth. So many sensors are converging it will take further evolutions of stealth to stay effective more than two decades in the future. And with AI developing so fast that may ultimately remove the man from the front line. This helmet is more or less fifth generation equipment that requires evolvement of both man-machine interface and the airframe to function. Without exterior cameras with signifant lenses you have nothing more than a fancy home security system.
I think this is the norm by 2020. Even a lightweight fighter with said system has a situational awareness advantage over heavy fighters not using it. I do believe the F-22 had the seeds to the idea incorporated in its design twenty five years back. It just took this long to mature.
So do we suspect that the Mirage 4000 would have carried six R.550 Magic II and two OR four SUPER 530D? I would still think they would have two under fuselage links and one under each wing. You still should have room for a centerline drop tank and a drop tank under each wing.
That explains a lot.

http://mblogthumb1.phinf.naver.net/20111004_292/pwrangshion_13176948964803TEJ6_JPEG/815995957486098826.jpg?type=w800
http://mblogthumb2.phinf.naver.net/20111004_145/pwrangshion_1317694876069qEz6S_JPEG/664562420014869261.jpg?type=w800
The R530 was used on quite a few Mirage models. Several Mirage III types could carry one centerline. Some of the Mirage F1 types could carry one centerline or one Super 530F under each wing, but I don’t think they could use the combination of different 530’s on all three stations at once.
Later mods of the Mirage 2000 could carry a pair of larger Super 530D, one under each wing. But are those four Super 530F and two Super 530D on one Mirage 2000?
I would imagine the idea was four 530’s and six 550’s or four each and two supersonic 1300L drop tanks. Not much more than the M2K in all reality. And with no real improvement over M2K, why?
Seems real to me. it came up in a google image search. dont know if theres a high res version of it. looks like f-18s to me, so the blue angels.
The lighting in your picture and the background are so surreal. They make a picture definitive of the thread title.
Maybe related to…

Is that last picture you posted artwork or real? I’d like to see a hi-res image. 🙂
There is obviously a disconnect in communication here. I posted a picture of the same area that is largely still in good shape relative to the last few weeks. You’re caught up in semantics. So what if the museum is overall better. It wasn’t what he mentioned as being deteriorated. The aesthetic shape of those planes in the aforementioned area is steadily eroding.
I’m not sure why you’re being so critical.
The areas that slipperysam pointed out are much better in the latter photo, so yes. His post was not an overview of the whole museum.
Back in better days…
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/6/7/8/1987876.jpg