TomcatViP-
Once again you’re judging by reason and not science. You might have a quarter of the energy at twice the height, but the air density drops off considerably above 18K feet, so your sound median isn’t very helpful to bringing the sound back down.
TomcatViP-
The videos you show are low altitude. The Iron Dome is intercepting low trajectory missiles that are coming in nowhere near 33K feet. The sonic boom is a product of speed, size, etc. The Buk’s missile is well big enough to be heard. One of the problems the video shows is when missiles launch the object reaches supersonic speed immediately and you don’t get the same sound, but the rumbling does last some time as it reverbs across the landscape.
Nicely restored
Whats up with all these threads..
Best question of the thread.
The Ukraine is a modern example why you maintain armed forces as an assurance of sovereignty. I don’t think treaties can ever be trusted. Some of the greatest battles shouldn’t of ever happened because both parties already had signed treaties. It happened before the Battle of Vienna. It happened before Operation Barbarosa. It’s still happening today.
Seal it up real good. I like gouache but its so easy to ruin with moisture.
Yes the double boom is the supersonic missile. Few on the ground would have heard the hit, because those sounds would have bounced around up high. The sound isn’t like a firework because the charge is a tens of thousands of feet per second, not the paltry hundreds of feet per second of a firework.
Where did you get the idea AIM-54 required subsonic release? Its predecessors were launched in tests up to Mach 2.8 and suffered not. And AIM-54 prototypes were tested in F-111B using supersonic speeds.
Technically the group that fired the SA-5 is part of the breakaway Crimea. Chalk that one up for the rebels, too, now. It was a sign. /sarcasm
China is long on labor. It’s not an issue about maintenance. As long as they meet acceptable readiness rates for peace-time then they should be fine. The real issue would be if they have to deploy them. Will they risk flying them to major arms shows?
Well there once were MiG-15’s that required new engine overhauls every 100 hours. Don’t underestimate the stubbornness of management.
They can sell their Typhoons to the UK and downgrade to Gripen A leasing.
Such an outlandish conspiracy theory could work if we were to believe that the Buk missile system operators could recognise the difference between the Ukrainian air force and a civilian airliner passing through – but the Buk operators almost certainly didn’t know the identity of any aircraft out of visual range flying overhead, the had no IFF to go on – they simply attacked everything that flew overhead.
Even though it has an EO device meant to see targets out to maximum range even in moist conditions?
Another Hornetized Fulcrum using wide butt
[ATTACH=CONFIG]231690[/ATTACH]
Another Hornetized Fulcrum using skinny butt
[ATTACH=CONFIG]231689[/ATTACH]
Long necked, wide butt Typhoon
[ATTACH=CONFIG]231665[/ATTACH]