I don’t think Austria feels maligned by the Typhoon. They just had treatises to navigate in its induction.
Even a software upgrade won’t give them F-16 performance carrying a full load while flying clean. Never mind the stealth, EOTS, etc….
Buying up or leasing secondhand Typhoons gives them an edge over Pakistan and China now and buys them time for future programs to bear fruit. They should be discussing this with Typhoon operators now, using secret talks and keeping money off the regular budget, to buy assurances. India is treating this like a game and sovereignty is no game.
$20 billion would be a hiccup in American defense spending. Funny how a billion people economy is fretting over an inflation downturn when they created the downturn. The deal is worth the $20 billion, but their tradition of bribes is going to make it $50 billion if they don’t get the economy under control.
The question of India’s involvement in PAKFA is how much transfer of tech is involved. Merely paying the bill without co-development does not get you an advantage over regional threats. The IAF needs to be able to transfer the technology to an alternative program which happens to be idled. Rafale was the hedge against PAKFA failure. And now they’re worried about the triviality of price. No sense of priority. No political game plan. No oneupmanship. India is waffling when they should be calm, cool, and confident.
If the leadership had balls they’d be sweeping up secondhand Typhoons. Even first generation Typhoon interceptors gives them breathing space against Rafale and PAKFA uncertainties.
Second hand Typhoon T1’s are probably looking rather attractive right now. But honestly India’s decision making process has far too many people involved. Too many bosses, not enough staff.
I kind of wonder why PLAAF never ordered a “Super Fantan”, scale the Q-5 up sharing the same powerplant as the J-7s. It would look a lot like a twin engine F-105.
It’s called the J-8II. Twin engines same family as J-7. Pointy nose improvement over the snub it replaced.
If you look closely the others do not, even though closer to the source, have distinct vertical lines. It looks like the smudge tool cleaned up an area and then that section was copy pasted over the RF serial. While it is not a serial number, it is a serial sequenced number. Even the dash after RF has been clipped. There should be a gradient from lighting showing darkening further from the camera ever so slightly. In that picture it is unusual. The helicopter may not be a PS, but it’s an unusual pattern where the RF serial should be.
Hornetized Fulcrum
Fulcrumized Hornet
[ATTACH=CONFIG]229663[/ATTACH]
swerve understood the comment. It has to be stretched to mean the ISIS is Shia, which it is not. I don’t understand why Mountain went out of his way to say it as such.
ISIS also will bind the Kurds to the Iraqi nation, and when the Sunnis realize the horror that is ISIS then even they will want to be rid of them.
This is nation building at its finest, when people come together against a common threat. I hope they do rally around their flag and all fight ISIS back to the stone age. The units that would be quick to get Frogfoot into active service are mainly Sunni, not Shia.
What does that even mean!? The country is dividing along sectarian lines, and you cant even bother to admit you dont even realise that ISIS is Sunni as opposed to Shia. You are making ill informed comments.
Sunni is 20% of the population, Kurd is 20%, and Shia makes up most of the remainder with very small fractions of Christians and Turkmen. ISIS does not represent the Sunni, it represents an offshoot of radical Sunni beliefs. The Sunni have merely cheered the removal of Shia, they do not truly back the ISIS radicalism. I suggest you become informed before acting like a jackass.

I see a missing serial with the original removed using smudge tool.
ISIS is Sunni, not Shia.
ISIS is a common threat which provides the glue for nation building.