The Perseus XII had a dry weight of 1105 lbs/502 kilos, a length of 36.3 inches and a diameter over the engine cowl of 53 inches.
And for the Mercury XII a dry weight of 966 lbs overall diameter of 51.5 inches.
But that said I looked on google and found other figures so take your pick.
Richard
I am half sorry to hear the Wildcat has gone as they are a visually impressive display aircraft that also make enough noise to partly drown out the commentator. That said I think Old Warden is best suited to wood and canvas aeroplanes pottering around a summer sky, bliss.
Talking of washout I think its a rare commodity on the Comet but the replica built in the USA was given some. I wonder what the rebuild of G-ACSP will get, project update here http://www.cometracer.co.uk/restoration/
Richard
Surely if the aircraft was going to nose over when the pilot got out, it would nose over whether it was running or not.
Several factors could cause this, firstly the pilot appears to be sitting behind the CofG so if he got out the aircraft would immediately become nose heavy, then with him not onboard the elevator which he would usually be holding fully up, stick right back, would drop down and lift the tail, although he might get away by tying the stick back with the seat harness or his trouser belt. Lastly Rotary engines are difficult/impossible to get to idle slowly so they produce a lot of residual thrust, some had blip switches to cut individual cylinders but the pilot would need to be in the cockpit to do that so fidling with the mixture controls to get the slowest idle is all you can do. So the chance of a nose over would be very likely.
Richard
A lot of this film also appears in another longer version https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGXr-BII6Qo where a Valetta and Chipmunk also appear along with the same droopy winged Tiger Moth. And I think the Argosies are actually C119’s.
Richard
Hi Richard
I had a look and the access panel you have (68781) was also used on the Whitley cowling. We are looking for one and I wondered if you would consider letting it go? I sent you a pm/email. The AW47 number is just an inspectors stamp and doesn’t relate to the aircraft model – it’s a bit of a red herring.
All the best
Elliott
Elliot
Your welcome to the panel, say where to and I will post it.
Richard
Just to answer my own post, this picture appears here where they suggest it is N3295 of 222 Sqn.http://ww2talk.com/forums/topic/25035-dunkirk-operation-dynamo-evacuation-beaches/page-8
And also discussed on this forum http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?87258-Spitfire-Mk-I-II-and-IIa-s-Prop-fittings
Richard
Sorry I cannot help with your item but I also have some parts from RAF Hampstead Norris, mine were just lying in a ploughed field and I picked them up about thirty years ago, always thought they were Albamarle.
They are a small access panel with AW47 68781 2 and inspectors stamps RC28 and RC3 and the end of a control rod p/n AW10046 and AW10044. I have always been puzzled as to why it has AW47 on it as the Albamarle was AW41 and the AW47 was never built. I didn’t know some were scrapped there.
Richard
It is intriguing as to what this dome is. From the picture I have a number of questions.
1. Is it symmetrical, not really sure from the image.
2. Is it made from what appears to be two thin layers. How thick are the layers.
3. What is the black stuff, is it earth or some sort of filler that has turned black near the breaks and still opaque in the remainder.
4. Is that a small metal plate and a wire in the two o’clock position.
Could it be an early form of radome, made from plastic/perspex to allow the passage of radar waves.
If it was designed to be strong enough to withstand cabin pressure one of the layers would need to be fairly strong, this doesnt appear to be that strong.
Would a 1940’s radome be double skinned?
Richard
The Skyraiders have been discussed before http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?63377-Fleet-Air-Arm-Museum-Skyraider-AEW-1s&highlight=swedish+skyraider+target+tugs
What is the steel tube fuselage frame, looks a bit like Hawker.
Richard
I’me not convinced your exhaust is Griffon or an exhaust part, seems all wrong to me. I would go for something along the lines of an induction duct. Does it have a 7th opening at the r/h end?
Richard
I had heard a couple of months back that this might be happening.
Planning for housing on the former Long Marston aerodrome has also just been given, resulting in the demise of the Shakespeare County Raceway dragstrip as well any flying activities there as well, and the Wellesbourne rumour came on the back of that news.
And Dunsfold have submitted plans to build over most of that site which would leave Brooklands ground runnable VC10 without a home.
If protection of airfields doesnt come soon very few if any will remain apart from the busy commercial ones.
Richard
Picture of unidentified aircraft on Ebay.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/original-factory-photograph-Unidentified-Aero-Engine-under-cockpit-/361461592668?hash=item5428ca325c:g:rZgAAOSwX~dWiikG
I actually think its Lincoln RA643 with a Bristol Phoebus in the bomb bay, interesting item.
Richard
In the UK Aero Research Ltd pioneered resin adhesives back as far as the 1930’s. I am only guessing but some of their resin mixed with a filler material such as talc or flour would make a paste like substance for filling rivet depressions, nowdays micro balloons are used for that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aero_Research_Limited
Richard
Personally I find this rather strange, if Mr Graves wants to erect a memorial on the site then just do it, obviously with the landowners permission, it doesnt need to be dug first. And as for the cows, most church yards around here have a few sheep in them to keep the grass down and nobody minds, or are cows different.
Richard
The Canberra is indeed WJ730 which sadly crashed only a few months later onto the runway at Farnborough. http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=21110
Richard