dark light

pogno

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 1,010 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lysander Engine Cowling differences #875044
    pogno
    Participant

    The Perseus XII had a dry weight of 1105 lbs/502 kilos, a length of 36.3 inches and a diameter over the engine cowl of 53 inches.
    And for the Mercury XII a dry weight of 966 lbs overall diameter of 51.5 inches.
    But that said I looked on google and found other figures so take your pick.

    Richard

    in reply to: Old Warden 2016 #879472
    pogno
    Participant

    I am half sorry to hear the Wildcat has gone as they are a visually impressive display aircraft that also make enough noise to partly drown out the commentator. That said I think Old Warden is best suited to wood and canvas aeroplanes pottering around a summer sky, bliss.

    Talking of washout I think its a rare commodity on the Comet but the replica built in the USA was given some. I wonder what the rebuild of G-ACSP will get, project update here http://www.cometracer.co.uk/restoration/

    Richard

    in reply to: Billy Bishop controversy. #883166
    pogno
    Participant

    Surely if the aircraft was going to nose over when the pilot got out, it would nose over whether it was running or not.

    Several factors could cause this, firstly the pilot appears to be sitting behind the CofG so if he got out the aircraft would immediately become nose heavy, then with him not onboard the elevator which he would usually be holding fully up, stick right back, would drop down and lift the tail, although he might get away by tying the stick back with the seat harness or his trouser belt. Lastly Rotary engines are difficult/impossible to get to idle slowly so they produce a lot of residual thrust, some had blip switches to cut individual cylinders but the pilot would need to be in the cockpit to do that so fidling with the mixture controls to get the slowest idle is all you can do. So the chance of a nose over would be very likely.

    Richard

    in reply to: BBMF Hurrican LF363 – but where? #900657
    pogno
    Participant

    A lot of this film also appears in another longer version https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGXr-BII6Qo where a Valetta and Chipmunk also appear along with the same droopy winged Tiger Moth. And I think the Argosies are actually C119’s.

    Richard

    in reply to: Albemarle undercarriage parts? #912949
    pogno
    Participant

    Hi Richard

    I had a look and the access panel you have (68781) was also used on the Whitley cowling. We are looking for one and I wondered if you would consider letting it go? I sent you a pm/email. The AW47 number is just an inspectors stamp and doesn’t relate to the aircraft model – it’s a bit of a red herring.

    All the best
    Elliott

    Elliot
    Your welcome to the panel, say where to and I will post it.

    Richard

    in reply to: Spitfire Pictured on Dunkirk Beach #913344
    pogno
    Participant

    Just to answer my own post, this picture appears here where they suggest it is N3295 of 222 Sqn.http://ww2talk.com/forums/topic/25035-dunkirk-operation-dynamo-evacuation-beaches/page-8
    And also discussed on this forum http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?87258-Spitfire-Mk-I-II-and-IIa-s-Prop-fittings

    Richard

    in reply to: Albemarle undercarriage parts? #913492
    pogno
    Participant

    Sorry I cannot help with your item but I also have some parts from RAF Hampstead Norris, mine were just lying in a ploughed field and I picked them up about thirty years ago, always thought they were Albamarle.
    They are a small access panel with AW47 68781 2 and inspectors stamps RC28 and RC3 and the end of a control rod p/n AW10046 and AW10044. I have always been puzzled as to why it has AW47 on it as the Albamarle was AW41 and the AW47 was never built. I didn’t know some were scrapped there.

    Richard

    in reply to: Dornier do17 E/F M/P over England, Nose glazing ID #844534
    pogno
    Participant

    It is intriguing as to what this dome is. From the picture I have a number of questions.

    1. Is it symmetrical, not really sure from the image.
    2. Is it made from what appears to be two thin layers. How thick are the layers.
    3. What is the black stuff, is it earth or some sort of filler that has turned black near the breaks and still opaque in the remainder.
    4. Is that a small metal plate and a wire in the two o’clock position.

    Could it be an early form of radome, made from plastic/perspex to allow the passage of radar waves.
    If it was designed to be strong enough to withstand cabin pressure one of the layers would need to be fairly strong, this doesnt appear to be that strong.
    Would a 1940’s radome be double skinned?

    Richard

    in reply to: Yeovilton secrets #845291
    pogno
    Participant

    The Skyraiders have been discussed before http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?63377-Fleet-Air-Arm-Museum-Skyraider-AEW-1s&highlight=swedish+skyraider+target+tugs
    What is the steel tube fuselage frame, looks a bit like Hawker.

    Richard

    in reply to: Aircraft part? #855918
    pogno
    Participant

    I’me not convinced your exhaust is Griffon or an exhaust part, seems all wrong to me. I would go for something along the lines of an induction duct. Does it have a 7th opening at the r/h end?

    Richard

    in reply to: No more Vulcan runs at Wellesbourne? #872586
    pogno
    Participant

    I had heard a couple of months back that this might be happening.
    Planning for housing on the former Long Marston aerodrome has also just been given, resulting in the demise of the Shakespeare County Raceway dragstrip as well any flying activities there as well, and the Wellesbourne rumour came on the back of that news.

    And Dunsfold have submitted plans to build over most of that site which would leave Brooklands ground runnable VC10 without a home.
    If protection of airfields doesnt come soon very few if any will remain apart from the busy commercial ones.

    Richard

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay (2016) #873320
    pogno
    Participant

    Picture of unidentified aircraft on Ebay.
    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/original-factory-photograph-Unidentified-Aero-Engine-under-cockpit-/361461592668?hash=item5428ca325c:g:rZgAAOSwX~dWiikG
    I actually think its Lincoln RA643 with a Bristol Phoebus in the bomb bay, interesting item.

    Richard

    in reply to: Use of Bondo on wartime aircraft. #875193
    pogno
    Participant

    In the UK Aero Research Ltd pioneered resin adhesives back as far as the 1930’s. I am only guessing but some of their resin mixed with a filler material such as talc or flour would make a paste like substance for filling rivet depressions, nowdays micro balloons are used for that.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aero_Research_Limited

    Richard

    in reply to: Stirling Discovery In France #876120
    pogno
    Participant

    Personally I find this rather strange, if Mr Graves wants to erect a memorial on the site then just do it, obviously with the landowners permission, it doesnt need to be dug first. And as for the cows, most church yards around here have a few sheep in them to keep the grass down and nobody minds, or are cows different.

    Richard

    in reply to: Old Farnborough Pictures #880226
    pogno
    Participant

    The Canberra is indeed WJ730 which sadly crashed only a few months later onto the runway at Farnborough. http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=21110

    Richard

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 1,010 total)