I my view it looks very much like something from the 1970’s or even newer. The number is the casting is just that, the casting p/n, when machined and had parts added to it it will be given a new number. The paint finish looks very Boeing like, but I may be completely wrong.
What do the inspection stamps say, I cannot read them in the photo.
Richard
The refueling unit is a Thompson Bros mk V built in quantity during WW2.
See link http://www.blackcountrymemories.org.uk/thompbros/thompbros02.htm
Newforest – Was that a joke!
Richard
I think the coin designer had a hand in this http://www.emodels.co.uk/plastic-kits/superflight-spitfire-inflatable-40575-p-16421.html
Richard
And the reason old airfields were used is that the turkey sheds could be dotted around each airfield using the runways as foundations and link roads, while at the same time spacing the sheds sufficiently far apart to prevent disease cross infection.
Richard
Very nicely done, I hope he got a free watch out of it.
Richard
I have not heard of a armoured radiator on a Hurricane before, did it change the external appearance of the radiator housing or was it hidden out of sight within?
Richard
What a nice project. I know of two Hastings that were out of use at Malts, one WJ325 a C4 and WJ328 a C2.
The picture of the nose section is a C1 or 2 by the position of the markings so its likely WJ328. Is that part of the aircrafts name visible which would probably confirm which aircraft it is from.
Been discussed here before http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=33684&page=2
Richard
Why not sell them to the Afghan air force, then in 40 years time the survivors might be found on a rubbish dump and restored for the Shuttleworth collection, just like a previous Hawker product.
Richard
Back to the original thread, watch this film about the Nord Transall at 3:13 it shows one being barrell rolled, thats a pretty big aircraft to do that with and keep its wings on.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2ovgq_c160-transall-luftwaffe_tech
Also in the film of Bob Hoover rolling an Aero Commander while pouring iced tea, he couldnt have done that if the jug was several times its usual weight because of additional G.
Richard
Its actually a Zlin 526AFS the single seat version.
Richard
WIX Forum Down? (or is it just me)
Since yesterday I have been unable to access the Warbird Information Exchange Forum, is it me or is the site down.
Richard
What was the point of shortening the nose (and moving the c of g backwards as a result) when fairing over the turret would have ‘civilianised’ the Lanc far more easily?
JK
The C of G has to remain within certain fore and aft limits and these will be clearly stated within the operating manuals for the aircraft, certainly in the weight and balance manual.
So if you remove or fit something to the airframe the effect of doing so has to be calculated and checked to see if you are still within the limits stated. If not then it may be possible to move heavy items(batteries for example)to different locations within the fuselage or add ballast, usually lead if bolted to the structure or bags of shingle if temporary. The Lancaster shown has also had its tail turret removed which being further away from the C of G would have had a far greater effect. The fuel transfer equipment that has been added is in the bomb bay near the C of G so would have less effect.
Then before flight the weight of the load including crew, passengers, fuel, baggage, water are all taken into account and again the positions of these within the fuselage are defined to keep within the C Of G limits.
Richard
Graham
I didnt see the programme but have read the accounts of how prickly a Sunderland could be. For a long time it seemed to me implausible that an aircraft that looked so cumbersome could look after itself so well, until you take into account its operational altitude, counted in feet, then you realise how all the armament could be trained on anything having to make a shallow dive attack on it.
Would the same low level operation technique have worked for the B17or B24’s of the USAAF and the heavies of Bomber Command. Flack and terraine would obviously have been an increased problems but attack from below by enemy fighters would have been prevented.
Richard
A caption to a picture of the Tabloid in the Herleyford ‘Sopwith the Man and His Aircraft’ says——This compact biplane was aptly nicknamed the Tabloid at a time when aircraft in general were not given names. Moreover, a threat-tened lawsuit over the use of the name by a manufacturer of a medical compound of that name, apparantly only endorsed it in the publics mind. Although never officially bestowed ‘Tabloid’ it became by popular acclaim!.
Richard
The 5th pod was always a bit of a logistics nightmare especially if you were sending a spare engine to another station for another aircraft, especially if its a station without equipment.
The biggest problem is where to put the spare engine when it gets there, that means sending a stand as well, then where do you put the failed engine when it comes off the wing, so another stand has to go.
You dont see engines lying on car tyres very often(it has been done).
Richard