dark light

merkle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 960 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Whirlwind #1192373
    merkle
    Participant

    Sorry David,

    I was a bit tired when I wrote that statement,and Muddled my words up as per usual 😀 😮

    No I never disagreed with you, I just wondered why she was in those colours that was all, was she used in a film, or some use that was not the norm? .

    in reply to: Whirlwind #1192986
    merkle
    Participant

    Thankyou for that Info David,

    I wonder why she was Painted in FAF colours at all ??, if it was totally ficticious,
    very interesting all the same, she has been there quite some time, One day I would love to go and see the old girl, if I am in the area, and ive Permission of course . I am not one of these “Urban Explorer” types .
    Thanks again 🙂

    in reply to: Whirlwind #1194307
    merkle
    Participant

    Whirlwind XP344 North Luffenham/Rutland

    I am still wondering if any of you have seen in 2008/2009 the wreck of Whirlwind XP344 ,from reports on the web seemingly dumped in a hedge
    on the edge of the airfield ?.. My question is has anyone enquired about her or moved her from her long term location ?

    Looking at her she is Painted with French Roundals, so I imagine she must have served with the french airforce at some time in the past, but she has a British Serial No ??.

    Looking at the high content of Mag Alloy in the airframe of all whirlwinds, I hate to think what the Corrosive state of her is today?

    any info about her I would be interested to know, and or any other airframes in rough condition, ie too far gone for a restoration, especailly Whirlwind,Wessex,or JP Mrk 3 or 4.

    I am not talking of the photos we have all seen on the net, but things that are generally not known,and would be interesting to all.

    So has anyone Visited XP344 in Recent Months ??, or have any new pics of Preddannack Airframes ?

    I look forward to your replies 😀

    Thanks to all who can help 😀

    in reply to: Whirlwind #1195927
    merkle
    Participant

    Scrap ?

    Oh and By the way David, I have been studying suitable candidates for quite some time, and I agree with what you say It has to be one that is suitable ie- a frame that is past restoration, But there isnt many of those as most are in restorable condition.

    I wish it were possible to save and transport a whole one to various shows, but sadly i am sure you are aware Logistically that is impossible, so it has to be a cockpit section, as Logistics govern this.

    Also the ones that come up for tender are normally in very good condition, and run in there thousands,

    I have approached a museum regarding a Hulk, Hopefully they might oblidge,
    I await there reply with Bated breath,

    Its quite funny really old scrap boats are old scrap Boats, Unless you happen to love Boats, old classic cars are the same, Even things like the Austin Maxi have some sort of following, and you wouldnt think twice about seeing one of those crushed at the scrap yard, yet aircraft never seem to be classed as scrap, even when most of the bits are missing and theres plenty of rot in it and there in Abundance,Theres allways someone there who will save it if they can, the same goes for any other “Old” Vehicle ,They all have followings by many individuals, Many would disagree with us and say.. its Just old scrappy helicopters or Airplane, who the hell would want that !, the same as if someone offered me a austin allegro or Maxi, I would say “who the hell would want that !”.
    It all Boils down to one mans rubbish is another mans gold I suppose,

    at the end of the day ,no matter how pleasing to the eye old aircraft derelict or otherwise might enthrall us aircraft nuts, a Lot of it is Just that “Scrap” , never again to do its job or purpose in life , redundant , same with cars or anything past there “Usefull” Purpose, so what is the real harm in removing a cockpit from something that there are many many examples of in the country,and is totally redundant ,before the aircraft is scrapped on site anyway, if it was a Vauxhall Nova you wouldnt bat a eyelid,…. why should a old Wessex be any different.

    I am only pointing out what many who dont have a passion in aviation like we do might think of all this ??

    I only say this as I met a man today who used to work in RAF St Athan , his job used to be scrapping Tornado jets, that had run past there service date,
    he said to look at them when they come in ,they were nice clean aircraft, but by the time his contract team had finished with them,they were just chopped ,Stripped,empty Hulks, and he couldnt understand why I was so facinated with them, to him it was just a Job, and I am sure he would do it to a fleet of Wessex given half a chance, he said it was the best job of his life,But as for the planes,well he didnt give a damn, Just scrap metal to him .

    So hence why I was trying to find the right MOD department to find out about saving a cockpit next time one is up for scrap,because no matter how I feel enthusiastic about them, if there going to be Junked, then thats that, and it will happen regardless if I enquire or not.
    But,….If I can save a little something “Whilst” there in the throws of doing it, well….
    … Happy Days !! :):)

    in reply to: Whirlwind #1195954
    merkle
    Participant

    It’s hardly surprising that two of the airframes at Prendannack were burnt. The site exists to train firefighters in the art of rescuing people – the ‘powers that be’ don’t exist to pander to the desires of aircraft enthusiasts – the aircraft have a value and are sold through tenders amongst other avenues.
    I suggest that you look again at the likely candidates and avoid machines were basically it’s destroyed just to yield a cockpit.

    Hi David,

    I am not being narky , just wanting to pass on info i was told by a C/O of a firefighting school , MOD.and by some others who have all said the same thing.who work within the Fire dept’s

    The reason I was suprised that the airframes were burnt, was because I was told quite catagorically that because of new enviroment Guidelines a few years ago the BURNING of Airframes became a Tabboo, and they were not allowed to Burn them because of “Contamination” etc (I dont know all the ins a outs)

    instead they are supposed to use a purpose built rig for Fire practice,

    all they can use in airframes are “Smokes” to practice fire procedures, and also crew rescue procedure training.

    This is why I as I say was shocked, Please dont think I was “Having a go ,I was Just Highlighting the fact.

    Thanks for the Input though I do appreciate it 🙂

    in reply to: Whirlwind #1196132
    merkle
    Participant

    Gutted 🙁

    Just read that 2 or 3 of the Preddanack Wessex Airframes, that would have been Ideal as cockpit restorations were “BURNT” 😮 🙁 in 2008 .. Probably whilst I was writing emails and asking about them 🙁 .. Theres a bloody suprise :rolleyes::rolleyes:

    it really does seem to me the powers that be really really do there level best to “Stick to the system” as to not stick to the system .. God the Forms they would have to fill in 🙂

    I believe XM870 and XP160 were 2 of those that were burned ?:(: (: mad:

    in reply to: Whirlwind #1196281
    merkle
    Participant

    Re- Welcome Back !

    Why Thankyou for your Kind words.. Come on .. you cant have missed me, I was forever Moaning .. LOL;):D:diablo:

    in reply to: Whirlwind #1196298
    merkle
    Participant

    Whirlwind

    Hi all,:D

    Yes I am back, not too often though, Ive been busy doing up my Lambretta, I tried my Hardest to turn my back on the Aviation scene, as I just seemed to be getting nowhere with it, But I Cant .. its in me and been in me since childhood, Carry on Regardless I say 😀 .. I Must be a slave to aviation ,LOL

    Ive been Busy writing letters, to all sorts of Govt dept’s etc regarding wessex hulks, (still cant stop thinking of em) (sorry to Bore you all. haha)

    I find it hard to understand why it is the likes of Paintball Parks, Diving centres,Film companies and outdoor Pursuits Centre’s seem to be able to obtain old Hulks that invariably eventually end up destroyed.

    and yet when a single person, who isnt a Business, or a charity tries to talk to the MOD etc it sometimes feels like banging yer head against a brick wall,

    I really in all honesty, whatever cockpit I have Harped on about in the past, only ever wanted what so many of you wanted to do, Lovingly restore it, and take it to shows, and even perhaps use it to raise funds for our service personel’s Charities.

    I wanted to do this 10 years ago, But never pulled my finger out, or got all confused with the red tape,its amazing to see just how regulated it all is ??.

    So I will keep on searching, Ive given up on Hunters, Love them to bits mind, allways will, But there now in such short supply and all in Private hands,with such a big following.
    However, the wessex, well different story, there seems to be a abundance of them all over the country, and now as far as I am aware are Banned from any future flying,due to a design fault in the rotor drive ?. so lots of them are now in Museums ,which is a good thing, But the majority are still Mouldering on fire dumps , or being used as training rigs for new erks, all Good causes I grant you, but with so many , surely there must be a way to secure a old Cockpit/Cab from a Hulk that is due to be scrapped ??,especailly when on certain bases they are not even used, and are abandoned on there sides, smashed and forlorn, sad remains of what were once such loved aircraft.

    theres not even much scrap metal in a Wessex/whirlwind cockpit for it to be of any scrap Value.

    I just thought it would be a novel way of continuing some sort of service to
    raise funds now and again for charity, rather than just being chopped up??.

    Ive written many letters and hope for a reply, But I am not counting on it,
    Because simply ,I dont think the powers that be are interested in a Individual,but rather would not rock the boat and continue to use the system for disposal they have in place to the letter. Red tape after red tape.

    So i have hit another Brick wall??, and to be honest.. I am at a Loss as to what to do about it,or how to next approach it.

    I May have it all wrong ??. and its me who is wrong and have been dealing with the wrong dept, or organisations.. I certainly am no expert.

    so Please if anyone out there knows “who or What” dept to deal with regarding this issue, I would really appreciate a “Pointer” in the right direction?:confused:

    as for the fire dump Photos, of the whirlygig, well, they were never done, I never recieved them in the end sadly,

    and lastly .. a Very Happy St Goerge’s Day to you all ,its been a corker weather wise 😉

    in reply to: Whirlwind #1197608
    merkle
    Participant

    Whirlwind XN387

    Hi .. Been trawling through the Net, and reading the 21st edition of Wrecks a Relics,

    Come across XN387 Whirlwind HAR.9 supposedly residing in a Scrapyard on the A685,South of Brough, Kendal, Cumbria . and “Was” for sale, ??

    Can anyone tell me any more about this old bird, is she now scrapped. I know she was in a bad way , But have no Idea what happened to her after she went to the scrapyard ???,

    Anyone have any Idea’s or Photo’s ???

    😀

    I have trawled the net,and looked at the books and have drawn a blank.. would be interested with what you fine fellows can come up with 🙂

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe Airframes possibly for disposal. #1199345
    merkle
    Participant

    Yes come on you two.. as much as am interested.. youve worked too hard to let it all slip away.. Please reconsider, the aviation scene wouldnt be the same without you guys 🙁

    in reply to: Two T-33 Cockpits. Worth Saving?(2007 Zombie) #1221422
    merkle
    Participant

    Or the Mysteres ???..

    Are they still there Pete ??, the dassault Mysteres ?, wouldnt be suprised if they had gone to the melting pot too 🙁 ??

    in reply to: Jet Provost Pics Here #1225691
    merkle
    Participant

    LOVE those Black and White Pics of the Early Provosts, 🙂

    I found this Vid ,its a nice bit of Classic, if not a little cheesy , Provost RAF Filming.. I suppose anything in those early post war colours just give me goose bumps 🙂

    heres the vid

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f78v0a7Sqn8&feature=channel

    in reply to: Hunter GA.11 question Please #1221408
    merkle
    Participant

    Hi

    For anyone interested, there’s still one GA-11 curently airworthy in the UK.
    The aircraft is XE685 and its still retains its FRADU markings and code, which is 861. The aircraft is based at Exeter Airport and is part of the Hunter Flying Ltd fleet.

    Also part of Hunter Flying’s fleet is former FRADU Hunter PR-11 WT723. This aircraft is currently painted up in Black Arrows markings and marked up as “XG194”. This was to mark the 50th anniversary of the famous 22 Hunter loop at Farnboriugh in 1958. This aircraft is the oldest Hunter still flying in the world today.

    Freebird

    and What a gorgeous Aircraft she is too, XE685 🙂

    in reply to: Hunter GA.11 question Please #1221989
    merkle
    Participant

    SO Just to corroberate what has been said !!, Please excuse me for being a little dense, But from what I can see, Most if not all the GA.11 aircraft were all actually converted from Old F.4 Aircraft,

    which Didnt have any changes in airframe, Engine,or Cockpit design, Apart from, Removal of all the Gun systems, and Blanking off the Gun ports ??

    and of course later in there life they had “Harley Lights ” fitted, but as for a GA.11 , converted in the early 1960s, it is Basicly a F.4 with the Guns removed, ?
    and that is about it ??

    I am sure you will tell me if I am wrong ??:D

    in reply to: 4 Bladed Piston engine and MOD vehicles #1222456
    merkle
    Participant

    Naval Gun, and Gerry aircraft Loss

    That Gun is VERY interesting, It looks like (correct me if I am wrong) a Naval 4″ Deck Gun , from the WW1 Period, These Guns were also used in Coastal defenses in WW2, We had 2 of them up on a Battery off Portishead Point , Defending the Port, I was trying for years to find one to place “Back” on the Point as a Memorial, and they are Very rare, I wouldnt be suprised if the Royal Naval Museum Organisations wouldnt be interested in it,
    and Or any Home defence Coastal Fort emplacments,
    Shame Portishead never got one of its guns back, as it is or was one of the oldest Forts in the Bristol Channel, infact if not the oldest , Going as far back as Roman times, and as a actual fort with Cannon from elizabethen times, Then used in the English Civil war firing on royalist ships, later rebuilt to defend against Napoleon, and then Updated to Armstrong Guns in the Victorian age, ,and re-instated throughout WW2, ,Now Buried under tons of fly ash from the old power station, But the “Tops” of the Gun emplacement are still there today, Just the rest is buried,Would love to see it uncovered 😀

    My Uncle who served there swore blind he saw a gerry aircraft dive into the sea, just off the portishead Point , But i can find NO record of it, he said it dived out of the cloud, streaming smoke, after a ensueing Battle above the clouds, twin engined he says, But its miffed me for years, all I can find is I read somewhere that a british fighter pilot engaged a gerry, I think 92 sqn ??,but lost him when he went through the clouds, in the ensueing battle between our fighters and there bombers, it may have been the Me110 Raid on Parnells, But certainly No record of a lost german aircraft in that area in that fashion.
    My Uncle (now deceased) often told me this story, and he was a reselute Christian, so I dont think he lied, He was stationed there During the war Manning those Coastal Guns, Hence how he says he got to see it ,
    if anyone can corroberate this story (which I doubt) I would be grateful 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 960 total)